User talk:SLMorris81

Concern regarding Draft:Peter F Gallagher[edit]

Hello, SLMorris81. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter F Gallagher, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:Peter F Gallagher, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Draft:Peter F Gallagher has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter F Gallagher (September 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources used are reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter F Gallagher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SLMorris81! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

‪Reference: "S0091‬ left a message on your talk page in "‪Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter F...‬".

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left b..."

Thank you very much for reviewing. Apologies if this appeared like an advertisement, the British approach is to articulate a simple and comprehensive message that describes the person. I would appreciate feedback on how to present this information without it seeming like an advert. Please let me know how I can bring this article forward in the meantime. I have added further clarification to help you, see below.

1. I am comparing Peter F Gallagher with John Kotter (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kotter) to understand your requirements and expectations.

2. Wikipedia references 1, 2 and 3: I have referenced published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject - Thinkers360 2020, 2021 and 2022:

Peter F Gallagher

- https://www.thinkers360.com/top-50-global-thought-leaders-and-influencers-on-change-management-may-2020/

- https://www.thinkers360.com/top-50-global-thought-leaders-and-influencers-on-change-management-may-2021/

- https://www.thinkers360.com/top-50-global-thought-leaders-and-influencers-on-change-management-2022/

-- Website description text, "Thinkers360 is the world’s largest and premier marketplace for B2B thought leaders and influencers. Brands use our tools to hire the world’s foremost experts as well as amplify their own executives, employee advocates and insights!"

- Thinkers360 have over 70 thought leadership categories

- Thousands of thought leaders

- Evidence based ranking, that has to be verified by other members

John Kotter

- Not listed on Thinkers360

3. Wikipedia references 4: I have referenced published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject - Amazon:

Peter F Gallagher - 10 published books (sole author)

- https://www.amazon.com/Peter-F-Gallagher/e/B07P7NF6TP?ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1&qid=1662915448&sr=1-1

- All books link to an important concept: leadership, adoption, behaviour, sponsorship, leadership teams etc. (No books about animals or penguins)

John Kotter - 12 + published books (some joint authorship)

- https://www.amazon.com/s?k=john+kotter&i=stripbooks-intl-ship&crid=21VU6GFMXGWA2&sprefix=john+kotter%2Cstripbooks-intl-ship%2C145&ref=nb_sb_noss_1

- Books consider serious change management subjects but also include penguins, meerkats etc?

4. Wikipedia references 5 and 6: I have referenced published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject - comparison of company and personal websites:

Peter F Gallagher - Peter F Gallagher consulting and personal speaker websites

- https://www.a2b.consulting/

- https://www.peterfgallagher.com/

John Kotter - own company website

- https://www.kotterinc.com/who-we-are/our-team/ *

Wikipedia repeats same reference twice

5. Wikipedia reference 7: I have referenced published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject - leadersHum:

Peter F Gallagher - in this list Peter is ranked as number 1

- https://www.leadershum.com/blog/top-40-change-management-gurus-you-should-follow-in-2022?contentId=623af01316bd680ea55cdb7e?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=top-40change-management-gurus-listicle&utm_campaign=social-blast

John Kotter - in this list Peter is ranked as number 9?

- https://www.leadershum.com/blog/top-40-change-management-gurus-you-should-follow-in-2022?contentId=623af01316bd680ea55cdb7e?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=top-40change-management-gurus-listicle&utm_campaign=social-blast

6. Wikipedia reference 8: I have referenced published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject - ACMP:

Peter F Gallagher - Globally elected onto the Board of Directors by the Association of Change Management Professionals (ACMP) members

- https://www.acmpglobal.org/page/about_acmp#boardOfDirectors

John Kotter - none

7. New wikipedia reference: I have added further content on this thought leader using information which is in the public domain (UK Gov). These are referenced published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject

Peter F Gallagher has six registered trademarks:

- Model: a2B Change Management Framework

Trademark number: UK00003218090

Link: https://trademarks.ipo.gov.uk/ipo-tmcase/page/Results/1/UK00003218090

- Model: AUILM

Trademark number: UK00003263504

Link: https://trademarks.ipo.gov.uk/ipo-tmcase/page/Results/1/UK00003263504

- Model: a2B5R

Trademark number: UK00003268422

Link: https://trademarks.ipo.gov.uk/ipo-tmcase/page/Results/1/UK00003268422

- Model: LOC leadership of change

Trademark number: UK00003427248

Link: https://trademarks.ipo.gov.uk/ipo-tmcase/page/Results/1/UK00003427248

- Model: AMI Change Leadership Model

Trademark number: UK00003561862

Link: https://trademarks.ipo.gov.uk/ipo-tmcase/page/Results/1/UK00003561862

- Model: a2B3S Change Sponsorship Model

Trademark number: UK00003671769

Link: https://trademarks.ipo.gov.uk/ipo-tmcase/page/Results/1/UK00003671769

John Kotter - none

8. New Wikipedia reference: I have added further content on this thought leader using information which is in the public domain (YouTube). This is referenced published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject

Peter F Gallagher – Change Management Body of Knowledge (CMBoK)

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHSIex9JYMA

John Kotter - none

Thank you. Please let me know if you need any additional information to help you with this process.

Best regards from the UK

Sarah SLMorris81 (talk) 18:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter F Gallagher (September 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter F Gallagher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Your edit to Draft:Peter F Gallagher has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa (talk) 14:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thank you very much. I understand this is my third warning. I am trying to do this to the best of my knowledge.

Could you please help with these questions:

1. What is the copyright material you don't like? All the information I've entered is in the public domain

a. the photo comes from wikimedia

b. the text comes from linkedin, amazon etc.

2. Can you tell me specifically what you need to approve and publish this page?

I first submitted this over six months ago and have made no progress since then.

Many thanks

Sarah SLMorris81 (talk) 17:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Diannaa. Hi SLMorris81, it is unlikely anyone is going to see messages here unless you ping them. Your talk page is on my watchlist (along with thousands of other pages) but I just happened to see your note pop up. Dianna is one our most knowledgeable editors regarding copyright so hopefully she will be able to respond to your questions. The Teahouse is also an excellent place to ask questions. S0091 (talk) 17:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The content I removed was previously published at this website and this website. Both of these pages are marked as copyright, which means we can't publish the content here unless it's released under a compatible license. LinkedIn is also copyright. If the copyright holder wishes to release this material under a compatible license, please see WP:Requesting copyright permission for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. I am not an administrator on the Commons so I don't have access to any files that were deleted on that wiki.

The reviewer decined your draft because it reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia article. I don't work on approving drafts so you might ask at the Teahouse or ask the person who declined the draft what it will take to get it published. You might also have a look at Wikipedia:Notability (people) to see what kind of biographies we publish. — Diannaa (talk) 22:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]