User talk:SPNic

Hello, SPNic! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 21:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Main Page redesign[edit]

The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, Pretzels^Talk! 08:49, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review[edit]

You accidentally created [1] a deletion review on the page Wikipedia:Deletion today because you clicked "edit" at the section Wikipedia:Deletion today#Deletion review. I have moved it to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 15 where it belongs, and fixed the use of {{drv2}}. The review is transcluded in Wikipedia:Deletion today#15 March 2009 and can be edited by clicking "edit" at that section or the subsection, but not by clicking "edit" earlier on Wikipedia:Deletion today. PrimeHunter (talk) 03:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review[edit]

I have posted a question at Wikipedia:Deletion review#"The_Above_Ground_Sound"_of_Jake_Holmes which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it? Stifle (talk) 10:44, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Porn Awards[edit]

I propose to roll back the too bold change - comments? Power.corrupts (talk) 21:47, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Felicia Tang[edit]

Hi, SPNic. I saw your note about Deletion review. Here is another source: http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktla-felicia-tang-murder,0,1508792.story. My recommendation would be to not waste time with the bureaucracy, look around for other Southern California news coverage, and just use the newly-available sourcing to write an article, and post it. Obviously she was notable before the deletion of the article as well, but due to this tragedy, it's now easier to find sourcing on her and to write a "notable" article-- i.e., an article that will survive AfD... Good luck! Dekkappai (talk) 17:35, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A few more: [2], [3], [4], [5], etc. (more at [6]) Dekkappai (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll look into it when I get a chance-- have to finish up a little here & step out for a while right now. Dekkappai (talk) 02:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asa Akira[edit]

Hi, SPNic. I see the article was just closed as "delete". I think it's a bad close, and I didn't even save a copy of the article, because I thought it was pretty obvious she is "notable". (I've retrieved a copy from Google cache and stored it HERE-- feel free to copy it to your own workspace.) Anyway, no need to panic. Again, I wouldn't waste time with deletion review or other Wiki-procedures. Just work on the article in your workspace, or come over and work on it at Boobpedia: (http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Asa_Akira) I don't think there's any question she's already "notable", and will just get more so. Until you've put together enough sourcing and writing to make it crystal-clear, just add what you can to the article outside of the WP mainspace. Cheers! Dekkappai (talk) 21:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article you previously commented in is up for AFD again[edit]

I am contacting everyone who participated in the previous AFD to inform them the same exact article is up for deletion again. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_The_Simpsons_couch_gags_(2nd_nomination)#List_of_The_Simpsons_couch_gags Dream Focus 04:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to List of songs in Glee (season 2). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yves (talk) 18:53, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add information to Wikipedia without a reliable source. Thank you. Yves (talk) 18:53, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was not patronizing you. If you read my comment, you will see it is polite and merely to the point. I was just reminding you of one of Wikipedia's main policies; that information must be accompanied by a reliable source, which you did not provide here. Yves (talk) 19:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Civility[edit]

Do not call other users names. Please review WP:NPA. Hipocrite (talk) 16:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So you believe it's ok to call other people names if you don't like what they say? Hipocrite (talk) 17:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicole Oring for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicole Oring is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Oring until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Felicia Tang for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Felicia Tang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicia Tang (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krenshar[edit]

The article Krenshar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:12, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Felicia Tang for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Felicia Tang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicia Tang (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]