User talk:Saintouse

March 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at StG 44, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections will be made as neccessary

Correction will be made as neccessary when information or lack of description is found or presented to me. Failure to recognize these corrections will not be tolerated and will treated as a bias and false narrative. Continued corruption will be resolved with immediate removal of all false sources materials and editong and replaced by the corrected versions. Failure to comply will result in your departure and further access to all source editing. Saintouse (talk) 13:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Assault rifle, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 14:43, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Selective fire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AzureCitizen (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not violate my responsibilities

Continued violations will not be tolerated Saintouse (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Saintouse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! VQuakr (talk) 18:15, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your liberal bias views in wikipedia doesn't comply to your own policies

You have been warned Saintouse (talk) 19:15, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Liberals by their own nature believe that their views are already neutral. You aren't going to change that here. All you can effectively do is make sure that all other policies regarding reliable sourcing and such are followed. Even there, there is systematic bias toward liberal-left sources. Starting a one-person crusade to Right Great Wrongs will not succeed, and probably result in you being banned as being disruptive. However, tread carefully, learn how Wikipedia works, stay away from divisive issues initially, and eventually you'll have the knowledge to provide some balance in a highly effective way. In addition, you'll have the opportunity to meet like-minded people who can help you be more effective, and you them. If you aren't able to do that, your time here on Wikipedia is likely to be short. - BilCat (talk) 19:52, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm BilCat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:VQuakr have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 19:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 2015 Baltimore protests, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 21:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:00, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:06, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:13, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]