User talk:Sam786123

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Tiger, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Griffinofwales (talk) 23:11, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Coasterlover1994 22:13, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Mugger crocodile. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Jeff G. ツ 20:46, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tigers and crocodiles

Hi Sam,

You are obviously very committed in getting your crocodile facts into wikipedia and that is commendable, but as this is an encyclopedia rather than a forum, we have to make sure that all facts can be verified as many people will use this for reference. Do you have an internet reference that backs up the crocodile attacks on tigers? I've looked but can't see one. If your info comes from a book then that can be referenced on wikipedia too. I'm not good at citing book reference but will be happy to help if you need a hand. Regards danno 21:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi danno
  I have provided a number of reference on wikipedia that include both website and from the books the first one was from http://www.lairweb.org.nz/tiger/conflict11.html it is clearly stated in this website that tigers crossing water are sometimes taken by crocodiles and wikipedia has got edits from this website in the tiger article and they just delete this claim.They should delete  other articles as well if they are not accepting it.The second reference I provided was from this website http://www.tieku.org/272239/87.html it is a useful website all encounters written here are taken from reliable resources as famous tiger expert Kailash Sankhala and Valmik Thapar and also from T.v channels(Discovery channel and Animal planet)if these are not accepted than wikipedia is fake because these are authentic reports

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for evasion of block.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

.