User talk:Sam Sailor/Archive 5
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
YHWH OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS ARTICLE
Sam the article that I submitted was not a duplicate. I wrote an article that was rejected because it was thought to not have enough original material, so I wrote another article and submitted it for review. The article that you referenced was not a duplicate, it was the original draft which was not under review. Please review the article submitted so that the correct edits and changes can be made.
Best Yisrael — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoshyhwh (talk • contribs) 01:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- The draft, User:Yoshyhwh/YHWH OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS gives the impression of a Wikipedia:Coatrack. Please read Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:36, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sam, could you please reopen this AfD? I am finding that sock puppetry was involved in the voting (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mirrortoamermaid), and after you reopen it, I intend to alter some of the votes based on that finding. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:42, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: It's reopened. Looking forward to see the outcome. Ought I have noticed myself and stayed away from NACing it? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:18, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Sam. I'm not sure I expect the outcome to be different, but obviously the closer has to ignore the vote by one IP and the comment by the other. I don't think you could have been expected to notice the problem. Of course, it's always suspicious when IPs or new accounts come out of the woodwork and vote at AfD, but the most telling thing here was that one of the IPs altered the formatting of the master's vote, but I doubt that closers look at the AfD history unless they have good reason to do so.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Submission declined on 22 February 2015 by Sam Sailor (talk).
Dear Sam,
If you have the time could you please look again at the Draft:A Young Man's Gash article? There are a lot more citations and references added.
Yours, York York Earwaker (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- @York Earwaker: I looked at all sources (bar 1 web page that does not load and 1 Gbook that has no preview), and none provides significant coverage. I don't believe it meets WP:NALBUMS. It is unusual to create an article on a recording, when an article on the band, Gash (band), does not already exist. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 02:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Sam, The story of Prog Rock is one off collaborations like this one. There is unlikely ever to be a article on the band Gash as the band disbanded after making this album, the only one they ever created. The album is the story of the band. Wikipedia will never have the story of Prog Rock without referencing lots of these one off productions. A similar one off would be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32yY39B1EsA Brave New World - Impressions on reading Aldous Huxley (1972) York Earwaker (talk) 23:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- @York Earwaker: Dear York, I understand you, but you are up against the notability guidelines that have been developed by the community over the years to determine what can and what should not be included. If you follow WP:AfD over a period of time you'd be surprised to see who many song/single/album articles by more mainstream bands are being deleted or redirected because of lack of notability. Did you consider posting about the album on Progressive Rock Wiki? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 11:17, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Sam, Many thanks for the steer to the Prog Rock Wiki. I'll use that going forward for this type of content. York Earwaker (talk) 22:10, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- @York Earwaker: Dear York, I understand you, but you are up against the notability guidelines that have been developed by the community over the years to determine what can and what should not be included. If you follow WP:AfD over a period of time you'd be surprised to see who many song/single/album articles by more mainstream bands are being deleted or redirected because of lack of notability. Did you consider posting about the album on Progressive Rock Wiki? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 11:17, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Sam, The story of Prog Rock is one off collaborations like this one. There is unlikely ever to be a article on the band Gash as the band disbanded after making this album, the only one they ever created. The album is the story of the band. Wikipedia will never have the story of Prog Rock without referencing lots of these one off productions. A similar one off would be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32yY39B1EsA Brave New World - Impressions on reading Aldous Huxley (1972) York Earwaker (talk) 23:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Request on 19:20:58, 27 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by DRnlhodges
- DRnlhodges (talk · contribs)
Hi Sam! Thank you for the quick review. In response to your suggestions:
1. You recommended I remove ALL the publications from the 'references' section because there is a representative publications section. However, not ALL of the publications in the references section are in the representative publications section. Suggestions?
2. You wanted secondary sources. I've included two. One is a published interview with Dr. Bochner written by another prominent Communication Scholar. The other is Dr. Bochner's profile on Left Coast Press, the book publishing company which has published several of his books and book series. How do you suggest I include them? Also, he is written about and cited extensively in the 'autoethnography' Wikipedia page which I've linked on the page.
Holman Jones, S. (2004). Building connections in qualitative research: Carolyn Ellis and Art Bochner in conversation with Stacy Holman Jones. 5,3: 28. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/552/1194.
http://www.lcoastpress.com/books_author.php?id=42
Thank you!
nathan
DRnlhodges (talk) 19:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- @DRnlhodges: Nathan, it's in mainspace now. Thanks! -- Sam Sailor Talk! 02:08, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Request on 07:19:14, 2 March 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Cameron Cunningham
Hi,
You recently rejected an article called skin to skin contact becaue you needed me to add a lead and correct some abbreviations. I did so and resubmitted but now its been rejected again stating that the article alredy exists as Kangaroo Care. The two terms are very different as I discuss in the new lead. Please can you help to approve it.
Thanks Cam
Cameron Cunningham (talk) 07:19, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Cameron Cunningham: Cam, I understand you say there is a difference, and my starting point is that I want to believe this to be true, but to verify that we need the ful citations, not the short ones. If you need help with this, drop me a line. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 08:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Request on 09:14:47, 2 March 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mahi kapoor
- Mahi kapoor (talk · contribs)
Kindly guide me on the article - Bodhtree submitted for the approval which has declined saying This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia.
Mahi kapoor (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Mahi kapoor: Sounds like something copied off the company's about page. What would it sound like if you only used secondary sources and wrote in your own words? For inspiration on writing better articles about companies and organizations read Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies/Guidelines. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 09:20, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Talk! Hi Sam have incorporated the changes as per the guidelines. Kindly guide me.Mahi kapoor (talk) 10:06, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
A trout
You forgot to remove the AfD template. --Fauzan✆ talk✉ mail 12:00, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Fauzan: Closures are done by script, and I have not seen this situation before. In this case TW first created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malaun and then tagged Malaun which may be the reason. I have reported the scenario. Thanks for staying alert and cleaning up. Best, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
11:20:21, 2 March 2015 review of submission by Cacovell
My entry was rejected because of not having "context". I sent an email to the editor, Tony Sailor, and the email has been returned. I am not sure how to proceed.
Cacovell (talk) 11:20, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Cacovell: The draft in your sandbox according to your edit summary is "based on my personal experience. Freeman is my great great grandfather and we recently visited his grave site in Alicante". It appears at best to be the very last part of what could be a biographical article. It does however needs to be sourced. So unless somebody wrote about your grandfather, it will be difficult to meet the requirements here. Please read WP:NOTMEMORIAL. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 11:37, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Cacovell, the person you are writing about is Edward Augustus Freeman, who already has an article. If you wish to add a section on his death and burial to that article, simply do so. However, I strongly suggest adding a reference for the paragraph about his death and burial prior to the grave inscription. The Articles for Creation/Draft submission process is solely for creating completely new articles. Hope that helps. Voceditenore (talk) 13:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Voceditenore:
Orz...Ref -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Voceditenore:
Entry for E. A. Freeman
Thank you for your message. Actually it was my intention to add my entry under Biography for E. A. Freeman, and not to create a new article. But I guess I selected the wrong procedure. I think I can find a source for the inscription on his graveCacovell (talk) 13:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Sedona Sky Academy - Copper Canyon Academy
Hello Sam Sailor, I am Msampson10, and I made significant changes to the Sedona Sky Academy wiki page. As you can tell, I am new to this. However, as their marketing manager, and in close communication with owners Tammy Behrmann, Darren Prince, and John Gordon of Family Help & Wellness, I was asked to set the record straight. I accept that I probably didn't follow wiki protocol to a tee, but I provided reliable sources to the facts and dates. In a nutshell, there's controversy surrounding now closed Copper Canyon Academy, and this same controversy attached itself to Sedona Sky Academy (despite new owners, new staff, and new program philosophy). Our mission is to clarify the differences and separation of the two facilities. So my question to you is, can you (or I) delete the old Copper Canyon Academy wiki page vs. just redirecting it to the Sedona Sky wiki page? Obviously we are desiring less affiliation with CCA, and the redirect keeps CCA and SSA connected. Thanks for your time. Msampson10 Msampson10 (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Msampson10. I assume you turn to me because I reverted the blanking of the redirect from Copper Canyon Academy to Sedona Sky Academy. Thank you for being upfront with where you come from and what your goal is, hats off for that. It's a conflict of interest but I hope it can be dealt with gracefully; please give Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with close associations a read.
- To answer your question: the redirect Copper Canyon Academy would only be deleted after a discussion.
- I've had a short read on Sedona Sky Academy and its editing history, and a very short search for reliable sources regarding the negative claims made about the institution under it's old name, Copper Canyon Academy. I think the best thing to do now is to get other editors involved in this matter. To accomplish that I will repost you message above on Talk:Sedona Sky Academy, and send a notice to users who have edited the article. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Sam, thanks for involving me. While I understand that something has changed, I do have COI concerns and it seems that some continuity was maintained between the institutions. I put a longer explanation on the article's talk page. Raymie (t • c) 16:30, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Raymie, I understand and share your concerns. I have added
{{Talk header}}
,{{COI editnotice}}
, and{{Connected contributor}}
to the article talk page. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:58, 1 March 2015 (UTC)- Thank you Sam Sailor and Raymie for your willingness to look at this issue. Obviously, I was unaware of the COI Best Practices when I edited SSA wiki page. I'm sorry for that.. However, as you can see, I avoided any "sales-speak" or embelishments and stuck to the facts with good citations. Hopefully, you will all take this into consideration. I intentionally left out slanderous, but factual comments regarding how Copper Canyon Academy was run to the ground under the ownership of Aspen/CRC Health. In the same way that they ran Island View Residential Treatment Center into the ground (reputation repair that is next on the docket for Family Help & Wellness). Sedona Sky Academy has diff ownership, diff mgmt, diff names, diff programming, mostly diff staff. One would find similarities in programming if you went down the street to another TBS or RTC. This, as you would agree, doesn't mean Spring Ridge Academy = Sedona Sky Academy any more than Copper Canyon = Sedona Sky or Copper Canyon = Spring Ridge. In the end, SSA owners would like a separation from Copper Canyon. The Sedona Sky Academy knowledge graph has been a nightmare as of late (KG image last week had a mugshot of a CCA staff member from years ago, that we labored to get removed). And these KG issues began about the same time that the CCA wiki page was redirected to the Sedona Sky Academy wiki page. Thanks for your consideration. Msampson10 (talk) 16:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Also, regarding the Conflict of Interest, you should know that I am not an employee of either Tammy Behrmann, Darren Prince, or Family Help & Wellness. Neither have I received "financial compensation" for the wiki edits. All three mentioned above have hired Zyndio Online Marketing for their SEO. I work for Zyndio as a 1099 contractor. If this helps the COI issue.. Thanks Msampson10 (talk) 17:18, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Raymie, I understand and share your concerns. I have added
- Sam, thanks for involving me. While I understand that something has changed, I do have COI concerns and it seems that some continuity was maintained between the institutions. I put a longer explanation on the article's talk page. Raymie (t • c) 16:30, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
References February 27, 2015
Hello Sam,
You recently edited my article (on an intellectual property boutique in Ottawa: Jensen & Company) and refused it on account of the references. I placed two independent references, in addition to the company website, in the article. As I am told that this is the minimum, what exactly was the problem? There aren't many other references online and I don't expect the article to be much longer than it is right now. What can I do to help it pass through?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heid Jense (talk • contribs) 20:30, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Heid Jense: Hi Heid, one of the two non-primary sources is a directory listing at Ottawa Chamber of Commerce, the other is an even shorter listing at Canadian Intellectual Property Office. None of them are significant. Please follow and read the links in the pink box in the draft to get some guidance. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 02:30, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sam,
The reason why I chose those listings as references was to support the claims in the text. As the actions of the company can only be legally carried out by a company/agent that is listed in these bodies, the listings therefore support the claims I found on the website. 14:40 EST, March 2, 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heid Jense (talk • contribs) 19:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
22:31:04, 1 March 2015 review of submission by Nestor-bogdan
What would be considered valid references? Do you mean that you require English-language references?
Nestor-bogdan (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Nestor-bogdan: Hi Nestor, no, they don't have to be English, WP:NONENG. If you just stick in say three URLs in ref tags and leave me a message here, I will run Reflinks on the draft and publish it. If any of this is Greek to you, just let me know. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 22:37, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Sam
Here is a link that talks about his involvement in Rukh and its forerunner Prosvita, and the fact that he is the head editor of Zhuravlik : http://referatu.net.ua/referats/7569/175243/?page=1
Here is a link written on the occasion of his 75th birthday that talks about his scientific and academic achievements: http://www-nuclear.univer.kharkov.ua/russ/p10_4_92.htm
Here is a link that confirms his presence in the Rukh splinter party DPU, from when he ran for elections in 1998: http://www.cvk.gov.ua/pls/vd2002/WEBPROC3V?kodvib=1&kodkand=2027 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nestor-bogdan (talk • contribs) 02:34, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
RE: review of submission by Nestor-bogdan
First of all, sorry for writing this in multiple spaces. I wrote this in two other places before I figured out where it's supposed to be written (Wikipedia talk interface is a tad confusing). Original message follows:
Hello, Sam
Here is a link that talks about his involvement in Rukh and its forerunner Prosvita, and the fact that he is the head editor of Zhuravlik : http://referatu.net.ua/referats/7569/175243/?page=1
Here is a link written on the occasion of his 75th birthday that talks about his scientific and academic achievements: http://www-nuclear.univer.kharkov.ua/russ/p10_4_92.htm
Here is a link that confirms his presence in the Rukh splinter party DPU, from when he ran for elections in 1998: http://www.cvk.gov.ua/pls/vd2002/WEBPROC3V?kodvib=1&kodkand=2027 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nestor-bogdan (talk • contribs) 02:37, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
11:44:37, 3 March 2015 review of submission by Stufe
Hi,
I am new to Wikipedia and trying to create a page for a European funded project. One of the 'deliverables' on the project is to create this Wikipedia page.
I see the page has been rejected as I have not included enough references to make the project notable enough.
There is a website for the project www.opti-wind.eu which explains the project and it's funding from the EU. Would including this reference be enough for the page to be accepted? If not could you provide some feedback on what else I need to do to the page so that it is accepted?
Your help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks
Stuart
Stufe (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- It would not be enough with the project website. Please follow and read the links in the pink box in the draft to get some guidance. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 18:30, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Robert Awards statuette logo.png
![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Awards statuette logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
re: February 2015
Dear Sam, this is in response to your message regarding edit-warring left on my talk page. I fully understand the rules of engagement and editing on Wikipedia. However, there appears to be a collaborative effort to vandalize the Kurds page for political purposes, namely Iranians/Persians and/or advocates of a view that Kurds have an Iranian/Persian identity. Please have a look at the lead, which I will quote here:
"The Kurds (Kurdish: کورد Kurd) are an ethnic Iranian group in the Middle East, mostly inhabiting a contiguous area spanning adjacent parts of modern-day Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey, a geo-cultural region often referred to as "Kurdistan". The Kurds are an Iranian people and speak the Kurdish languages, which form a subgroup of the Northwestern Iranian branch of Iranian languages."
As you can see, there are 3 occasions within these two sentences that the Kurds are labeled "Iranians". There is no reason why the lead should mention that Kurds are "Iranian" 3 times. This is not helpful, not objective nor academic, and it is redundant. I have the personal view based on a number of resources that the classification of Kurds as Iranian is false. However, since some users have been insistent on this classification, I have left the mention of Kurds being classified as such within the lead. The only thing I have done is removed the redundancies in order to improve the quality of this Wikipedia article. My proposed alteration of the lead is the following:
"The Kurds (Kurdish: کورد Kurd) are an ethnic group in the Middle East, mostly inhabiting a contiguous area spanning adjacent parts of modern-day Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey, a geo-cultural region often referred to as "Kurdistan". The Kurds are speak the Kurdish languages, which form a subgroup of the Northwestern Iranian branch of Iranian languages."
I have already taken this to the Kurds Talk Page in the past. After several discussions and debates with other Wikipedia members, we agreed on the terms. However, every time I return I see that people are changing the article again to include the redundancies, and quite frankly, inserting their subjective views. I do not believe I am edit-warring. I am simply attempting to clean the article (as well as take it back to a state that we had previously agreed) but others are constantly changing it back. Your further input is welcome.
Thank you.
- Please sign your posts on talk pages per Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages. Thanks!
- Dear Sharisna, thanks for your confidence in me. What, in your own words, is the difference between "Iranian" and "Iranian people"? Best, -- Sam Sing! 09:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Sam Sailor, Iranian people in a modern context are the citizens of the nation-state of Iran. While there are Kurds living in Iran and who are citizens of Iran, the majority of Kurds are indigenous to Turkey, Iraq, and Syria and are not Iranian people. Therefore, it's confusing to readers when the article is stating that Kurds are Iranian people. The sources that some Wikipedia users cite are writers that classify Kurds as "Iranian" based on linguistics. That is why I think it is sufficient based on such sources to mention the Kurdish language group as being classified as Iranian, rather than defining Kurds as Iranian, which is both misleading as well as debatable. The history of the Kurds is not entirely clear and the linguistic classification is based purely on the similarities between Kurdish languages and Persian. In addition, it really makes little sense to state this 3 different times in two sentences within the lead. It's simply redundant. Thanks for taking the time to read this and considering my arguments. -- User:Sharisna 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Sharisna, thanks for WP:INDENTing your message, you are doing great! If you end your messages witn
~~~~
they will both be signed and dated. So simple, when you get the hang of it. - Just for one moment let us put the question about Kurds aside. Please have a look at Baloch people. Just read the WP:LEAD, the lead is the part of the article that comes before the Contents box. What do you think? Is the text good as it is now? -- Sam Sing! 02:54, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Sharisna, thanks for WP:INDENTing your message, you are doing great! If you end your messages witn
- Hi Sam Sailor, thank you. Sorry for the delay; I was on holiday. I have had a look at the Baloch people. I think it, too, is redundant for the same reasons. However it is far less so than the Kurds lead has been at various times. It is funny to see this debate live on Wikipedia because Kurds actually have very famous old songs where they deny being Iranian but that is a whole other topic I suppose! In any case, I think it is fine to leave the statement about linguistic classification of Kurdish as being Iranian in the lead, but adding more references to Iranian is both confusing and redundant for the reasons I previously stated. Thanks for the tip on how to add a signature to my messages. I was wondering how to do that. Sharisna (talk) 01:23, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Have a look at the recent changes to the article following the RFC on Talk:Kurds. I am neither Kurd nor Iranian, so for me it is easy not to get upset by this matter. I can understand why a Kurd might not feel the same way. Best, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Article title
Hello Sam, Thank you for reviewing my concept for a Wikipedia article. I suggest as article title: "Cyanocobalamin - The Origin of Diseases" Wimbartx (talk) 10:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- That sounds like a WP:POVTITLE to me, but as you wish. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:36, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
I hope you can accept the title, since it really corresponds quite well to the description given in the article. Wimbartx (talk) 10:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- I moved the sandbox to the title suggested and left a note on WT:MED asking for comments. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
In view of WP:POVTITLE and a more neutral point of view, I propose another more appropriate title for my Draft.
Will you please change the title in: "Cyanocobalamin - Vitamin B12 deficiency".
I have also improved the text and have done wikification of the References as proposed by Doc James in WT:MED.
All bar urls have been removed now and only references valid for Wikipedia are given in the right format.
Wimbartx (talk) 06:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Wimbartx, I believe you have sufficient user rights now to perform a move to another title yourself. If not, drop me a line and I will do it. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Sam for the info. I succeeded to move the Draft so that it has now the new Title. Everything is fine now. Wimbartx (talk) 14:15, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
New article submission 3D SLASH (3d odeling software)
Hello Sam
I deeply thank you for your advices on my article about 3D Slash. In order to correct it, I added references within the article. I'm not sure about adding them twice at the end of my article. I did not found the "3" button to informed that i've checked my internet updates Then i'm asking : do you think it will fit ? another question : should i register on the French wikipedia portal to get this article in French as well ? Thanks again for your encouragments & great support you can reach me on my talk page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MagaliStLaurent or by email saintaurent.magali@gmail.com have a nice day magali
MagaliStLaurent (talk) 14:28, 5 March 2015 (UTC)MagaliStLaurentMagaliStLaurent (talk) 14:28, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Magali. We use Wikipedia:Unified login, so you can just start editing on :fr:w or any other project. I removed the duping refs, and ran reFill on the draft. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 14:38, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Eric Thorngren Submission: denied
Hi Sam. I'm confused by your rejection of Eric Thorngren's page. He's already referenced over 50 times on Wikipedia[1] for his work as a recording engineer and producer. And he's referenced over 400 times on discogs [2]. I'm happy to reference the Discogs work, although another editor rejected discogs as being unreliable(???) Any suggestions? Thanks! Woodchucksh3166 (talk) 15:58, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
17:57:17, 5 March 2015 review of submission by Jeannef802
- Jeannef802 (talk · contribs)
Hi Sam,
First, thank you for the feedback and detailed explanation about why our first submission was rejected. We are learning. We have followed your guidelines and re-written the page more objectively (hopefully) focusing on eliminating the "advertorial" elements by including citations and information from very objective media pieces on the industry. I've pasted the draft of the edited submission below and would very much appreciate your feedback on whether this is ready for submission, and if not, what we might do to increase the chances of it being accepted. Again- this is a learning process and we want to do what's necessary to make it fit Wikipedia's guidelines.
SmileCareClub, Nashville, TN, a teledentistry[3] company, is bringing {{telehealth}}[4] to the dental and orthodontic industries. The company provides orthodontic teeth straightening for patients with mild to moderate {{malocclusion}} using a series of clear plastic aligners to gradually adjust teeth. The virtual procedure, done by the patient at home at a lower cost, is overseen by an affiliated dental professional (licensed in the patient’s state).[5] The treatment is appropriate for patients age 15 and over and not recommended for severe orthodontic issues.[6] SmileCareClub rebrands and repackages the FDA-approved invisible aligners.[7]
As the dental and orthodontic professions adapt to improved connectivity and increased insurance coverage for remote treatments, new and disruptive delivery methods have emerged.[8] Many professionals have resisted the change, but more complicated cases are referred to participating professionals.[9] Support from the professional and academic dental community is developing with certain caveats. They appreciate that telehealth technology has leveraged access and is expanding care to people who could not afford orthodontics and support companies that are setting the proper protocol and providing teledentistry treatment only to patients over 15 years of age with simple to moderate tooth movement needed.[10] The telehealth industry increased 400% in 2012 (one in six visits were virtual in 2014) in the U.S.[11]
There has been opposition from dentists, orthodontists and professional boards.[12] Some professionals feel that patients who don’t go for regular check-ups are more likely to experience complications.[13] In the absence of dental visits, unseen problems may go undiagnosed, affecting oral and overall health.[14] Regulations and insurance reimbursements vary by state in the U.S.[15] Telemedicine is affordable and convenient for the patient and expands access to care to diverse economic and geographic communities.[16] Each year American consumers spend $100 billion on their teeth. The increasing choice of teledentistry for the patient population is creating a change in the orthodontic profession.[17]
References
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=eric+thorngren&go=Go
- ^ http://www.discogs.com/artist/465792-Eric-Thorngren
- ^ Jampani, Nutalapati (June 29, 2012). "Applications of Teledentistry: A literature review and update". Journal of Int. Soc. of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 1 (2): 37 - 44.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Smith, Ernie. [www.associationsnow.com "Don't Try This At Home: Orthodontists Warn Against Home Remedies"]. Associations Now. Retrieved 5 March 2015.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ Smith, Ernie. [www.associationsnow.com "Don't Try This at Home: Orthodontists Warn Against Home Remedies"]. Associations Now. Retrieved 5 March 2015.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ "Meet SmileCareClub". The Progressive Orthodontist. Q1 2015: 33.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ "FDA". FDA.gov. FDA.
{{cite web}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Missing or empty|url=
(help) - ^ Kennedy, Eleanor. [www.bizjournals.com "Telemedicine: Where it works best"]. Nashville Business Journal. Retrieved 5 March 2015.
{{cite news}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ "Meet SmileCareClub". The Progressive Orthodontist. Q1 2015: 33.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Levine DMD, Jonathan (Feb. 6, 2015). "Do It Yourself Orthodonture". Fox5 News WNYW.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "eVisits: the 21st century housecall". Deloitte. 2014.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ "Meet SmileCareClub". The Progressive Orthodontis. Q1 2015: 33.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Smith, Ernie. [www.associationsnow.com "Don't Try This at HOme: Orthodontists Warn Against Home Remedies"]. Associations Now. Retrieved 5 March 2015.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ "eVisits: the 21st century housecall". Deloitte. 2014.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Saint Louis, Catherine (Feb. 1, 2015). "Straighter Teeth by Mail". New York Times. Well Blog New York Times.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Strong, Bernadette (Feb. 4, 2015). [www.youthhealthmag.com "Do-It-Yourself Tooth Straightening? No. Mail Order Orthodontics? Maybe"]. Youth Health Magazine. Retrieved 5 March 2015.
{{cite journal}}
: Check|url=
value (help); Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Jones, Sheinelle (Feb. 26, 2015). "Bracing for Change". The Today Show, Money. NBC News.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Check date values in:|date=
(help)
Thanks for your time and advice in helping us get this done.
Best regards, JeanneJeannef802 (talk) 17:57, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Jeannef802 (talk) 17:57, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- This is a classical example of how difficult it is for some or most people to write objectively in an area where they have a WP:COI. And what's with the content forking? Advice: write about something else than your company. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 20:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Tom Doshi page
I removed the redirect on the page Tom Doshi with the intention to update it with its own info. Unfortunately i didn't have time in that specific moment. Tom Doshi has gained some great public attention in Albania lately. You reverted my edit because the page was blank... So, I suppose it is OK if I add some info to Tom Doshi and remove the redirect?--Mr. Pseudo (talk) 16:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Mr. Pseudo, yeah, absolutely. If you had given an edit summary, I would not have reverted per WP:BLANK. Best, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 20:42, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 March 2015
- From the editor: A sign of the times: the Signpost revamps its internal structure to make contributing easier
- Traffic report: Attack of the movies
- Arbitration report: Bradspeaks—impact, regrets, and advice; current cases hinge on sex, religion, and ... infoboxes
- Interview: Meet a paid editor
- Featured content: Ploughing fields and trading horses with Rosa Bonheur
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Message from Michaelmayer555
Hi Sam.
You have rejected my submission for 'Martin Ross' the actor on 26th Feb. I am new to this and would like to submit more actors from the UK moving forward. Having read the Sandbox instructions etc am not entirely sure what is meant by 'secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.' Hoping you are able to enlighten me so as I can get started and my first entry on. Kind regards. Michael. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelmayer555 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Judging from Ross' IMDb entry, this is not the most obvious subject to start with if you want to write stubs on British actors: his career is short and the productions are not especially notable. So it might be a case of WP:TOOSOON but it all depends on what kind of sources you can find on Ross. Those added now does not fulfil neither WP:NACTOR nor WP:BASIC. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 20:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Request on 00:00:03, 6 March 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Vega el mas Buscado(Rapper)
Hi I have being trying to figure out this article editing for Vega el mas Buscado(Rapper) Wikipedia page and I am having a hard time doing it. Is there a way to have someone do it for me? I truly don't know how to manage the requirements to successfully finish editing this page and officially publish it. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you --Vega el mas Buscado(Rapper) 00:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Vega el mas Buscado(Rapper) 00:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- You should keep on doing what I hope makes you happy: making music. If in the future secondary sources support your notability, somebody will write an article about you, but you should not do it yourself. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 08:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
14:12:53, 6 March 2015 review of submission by Dredmorbius
- Dredmorbius (talk · contribs)
Hi. I'm having a really hard time grokking how the present president and CEO of NPR isn't notable. I've added additional cites from numerous sources to the article.
It is a stub, yes, but I'd created it out of surprise that there wasn't one already existing. More at the TeaHouse.
Dredmorbius (talk) 14:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Looks good. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 14:21, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi @SamSailor! My submission for "National Abitration and Mediation" was recently declined by you as a result of sounding "too much like an advertisement." I made some changes and resubmitted the page but I was hoping you could offer me some additional feedback regarding what in particulr I can change to make the page more suitable for wikipedia. Thank you for your time and consideration as any advice would greatly help! 16:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC)~~@ATomNAM 3/6/15 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ATomNAM (talk • contribs)
We Players Should be ready for article space
This article certainly meets the criteria of NPOV, notability and non-promotional language and is, at least, a start class article. I recommend moving it to mainspace.
Test
Sorry about that. Onel5969 (talk) 16:37, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- No prob. Best, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 16:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
16:46:04, 7 March 2015 review of submission by Michaelmayer555
Michaelmayer555 (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC) Hello.
I am not sure I understand why this was declined? Would you kindly elnighten me? I thought I had given enough evidence of Mr Ross's acting career and award nominated film. I intend to enter a list of UK actors moving forward. Thank you so much for your assistance. Please would you also kindly email me at: michaelmayer555@gmail.com Kind regards. Michael.
- Please read my reply above when you asked the first time around. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 16:49, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
RE: review of submission by Nestor-bogdan (2)
Hello, Sam
Writing this message again in case you haven't gotten my old one yet. I'm repeating my reply. I look forward to hearing from you
Original reply:
Hello, Sam
Here is a link that talks about his involvement in Rukh and its forerunner Prosvita, and the fact that he is the head editor of Zhuravlik : http://referatu.net.ua/referats/7569/175243/?page=1
Here is a link written on the occasion of his 75th birthday that talks about his scientific and academic achievements: http://www-nuclear.univer.kharkov.ua/russ/p10_4_92.htm
Here is a link that confirms his presence in the Rukh splinter party DPU, from when he ran for elections in 1998: http://www.cvk.gov.ua/pls/vd2002/WEBPROC3V?kodvib=1&kodkand=2027 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nestor-bogdan (talk • contribs) 02:34, 3 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nestor-bogdan (talk • contribs)
- Nestor-bogdan, submit the draft again and I will move it into mainspace. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:19, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Reverts
What is the problem here Mr. Sam Sailor? — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation 12:15, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Article review for submission
Thanks for the feedback Sam,
Can you help me on this one, Similar brand exist on wikipedia like popjustice, gigwise etc though? It does seem notable with good solid references. The brand is linked in on many other pages on this site I see too.
RE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mark_Meets IanMECoyleIanMeCoyle (talk) 10:19, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
04:01:46, 25 February 2015 review of submission by Yogthos
Hi Sam,
Could you please elaborate as to what other references that need to be provided. Selmer is a templating engine for Clojure, similar templating engines such as Jinja https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jinja_(template_engine) and Twig https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twig_(template_engine) have been approved.
Jinja only has a single reference that happens to be its website, yet I provided multiple references for Selmer and that is deemed insufficient.
Selmer currently has over 25 thousand downloads https://clojars.org/selmer and is one of the more popular templating engines for Clojure. I'm not sure I understand what specifically you're looking for in terms of notability and what makes it less notable than engines such as Jinja and Twig.
Regards, Dmitri
Yogthos (talk) 04:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Dimitri. As you can see, Jinja (template engine) has been tagged since 2013 as unreferenced. Would you like to add refs? It is not a valid argument to say that because some other article is insufficient, another one should be allowed to be as well, is it. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST. If Selmer is popular, there's got to be somebody who has written about it. Has it been mentioned in any books? Best, -- Sam Sing! 04:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Sam. Selmer has three books referencing it currently, both of which are available on Amazon and other major retailers.
Clojure Cookbook http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920029786.do
Web Development with Clojure http://www.amazon.com/Web-Development-Clojure-Build-Bulletproof/sim/1937785645/2
Clojure Web Development Essentials http://www.amazon.com/Clojure-Development-Essentials-Ryan-Baldwin/dp/1784392227
Would you agree that this counts as sufficient notability?
Regards, Dmitri — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yogthos (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Regarding draft:Light Combat Aircraft
Thanks for reviewing my draft, i did, most of the ref came from wiki articles references regarding details. Still searching for other references online that might support or contradict the term so far i can't find any. If you search LCA it always give you the Hal Tejas. Maybe other might contribute to it. Did i understand you right? Or are you asking me to link others to the draft? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Efram23 (talk • contribs) 10:13, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Efram23, look at what I did with the third ref, that was what I had in mind. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:24, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Sam Sailor Got it. Thanks and done. You may check it whenever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Efram23 (talk • contribs) 11:06, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Please sign your posts on talk pages per Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages. Thanks!
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. - Light Combat Aircraft already exists in mainspace, but only as a redirect. We need one from the "mop gang" (=admins) to do the move. Make a new section on your talk page. Put
{{Admin help}}
in and explain the dilemma. Hell, we'll do it here, right? Saves some typing. Best, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 11:16, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Done. JohnCD (talk) 13:03, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, JohnCD. Preferences → Gadgets → Yet Another AFC Helper Script takes the hassle out of the job. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Silvio Wolf
Hi Sam!
I would be grateful to you if you could give me your opinion on my page on Silvio Wolf, which you already reviewed days ago, here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Silvio_Wolf Please, can you tell me if the references are now fine? I added all the possible links and ISBN. Some may be missing only because they are old editions and may not be available online. Shall I leave them? (Especially article and essays)
Thank you so much! Looking forward to your reply.
GVndl (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- GVndl, submit it, and I'll move it into mainspace (article space), notability can't be questioned here. Best, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 15:36, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Submission declined
Hello,
You have declined my draft article on BC Safety Authority based on the claim that the "submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BC_Safety_Authority
Can you explain why this would be? The references refer to the organization's official publications as well as the legislation itself. How is it any different than WorkSafeBC's article, which seems to be very similar? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorkSafeBC
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quinn newcomb (talk • contribs) 21:27, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- WP:OSE. Which areas were you interested in editing apart from your draft? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 23:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand... I want to get my draft approved so people can learn about the organization. It is a legitimate organization with notability, as per references referring to specific legislation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quinn newcomb (talk • contribs) 23:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Msg from Ragnaregg re Draft:Tempo
Hello Sam,
Thank you for reviewing the Tempo article, this is my first time creating a new Wikipedia page and I'm sure there are many things I'm not getting right. I am trying to keep as neutral a tone as possible and would like to know if there's anything specifically that you would change. Although, I would point to the pages of some of the collaborators and competitors of Tempo which seem to be employing a similar tone as the one I used: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V1_Ltd - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JIRA - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrike
I firmly believe that Tempo should have its own wikipedia page, it was part of a publicly traded company until recently, has many notable clients, has participated in many forums and conferences in the field and is widely-known in its field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragnaregg (talk • contribs) 09:24, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
11:06:47, 11 March 2015 review of submission by 92.23.155.241
Hi Sam
You have recently declined the article below:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Wave_2_Growth_Hub_Program
This is the second time it has been declined. I made all the changes suggested to me by the last reviewer and the people on live chat before submitting it a second time and they said they thought it should be OK. Could you be a bit more specific about what changes I need to make. I have tried to keep the tone neutral and cited a number of external pieces of press about the programme. This is a national UK programme supported by government and I believe it is notable enough to deserve a wiki page. Any help you can give me to make the amendments required to get this published would be really helpful. Could you let me know which parts that need to be changed?
Thanks
Nikki
92.23.155.241 (talk) 11:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Require assistance in understanding the requirement for Wikipedia to accept the contents of my draft.- By Victim 86
Hi Sam I refer to my draft for the above. I am baffled as to why despite submitting all information that is required, the draft is still unacceptable.
The following notes appear under my draft:
This biography of a living person does not include any references or sources. (February 2015) The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies. (February 2015) This article needs more links to other articles to help integrate it into the encyclopedia. (February 2015) This article should be divided into sections by topic, to make it more accessible. (February 2015)
I have made reference to the titles of the 2 magazines, the headers on the covers on these magazines, the pages that I have extracted the information from, the name of the authors, the pages from our local newspapers in Singapore etc.
I believe the only challenge that your office may face for verification would be to find these magazines from the year 1987- which took me about 18 months of effort to locate them.
I also paid a substantial amount to purchase the hard and soft copies of these magazines. I have written in several times to Mr Axl Matulic with regards to this article but apparently despite his relentless effort to assist me (for which I am very obliged), I somehow cant seem to meet the mark. I would like to state that the purpose of my wanting to display this article is to hopefully prevent this ex-fugitive, current bankrupt and con-artist from cheating more members of the public as he has during the last 28 years.
Regards Victim86 03:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.127.127.102 (talk)
- @Victim86, Mohinani88, and Amatulic:
- From what you write I can understand that you have been in off-Wiki contact with Axl Matulic who judging from a Google search is User:Amatulic who tagged Draft:Deepak Kanyalal Nandwani in February. I think the draft will benefit from an open discussion, and I therefore answer you here.
- It is to me a bit unclear if your 5 March edits are attempts to add citations including quotes from the two magazines? Proper
{{Cite journal}}
s would look something like this:- Deutsch, Robin (January 1987). "The Scandalous Saga of Santennis". TENNIS magazine. New York, USA: Miller Publishing Group: 50–53.
- Deutsch, Robin (January 1987). "Mail Order Racket Exposed". Golf Digest. USA: Condé Nast Publications: 22–25.
- Interestingly here: http://www.engagingnews.us/select/Nick-Seitz.html is what appears to be a snip from something called Magazine for Magazine Management about the two above articles and the loss the two magazines suffered on unpaid adds. Ah, here we have the article on HighBeam. I have apllied for Wikipedia:HighBeam access.
- I have been Googeling several strings, but most of my attempts have not been successful. I have however found this:
- "Santennis, Inc. in Tigard, OR - Bizapedia Profile". bizapedia.com. Retrieved 11 March 2015. -- not very interesting, just a directory listing that confirms the company existed back then.
- UPI (8 August 1986). "Sporting Goods Dealer Missing". The Bulletin. Retrieved 11 March 2015. -- vanished in early July while in New York
- AP (19 August 1986). "Sports Shorts". apnewsarchive.com. Retrieved 11 March 2015. -- older than your articles, worth quoting in it's entirety:
PORTLAND, ORE. PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) Police and customs officials in Singapore have seized sports equipment from the defunct Santennis Inc. mail-order company, authorities in Portland reported. The Portland-based Santennis sold cut-rate tennis and golf equipment by mail before it suddenly went out of business and its owner disappeared last month. Roy Geffen, postal inspector in charge of the Portland Division, said Singapore authorities detained a shipment of Santennis goods from the cargo ship C.R. Parris, which arrived in Singapore last week from Tokyo. Geffen said U.S. and Singapore customs officials were investigating possible technical violations of federal law on illegal export declarations and violations of Singapore's import laws. The export documents did not reflect the actual contents of the containerized cargo, which held "large quantities of golf clubs, tennis rackets and accessories," Geffen said. Santennis was operated by Deepak Kanyalal, 26, of Singapore, who used the name Peter Nandwani. Kanyalal and his brother, Chandru Kanya Nandwani, were identified as the consignees of the seized shipment. Santennis began retail operations in Portland about 14 months ago and quickly moved into mail-order sales. The company advertised in publications that included Golf Digest, Tennis and World Tennis, leaving them with unpaid advertising bills.
- "Sarasota Herald-Tribune - Google News Archive Search". news.google.com. 23 August 1986. Retrieved 11 March 2015. -- just a short snip about a customer being ripped off
- "Sporting Goods Executive Arrested". Eugene Register-Guard. 6 December 1987. Retrieved 11 March 2015.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|Author=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) -- this is interesting because it is a later source than the two January articles you have, and because it says Deepak Kanyalal was arrested and held in Aruba since October 1987.
- But that's all that can be found online, or all I was able to find. Our WP:BLP policy is strict for many reasons, and if the above plus the reference from Straits Times adds up to meet WP:BIO, and I'm a bit concerned about the section regarding Singapore in recent years and how much of that you can source, then the article at least needs a very dispassionate rewrite. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 15:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
La Bella Principessa
- Dear Sam,
You reverted my amendments to the page which is titled Portrait of a Young Fiancee, which I was trying to rename/re-title as La Bella Principessa, which is the title of the picture. Many of the references refer to books and articles about La Bella Principessa. Moreover, News or Book search using a search engine returns far more information about items relating to La Bella Principessa. Indeed, it is only Wikipedia that alludes to the Portrait of a Young Fiancee. Are you able to change the title to La Bella Principessa and remove the redirect page from Portrait of a Young Fiancee? JiffyJifster 11/03/2015 JiffyJifster (talk) 11:41, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- I have made zero edits in Portrait of a Young Fiancée so far, but since you bring the article to my attention I have looked at your edits in February, and as you introduce countless referencing errors by copy-pasting text from the article instead of doing it in edit view which would have retained the correct references, I am going to restore a previous version. I can tell from the article history that the subject is a delicate matter. Please go slow on editing and provide edit summaries for all edits.
- As for the article title it was Young Girl in Profile in Renaissance Dress when created in 2009, which is very close to Chritie's title Head of a Young Girl in Profile to the Left in Renaissance Dress. On 22 February 2012, Amandajm moved it to "La Bella Principessa", Sailko moved it to So-called Bella Principessa an hour later, and Amandajm moved it the next day to Portrait of a Young Fiancée. According to Janice Koch (1 January 2012). Science Stories: Science Methods for Elementary and Middle School Teachers. Cengage Learning. pp. 309–. ISBN 1-111-83343-5. the work was in 2008 titled Profile of a Young Fiancée (my emphasis, as opposed to Portrait), Martin Kemp then first called the work La Bella Milanese, but quote "there were complaints that it made her sound like a veal chop, so [...] Kemp gave her the name she now has, La Bella Principessa." This and a quick search leaves me with the impression that you might be right and that La Bella Principessa would find support per WP:COMMONNAME. However, as the title has previously been controversial, consensus should be reached on the article talk page first. If consensus decides that La Bella Principessa is the better choice, it just takes an admin to delete the current redirect to make way for the move. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 14:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- JiffyJifster, I copied the above to Talk:Portrait of a Young Fiancée making it a proposal to move to La Bella Principessa, and gave it my support. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 15:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Question on Decline of Robert Hanley
Hello, I noticed that you just declined the Robert Hanley page I submitted. I am a first time submitter and I added in references, form IMDB as well as the actor's personal website, and I don't understand why these are deemed unreliable? Is there something else that I am missing that you can be more specific on?
I do appreciate your help - I have been looking at the documentation, and I don't see why the citations wouldn't work for this.
Many thanks
Saviodesigns (talk) 00:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Chris
- Chris, as I wrote in my comment on the draft: "Hard to tell if subject is notable, as a number of Robert Hanleys seem to exist or have existed, but all refts now given are primary (from subject's webpage) or from IMDb, and secondary sources are needed." Please follow and read the links in the pink box in the draft to get some guidance. Maybe also Wikipedia:Your first article can serve as inspiration? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 16:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
UAA
(version which has these reports in) How are "Feet hands belly buttocks" and "DaielaHATESWIKI" not offensive? —George8211 / T 20:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Huh? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 20:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry. What I meant to say is reports of the user "Feet hands belly buttocks" and "DaielaHATESWIKI" have been declined. I don't get how they're not offensive. —George8211 / T 20:46, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well, unfortunately I'm not an admin, so you might want to ask that User: Diannaa who in both cases have applied her interpretation of WP:U in these cases. And I agree with you. Diannaa, your comments here are welcomed. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 21:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- It's a judgement call obviously, but neither of these usernames is a violation of the username policy in my opinion, though they're both borderline. Blocking should not be our first response in such borderline cases. In both cases, the user talk page is a red link; no one has made any effort (as recommended by the UAA instructions) to first discuss with the user and suggest that they choose a more appropriate user name. This is something anyone can do; you don't have to be an admin. -- Diannaa (talk) 21:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, it is (1) in no way "obvious" to me, and neither is it to George8211, why the user name DaielaHATESWIKI should not be in violation of WP:U. Why? That you (2) observe the user page is red-linked has AFAICT no relevance, but I welcome your policy based argument of the opposite, and (3) should you in contrast to the ARV reporter really how found that DaielaHATESWIKI is an appropriate user name, you should have utilized
{{uw-username}}
which you did not. Why not? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 22:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)- I can only repeat that I don't believe either of these usernames is a serious enough violation so as to warrant an immediate block without warning or discussion. In both cases, the user has not edited since March 5, and they are unlikely to return. You are free to add the
{{uw-username}}
template to their talk pages yourself, which will add them to the category Category:Wikipedia usernames with possible policy issues, but I myself will not be doing so, as I don't believe it's an issue. -- Diannaa (talk) 14:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)- By now there's probably not much point in sorting them out as it's been so long since they edited, but I'll never be able to mind-read other people. —George8211 / T 16:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- I can only repeat that I don't believe either of these usernames is a serious enough violation so as to warrant an immediate block without warning or discussion. In both cases, the user has not edited since March 5, and they are unlikely to return. You are free to add the
- No, it is (1) in no way "obvious" to me, and neither is it to George8211, why the user name DaielaHATESWIKI should not be in violation of WP:U. Why? That you (2) observe the user page is red-linked has AFAICT no relevance, but I welcome your policy based argument of the opposite, and (3) should you in contrast to the ARV reporter really how found that DaielaHATESWIKI is an appropriate user name, you should have utilized
- It's a judgement call obviously, but neither of these usernames is a violation of the username policy in my opinion, though they're both borderline. Blocking should not be our first response in such borderline cases. In both cases, the user talk page is a red link; no one has made any effort (as recommended by the UAA instructions) to first discuss with the user and suggest that they choose a more appropriate user name. This is something anyone can do; you don't have to be an admin. -- Diannaa (talk) 21:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well, unfortunately I'm not an admin, so you might want to ask that User: Diannaa who in both cases have applied her interpretation of WP:U in these cases. And I agree with you. Diannaa, your comments here are welcomed. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 21:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry. What I meant to say is reports of the user "Feet hands belly buttocks" and "DaielaHATESWIKI" have been declined. I don't get how they're not offensive. —George8211 / T 20:46, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Great article!
Your article is great!! I it has been a great article.--24.34.11.217 (talk) 23:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
09:29:26, 12 March 2015 review of submission by 148.88.161.0
- 148.88.161.0 (talk · contribs)
Hi Sam
Did you get a chance to take another look at the article below?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Wave_2_Growth_Hub_Program
This is the feedback I got off the last person who reviewed it: "It's less promotional now, but I think I would pay attention to the sources. Particularly in the latter half of the article, I think that there need to be additional citations for verification." I have since added more citations to the article. I am struggling to know what to change to make it publishable? Is there anything you can do to help?
Thanks
Nikki
148.88.161.0 (talk) 09:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Have a look at it now. Could citations in section /National Press/ be moved inline to support statements in the body? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
10:48:31, 12 March 2015 review of submission by 148.88.161.0
- 148.88.161.0 (talk · contribs)
Hi Sam, Thank you for your help with this! I have looked at the changes you have made and I think what I need for some of the citations to prove what the Hubs offer is to link to their individual web pages, for example www.c2cbusiness.org.uk. I notice you have taken off the list of the 15 Hubs that have come out of this programme. Is this because it linked back to the main website? Can I add it back in but link to all the separate page? Would that be ok? Then I can use these links for the citations as well. Thanks Nikki
148.88.161.0 (talk) 10:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, per WP:LINKFARM you should not stick in 15 URLs for each and every of the 15 city regions, not as inline URLs, not as external links, cf. the guidelines on External links. These are primary sources anyway. What you should do is to move the four secondary refs now in /National Press/ up somewhere in the text, and then zap that section. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 11:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
"Stormy Atmosphere" band page declined again
Dear Sam Sailor,
My article was declined again, this time by you, due to notability issues. Here is the link to it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Stormy_Atmosphere
The problem is that I feel like I am chasing my tail here, because I have already been through these issues with many other moderators.
I understand all the seriousness of the approach, but it feels like a de-ja-vu:
My article is declined, the reason is that the band seems not notable, then I prove it's notability with links to independent sources out of Israel, the first moderator says it seems ok to him, then I submit the article and it's being rejected by other moderator. Then again I manage to prove him that the band is notable and the sources are independent, resubmit the article and... poof - it's rejected by a third moderator!
Please help me with the issue once and for all. I don't beleive it's fair to make me work again and again on a same article, instead of writing other articles and contribute some more to Wikipedia.
The explanations I got from previous moderators mustt have lead me astray so far. Then please be more specific with your remarks, or I might repeat the same mistakes, my article will be rejected again by someone else and this lose-lose loop will go on...
It would be great if you could also send me an answer as a message to my Talk
Thanks a lot in advance,
Silverray123 (talk) 13:40, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sam Sailor
Have you had a chance to look at my article?
Thanks again
Silverray123 (talk) 16:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Silverray123: Yes, but not enough, forgive me. I'll dig into it within 2 hours. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 16:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Silverray123: I had a read of all sources, copy edited the draft, moved some external links inline, and added a couple of references. The challenge we are facing is, that some sources are WP:USERGENERATED, others are just the average promo, and I can't see how it adds up to meeting any of the criteria set in WP:BAND. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 17:53, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Sam Sailor: Thanks a lot. Two questions:
§. What do you mean by "citation needed"?
§. Do I resubmit the article, or should I make more corrections, if so - which corrections exactly?
Thanks in advance,
Silverray123 (talk) 12:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
{{Citation needed}}
(click on it) asks for a source to support a statement or fact. (Technically I should maybe have used{{Attribution needed}}
but that's not the biggest deal, the thing is to avoid WP:OR.) Maybe the metalist.co.il review supports it and we could move that ref up? You can resubmit and get an opinion from another editor, none of us are judges or playing G*d. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:31, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
re: Robert Awards
Hi Sam. Great work! I think that'll go hand-in-hand with the Guldbagge Awards I've been working on (I think I'm upto the 30th Guldbagge Awards). Turn those redlinks to blue! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:43, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Speaking of all things Danish, this article has just been drive-by tagged. Any help on sourcing him would be much appreciated. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Done, have to run out for a sec, catch you later, have a couple of questions regarding ... MOS of all things! -- Sam Sailor Talk! 14:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. Yes, any questions, just ask. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 14:03, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
No prob, gave me a chance to link to Morten Piil using the authorlink parameter. Following up: yes, I can tell you have as many red-linked subjects in the Guldbagga Awards as do I in the Roberts. Now, regarding MOS, do you use that side-by-side table in e.g. 30th Guldbagge Awards for the results because you think it's the best way to present it or because there is a tradition to do it that way? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 14:39, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- The tables are based on the layout for the Academy Awards, which seems to be the standard, although they have recently been updated to improve accessibility for visually impared users (see 87th Academy Awards, for example). Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 14:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Lugnuts: I know that layout is used in Academy Awards and likely from there in a bunch of award articles. Do you remember any centralised discussion about this choice of table? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 15:28, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know of any discussion off the top of my head, but I think this layout became the defacto one. It's used on the César Awards, so it's not just US-centric! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Lugnuts: I know that layout is used in Academy Awards and likely from there in a bunch of award articles. Do you remember any centralised discussion about this choice of table? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 15:28, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- The main benefit I see is that those pages also list all the nominated films/people too. I tend to work through those names when I was doing the Guldbagge Awards. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm on it captain, I'm on it, saw your link in 32nd Robert Awards, give an old deckhand a little time here.
In a more serious tone, the last 15-20 years for both the Roberts and the Bodils are likely easy to fill out with nominees, but it seems a lot harder with the older ceremonies, and neither Danish Film Critics Association nor Danish Film Academy have been very forthcoming with finding the info and none of the standard reference works (Rasmussen/Piil etc.) have complete lists including nominees. Regarding the two-column tables I still do not see their benefit over lists, but as I said somewhere else, if there's a consensus to do it with tables, that's how we do it. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm on it captain, I'm on it, saw your link in 32nd Robert Awards, give an old deckhand a little time here.
11:26:01, 12 March 2015 review of submission by 148.88.161.0
- 148.88.161.0 (talk · contribs)
Hello again! How is this? Do you think this is ok to be resubmitted?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Wave_2_Growth_Hub_Programme
Thank you!
148.88.161.0 (talk) 11:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 March 2015
- Special report: An advance look at the WMF's fundraising survey
- In the media: Gamergate; a Wiki hoax; Kanye West
- Traffic report: Wikipedia: handing knowledge to the world, one prank at a time
- Featured content: Here they come, the couple plighted –
- Op-ed: Why the Core Contest matters
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFOs Declassified
Hi Sam Sailor. I wish to challenge your closing of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFOs Declassified. It seems like your assessment of consensus was based on a vote count, rather than policy based arguments. In fact, all of the arguments for keeping the article were based on an essay, and one was based on a dismissal of WP:GNG. I am requesting the you reverse the closure, and either let an admin close it, or better yet, allow other editors to comment so that there is a clear consensus. Thank you.- MrX 01:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, you got that wrong, I based my closure on, apart from the arguments put forth, the fact that common outcome is "Television series broadcast nationally by a major network or produced by a major studio are usually kept as they are considered notable." But should you still insist, I will re-open with a comment about this, and let somebody else close it. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 01:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think circular logic and bypassing community consensus are good practices. Keep arguments are supposed to be based on evidence of non-trivial, independent coverage in reliable sources and encyclopedic value. If the program were a long-running series, I might think differently, but since many of these programs are cancelled after (or even during) their first season, ignoring rules and deferring to essays does not seem wise. I stand by my request to have the discussion re-opened and thank you. - MrX 01:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- I respect that we have different opinions, and will be happy to re-open the discussion. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 01:42, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think circular logic and bypassing community consensus are good practices. Keep arguments are supposed to be based on evidence of non-trivial, independent coverage in reliable sources and encyclopedic value. If the program were a long-running series, I might think differently, but since many of these programs are cancelled after (or even during) their first season, ignoring rules and deferring to essays does not seem wise. I stand by my request to have the discussion re-opened and thank you. - MrX 01:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Article Rejection of Rev. W. A. (Willis Anselm), Jarrel D.D. article?
Sam Sailer, Jarrel is a noted 19th century author and I did cite two good and verifible sources, and can add a third. You can go right to amazon.com and buy his books written more than a hundred years ago. He may not be important to most of us today, but he was a significant author back then, just being published was significant a hundred and fifty years ago, very expensive. This is important history.
I'm just asking what more are you looking for as a reference if not his own published books and a newpaper article I cited? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed Elam (talk • contribs) 14:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
De Molliere History
Hi Sam,
Hope this finds you well. I recently submitted a history on the De Molliere family, whom I have been conducting research into. I apologise for the inconvenience I caused by attempting to publish original research as I realise this is against policy. I've started to edit the page and was wondering if you could take a look at the page and let me know what you think of my revisions? I've replaced original material with only the content we can reference online (mainly from the site House of Names and a site I've hastily constructed). I realise you're extremely busy so I understand if it's a question of simply re-submitting the piece for review. Many thanks, H. 17:35, 13/04/2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mokshamoksha2222 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- It's still not supported by any reliable sources. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 20:16, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
23:14:34, 13 March 2015 review of submission by A De Lacy
Thank you for your feedback on this article.
I have attempted to alter the tone throughout, and shall continue to make amendments if necessary. Before I resubmit, I wanted to ask your advice with regard to the sources. While I appreciate that many of those used were published pre-internet and therefore are not easily verifiable, I believe independent newspapers and magazines to be acceptable sources regardless. If the tone is appropriate, will the article still be declined due to sources not being available online and could I somehow scan and upload sources for verification purposes?
Best regards,
Ava
A De Lacy (talk) 23:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Ava, some of the sources not being on-line is not a big problem, in fact sources are not required to be on-line, cf. WP:SOURCEACCESS. To me it's a bigger problem that the whole "article" sound much more like something I'd expect to read in an exhibition catalogue or on an art blog, not an encyclopedia. But the great thing about AfC is that you do not have to rely on the opinion on one editor (me), you could resubmit and get the opinions from other editors. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 20:32, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
sorry
I apoligize for my edit I thought i have this right, i am from different country so I might have messed up. I was using google translation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerd33373 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
04:25:08, 16 March 2015 review of submission by Andrew.muench
Hello, I am trying to create a page for the 436th Operations Support Squadron. I belong to the squadron, and my Commander asked me to create a wikipedia page so members would have something to show their loved ones about all the great work they're doing. It's been returned for a lack for verifiable sources, but I followed the same format and sources for the 9th airlift squadron, which is also at Dover. I guess I'm wondering why their page is up on Wikipedia while mine is being rejected. I've included the most accurate sources I could find up to this point. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Andrew.muench (talk) 04:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
![]() |
Hi Sam Sailor. Thanks for the welcome message. Always nice to meet a fellow Leonard Cohen fan! Thanks too for taking the time to review the Bugula neritina article. Much appreciated. tH0r (talk contribs) 13:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC) |
thank you Sam
Hi Sam- thank you so much for accepting my Edward Dugger page, my first wikipedia page. I guess now it needs to be 'de-orphaned' somehow. Also appreciated your edits and cleaning up the organization. Sorry if incorrect venue saying thx. Wasn't sure how to contact you. Thanks again! Jnewengland (talk) 03:22, 25 February 2015 (UTC)Jnewengland ps. Did I say thank you? ;-)
- @Jnewengland: Good to hear from you! I have actually been thinking a couple of times to drop by on your talk page and say thank you. And here is why: you can not imagine how much utter crap one has to read at Articles for Creation: musician wannabes, youtube vloggers, promotional company "articles" copied directly from their About page. But then, from time to time, there are decent submissions, and among them are the rare shining stars. Edward Dugger, to me, was one such. Not only did you do a good job, but his bio is interesting reading. So it is I, who thank you. In return I fixed the orphanage situation, have a look.
Best, -- Sam Sing! 03:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
BTW, I'm working on my first article, and I've been looking through Sam's Talk page trying to learn how to do things correctly. I went to Edward Dugger to see a good example. I concur, it's a nice editing job and I really enjoyed learning about him. User:RobSVA User talk:RobSVA — Preceding undated comment added 18:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Appreciate your feedback Sam + Rob! My hope is Edward Dugger will be a good example to others. He accomplished a great deal in his relatively brief life. (jnewengland) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnewengland (talk • contribs) 20:39, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
ps. It's a honor to read what you wrote Sam. I know you have high standards. Much appreciated! -jnewengland — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnewengland (talk • contribs) 20:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
translation
I just finished translating this page https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globe_de_cristal_(arts_et_culture) Not sure where to submit it or if I even need to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colinboisvert (talk • contribs) 16:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Providence(religious movement)
Please respond to the discussion on the Providence(religious movement) talk page so that a consensus can be reached regarding the addition or alteration of proposed edits. Thank you. GIOSCali (talk) 05:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Jayantilal_Gada
user name: Yatin Rewale article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jayantilal_Gada With the feedback that my references in article not correct. I removed refernces that not right or reliable as you mentioned .I added new reference for subject notability.Now any new references in article are reliable or not pls tell me .Please tell me what changes i have to do now to get this article accepted. thank you (Yatin Rewale (talk) 11:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yatin Rewale (talk • contribs) (Yatin Rewale (talk) 07:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)).
Eric Sollee
Hi Sam,
Regarding Draft:Eric Sollee This is my first article and first time writing to a talk page so please forgive mistakes (and tell me how to fix them).
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: I was a student of Eric Sollee.
I've read your comments and tried to fix them, specifically: 1) removed puffery/peacock terms, 2) added references. I have saved the changes but not resubmitted. Are these changes sufficient? If not, for each of the two main issues could you please point to particular words or sections. I'll be happy to adjust.
I'm user RobSVA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RobSVA#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Eric_Sollee_.28March_8.29 [[1]]
RobSVA (talk) 15:53, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- RobSVA, have a look at what I've done to the draft and let me know how I can help you further. We need a good WP:INTRO, right now the text moves focus away from Sollee to Harmemberg. I can't write it because I know nothing about fencing or Sollee. Your COI should not be a problem, but if you again you find yourself writing "maestro" or "Blah-blah Hall of Famer" you ought to immediately go and take a cold shower
and return here reading WP:NPOV. Best, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 16:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Sam,
- I like the suggestions that you've made at the draft article. I made a bunch of changes; I believe that it's ready for your review.
- "Regarding "Maestro" and "Hall of Famer", I understand your point about how it looks. I've removed the text (except for where Eric was inducted into the Harvard Athletic Hall of fame, which is part of listing his achievements).
- You might want to reconsider however: "Maestro is used in the sport of fencing, for a fencing instructor, and may be used in other sports to convey respect for an individual's skill."[1] It is a title afforded to some coaches, please see for example: Giorgio Santelli and László Szabó (fencer). I had emphasized "Maestro" and the other credentials of his coaches a) to justify why Eric is notable and hence should be in Wikipedia and b) because this is part of Eric's pedigree. As a fencer, it's not just the name of the school or club at which you fenced, but it's the specific coach under whom you trained.
- Also, "USFA Hall of Famer" refers specifically to people who have been inducted into the United States Fencing Association (USFA) Hall of Fame. USFA is the governing body for fencing in the United States, e.g. they select the US Olympic fencing team. I added the credentials of his students, including the ones who have been inducted into the USFA Hall of Fame: a) again, to justify Eric being Notable and b) you're known and judged by the quality of the students that you have produced.
- If you believe that "Maestro" and "USFA Hall of Famer" are okay in this context, I'll judiciously re-instate them.
- thanks, I really appreciate the help.
- rob
- User:RobSVAUserTalk:RobSVA
- I believe that it's ready for your review.
- RobSVA (talk) 18:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Rob, you're not expected to know, but just for the future give WP:REDACT a read. No big deal here, but in other cases it can be. I think the draft looks good, the WP:LEAD sounds much better. Once you resubmit I'll stand back and let another editor at AfC chime in. Shouldn't you join Wikipedia:WikiProject Fencing? Have fun editing! -- Sam Sailor Talk! 18:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- RobSVA (talk) 18:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Many thanks! Your comments have been making me think and have resulted in a much better product. RobSVA (talk) 19:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- You're always welcome. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 19:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- It's been accepted! There's a banner at the top of the page that the citations are inconsistent. Does that mean that we are using different formatting of citations? Thanks again for all of your help! RobSVA (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Request on 17:57:32, 19 March 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mtsumal3g
Hi Sam,
This message is in regards to the Pat Waters article I submitted. I was hoping you could maybe help me in getting the article posted and approved. I am curious as to why the article was declined, and if you could help me change the submitted article to get it approved. Two questions I have with posting the article are formatting and content, thank you.
Mtsumal3g (talk) 17:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Request on 17:59:15, 19 March 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mtsumal3g
Hi Sam,
This message is in regards to the Pat Waters article I submitted. I was hoping you could maybe help me in getting the article posted and approved. I am curious as to why the article was declined, and if you could help me change the submitted article to get it approved. Two questions I have with posting the article are formatting and content, thank you. Mtsumal3g (talk) 17:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC) Mtsumal3g (talk) 17:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC) Mtsumal3g (talk) 17:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Acharya S
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Acharya S. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
11:10:18, 20 March 2015 review of submission by Hydramix
Hi Sam, I was wondering if you could re-reivew the article I posted, I had written it in the style of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Harvard_University-- I personally feel that information is too dense to appear on the University's main page but may be interesting to some individuals.
If you disagree, what would need to be done to make this a page that is noteworthy in and of itself? Have a great day!
Thanks, Hydramix (talk) 11:10, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Hydramix (talk) 11:10, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 March 2015
- From the editor: A salute to Pine
- Featured content: A woman who loved kings
- Traffic report: It's not cricket
.
00:09:32, 22 March 2015 review of submission by 94.132.40.100
94.132.40.100 (talk) 00:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
http://www.thedumbingofamerica.net/2013/05/17/thekoolaidelectriccompany/
About : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Koolaid_Electric_Company
I trully don't understand why you rejected the page about "The Koolaid Electric Company" band.. lamentable!
Jorge de Juan
Hi Sam,
I hope you are well.
I've only just seen that you have rejected the article on Jorge de Juan for insufficient references. I am not sure what is missing. Quite a few are from El Pais, which is a huge national paper in Spain, as are other publications listed, and the IMDB.
Please advise.
Best wishes,
Andy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy4102 (talk • contribs) 12:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Collapsed extended content
|
---|
The following is a closed discussion. Please do not modify it. |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC) |
The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation adopts open-access research policy
- Featured content: A carnival of animals, a river of dung, a wasteland of uncles, and some people with attitude
- Special report: Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year 2014
- Traffic report: Oddly familiar
- Recent research: Most important people; respiratory reliability; academic attitudes
Ragazine.CC
Sam, Thank you for pointing out the need for "Notability" in my submission of Ragazine.CC to Wikipedia. Ragazine.CC is an independent 501c3 not-for-profit operating under the aegis of Binghamton Imaginink, sponsor of the Binghamton, NY-based science and technology "Invention Convention." Founded in 2004, the zine has grown to an international circulation of around 10,000 visitors a month. (Not a lot in the scheme of things, but the audience is generally well-educated and the topics are eclectic in nature.) The zine review of ART KANE is referenced in Amazon's reviews of the book: Editorial Reviews Review Kane's portraits of rockers from Dylan to Joplin have an artistic panache that links them with his bold fashion imagery: the look of an illustrator with a camera. (American Photo Magazine's Top 10 Photo Books of 2014) (American Photo Magazine, December 1, 2014) Full of stunning images of the Stones and Cream alongside figures like Lenny Bruce, from a photographer who lived for the perfect shot. (Rolling Stone, January 16, 2015) Art Kane's creative legacy gets deserved attention with the publication of the new book Art Kane. This one is a must for anyone interested in photo history. (January 22, 2015) This book is the definitive statement of Art Kane. (Mike Foldes, Ragazine February 2015)
Important interviews appearing in Ragazine and remaining online include: W. D. Snodgrass (Pulitzer-award winning poet), Dorothea Rockburne, Albert Watson, Stephen Verona (Lords of Flatbush), Michael Eastman, Jonathan Kane and Holly Anderson, among others; stories, poems and articles by Jack Dann (sci-fi writer), Joe Weil, John Smelcer (author), Thad Rutkowski, Stephen Poleskie, Fred Roberts, Helene Gaillet, George Preston, et al. The nature of Ragazine is not necessarily to have the largest circulation, but to publish material with inherent relevance to 21st Century human activity and imagination.
Please advise how best to proceed. Thank you, Arthur N. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArthurNX (talk • contribs) 12:44, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The mystery of Demp Road
About two weeks ago, you prodded an article, Demproad Market, Hindaun City. The user who has repeatedly created this article under different names has, among other things, been accused of creating a hoax and been brought to ANI. I felt it might be important to determine whether this market or bazaar exists, and it turns out that Google Maps has a place mark for "Demp Road" in Hindaun, but it's marked at a crossroads without either of the two crossing roads being labeled with any name at all, as far as showed up for me. For now, I'm going with the hypothesis that the name of the road, if it exists, is probably Demp Road. If you have any further info, please let me know. Thanks, Samsara 15:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
23:57:29, 29 March 2015 review of submission by NarragansettJ
I am amazed that you would think that a description of the first major Washington office held by Senator Ted Cruz, Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, and others would fail to be sufficiently notable.
Perhaps I haven't formatted everything correctly, but seriously--Ted Cruz's first political office is not notable? I've added a recent profile of Cruz's time at the FTC that was published in National Review--BECAUSE IT IS NOTABLE!!
There are other alumni of OPP who can contribute to this thing once it get posted and maybe someone can fix the formatting. But I really find it hard to believe that no one would find it useful to learn more about the first position held by Ted Cruz (among others).
NarragansettJ (talk) 23:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
NarragansettJ (talk) 23:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Todd Zywicki
Please comment on Talk:Shaygan Kheradpir
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shaygan Kheradpir. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost, 1 April 2015
- In the media: Wiki-PR duo bulldoze a piñata store; Wifione arbitration case; French parliamentary plagiarism
- Featured content: Stop Press. Marie Celeste Mystery Solved. Crew Found Hiding In Wardrobe.
- Traffic report: All over the place
- Special report: Pictures of the Year 2015
Celebrate
![]() |
Yoor Know Phool |
Have a humorous day filled with lots of PHUN on this April Fools Day 2015. Any annoyance is purely coincidental. Bfpage |leave a message 10:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC) |
April 2015 Wikification drive.
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the April drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 03:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 April 2015
- In the media: Wiki-PR duo bulldoze a piñata store; Wifione arbitration case; French parliamentary plagiarism
- Featured content: Stop Press. Marie Celeste Mystery Solved. Crew Found Hiding In Wardrobe.
- Traffic report: All over the place
- Special report: Pictures of the Year 2015
The Signpost: 01 April 2015
- In the media: Wiki-PR duo bulldoze a piñata store; Wifione arbitration case; French parliamentary plagiarism
- Featured content: Stop Press. Marie Celeste Mystery Solved. Crew Found Hiding In Wardrobe.
- Traffic report: All over the place
- Special report: Pictures of the Year 2015
Happy Easter!
08:59:46, 8 April 2015 review of submission by Parlatommy
- Parlatommy (talk · contribs)
Hello Sam, thanks for reviewing my article. I noticed how the issues is with the sources and I would like to understand what I did wrong. Should I have included more sources? or the sources I used were not good? Should I find references only from newspapers or European Parliament produced documents and articles are sufficient?
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thanks for your help, Tommaso Parlatommy (talk) 08:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Franklin D. Roosevelt
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Franklin D. Roosevelt. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 April 2015
- Traffic report: Resurrection week
- Featured content: Partisan arrangements, dodgy dollars, a mysterious union of strings, and a hole that became a monument
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Arbitration report: New Functionary appointments
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hi Sam,
You rejected my article on skin to skin contact based on my incomplete citations. It's taken me sometime but I've finally completed them. Please can you check out the page and approve it :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Skin-to-skin_contact
Thanks Cameron — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cameron Cunningham (talk • contribs) 13:04, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 April 2015
- Traffic report: Furious domination
18:55:16, 19 April 2015 review of submission by Daleoncavallo
Sam Sailor, I have made several changes to my Kevin K-Rob Robinson page and I am hoping you can review. If satisfactory please approve. Don't know if the Sam Sailor part of your name denotes US Navy. I am active US Navy stationed at NIOC GA. Thanks for your time, V/R Doug Daleoncavallo (talk) 18:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Daleoncavallo (talk) 18:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sam Sailor,
I'm writing about Operosa
Unfortunately our page was declined again, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Operosa The confusing thing is that is a user who no longer exists. Would you please take a look? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aerospeed
I really don't know what to do next.
Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Operosa (talk • contribs) 08:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Bitmarkets
Thanks for your help with editing. Do you feel the Bitmarkets page ready to be made public now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevedekorte (talk • contribs) 20:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Made an error creating a new page
Hi Sam, I just created a new page, but did something stupid when I tried to finalise it. The header should be Nicky Harman. But somehow I turned it into User Edit: Nicky Harman. Please could you check it and if it's OK, give it the proper header? Thanks. Hkb (talk) 12:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Collapsed extended content
|
---|
The following is a closed discussion. Please do not modify it. |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 22 April 2015
- In the media: UK political editing; hoaxes; net neutrality
- Featured content: Vanguard on guard
- Traffic report: A harvest of couch potatoes
- Gallery: The bitter end
Frank Matheis page
Hi Sam,
I'm trying to get a page on Frank Matheis published. I've tried a couple of times to do the proper thing, but each time there is a new caveat. Frank is a prolific folk/blues journalist and radio commentator who also has made radio documentaries on a number of subjects. Like many journalists, he does a lot of writing, but people don't write about him that often. Therefore, the amount of reference material is limited. However, he has written scores of album reviews in the niche of country blues. Below is the entire document of material either about Frank or what he's written. I feel this is material of interest to the Wikipedia community. I would like to post it, but am asking for your guidance first.
Thanks.
References
Articles referencing Frank Matheis
Bio: http://www.thecountryblues.com/about-frank-matheis/
Oliver Schwambach – Saarbrücker Zeitung Endstation Amerika, 24 Dec. 2009. Germany. http://www.yasni.info/ext.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.saarbruecker-zeitung.de%2Fnachrichten%2Fkultur%2FEndstation-Amerika%3Bart2822%2C3142463&name=Frank+Matheis&showads=1&lc=en-us&lg=en&rg=de&rip=us
Silberman, Alex – Hudson Valley Magazine Oct. 1999 – Boomer Box – Finally Radio for Grown Ups w. quote about Frank Matheis on pg. 21
Dr. Gussow, Adam – Course outline Univ. of Mississippi. ENGL 324: The Blues Tradition in American Literature (Fall 2012) Frank Matheis,“Guy Davis Has It All—Or Does He?” http://www.modernbluesharmonica.com/f/ENGL_324.f12.courspak-contents.pdf
Goldsmith, Kate – Taconic Weekend Arts & Entertainment Weekly– Frank Matheis gives the blues its due on WKZE FM – April 13, 2000 cover story.
Staff writer – Deutschlandradio Program announcements – Lange Nacht program – Frank Matheis two programs: Von Quebec bis Hawaii – Eine Lange Nacht in der Nord Amerikanische Folk Musik 2001 and I Wish I Was In Heaven Sitting Down – a six hour long radio documentary about the Mississippi Delta Blues. Written, produced and narrated by Frank Matheis and aired in German. April 7, 2001 http://www.dradio.de/dlf/sendungen/langenacht_alt/010407.html
Berrett, Josh – Music and Happiness - A great Passion for Music – Dec. 18, 2014 http://musicandhappiness.com
Dr. Van Buren, Tom – ArtsWestchester White Plains, New York, Spring Spring 2013 Season Program “…Acoustic Blues promoter and scholar Frank Matheis…” https://artswestchester.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Live_ArtsW_Brochure_MARCH-SEASON.pdf
Staff Writer – Westchester Magazine May 2013 - Artswestchester Presents An Evening Of Piedmont Blues With Phil Wiggins ...Presented in association with Frank Matheis with support from New York State Council on the Arts. http://www.westchestermagazine.com/Westchester-Magazine/Calendar/index.php/name/ArtsWestchester-presents-An-Evening-of-Piedmont-Blues-with-Phil-Wiggins/event/32627/
Toby Walker – Artist website – Toby Walker, Phil Wiggins and Piedmont Bluz-...Sometime in the early part of 2013 my friend Frank Matheis of The Country Blues.com had the idea of putting together a concert with myself and the legendary harmonica player Phil Wiggins.
Radio website – WKZE FM – Dec. 2003– The People of WKZE 98.1 FM “Musicologist, musician and internationally published music writer FRANK MATHEIS presents the highly acclaimed roots, blues and eclectic music program entitled "FRANK'S PICKS" every Friday evening from 7 to 10 as well as "THE BLUES SHOW" heard on Saturday nights. His blues credentials include many years of playing the blues harmonica, producing an award winning, internationally broadcast blues documentary, plus writing for leading blues magazines, including Blues Access and Blues & Rhythm in the UK. https://web.archive.org/web/20050306231914/http://www.wkze.com/people.shtml
Tilly Strauss – Showing up for the Muse- Nov. 20, 2008 Dutchess Magazine …The article is written by Frank Matheis and the photos are by Bibiana Matheis... http://tillystudio.blogspot.com/2008/11/dutchess-magazine.html
Discussion Forum – Big Road Blues Aug. 30, 2009 Six hour blues radio documentary primer Podcast now open. http://bigroadblues.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=10264
Amberly Timperio – The Pawling News Chronicle pg. 1 cover , Feb. 15, 2001- Pawling’s Matheis wins radio award for blues documentary
Staff Writer – Taconic Newspapers – pg.A6 – Dec. 3, 1998 – Matheis to produce radio blues documentary.
Staff Writer – Hudson Valley Music website –Winter 2009 – Hope Machine … “Anna Canoni was looking for a couple of singers to help celebrate her grandfather Woody Guthrie's birthday. She had organized a "hootenanny" at a Westchester record store and asked her friend radio host Frank Matheis to refer her to some people who could do a good job of singing some Woody Guthrie songs. Frank invited Fred Gillen Jr. and Todd Giudice, two local singer/ songwriters who had performed on his radio show.” http://www.hvmusic.com/listing/bands_detail.php?listing_id=1374
Edited by Lisa Gail Collins and Margo Natalie Crawford - New Thoughts on the Black Arts Movement- If Bessie Smith had Killed Some White People by Dr. Adam Gussow- Rutgers University Press, May 16, 2006 pg 228 reference to Frank Matheis’ article Guy Davis: Favored Son in Blues Access magazine.
Testimonials about Frank Matheis’ projects
“People often ask me, ‘To what do you attribute the resurgence of the
Blues?’ Usually I reply, 'I didn't know it went anywhere.' Well it is thanks to people like Frank Matheis that it is always available. For the new listener, this will turn you on to the many colored art form that the blues really are. For the long time fan, you will hear things you heard years ago as well as things you should have heard years ago. You will also hear things you should hear today. Don't miss ‘I Wish I Was In Heaven Sitting Down’.” Jorma Kaukonen Singer/Songwriter Hot Tuna; The Jefferson Airplane
“…This [documentary] is much more in depth than I imagined. You get a lot of information in here but plenty of music too… Overall it’s impressive in that it’s both scholarly and entertaining…” Bruce Iglauer President Alligator Records
‘I Wish I Was in Heaven Sitting Down’ …should be required listening for anyone interested in American music…because it brims with powerful, potentially life-changing blues. You cannot hear this music and remain unmoved.” Eric Pooley, Editor - TIME magazine, personal quote
“Congratulations on ‘I Wish I Was in Heaven Sitting Down’. It is a brilliant, encylopedic and thoroughly enjoyable documentary of the blues… a truly epic achievement of song and sensitive commentary.”
Raymond R. Patterson (deceased)
Poet and Author of Elemental Blues
former Professor of English
City University of New York
“What a great time I had listening to the 6 hours of blues documentary. I learned so much about the blues and about different performers, some of whose names I knew, and others it was great to learn about and hear. It was a great education for me and so entertaining as well I hope that many other people will have the opportunity to hear ‘I Wish I Was In Heaven Sitting Down’.”
Sonny Ochs
Host of “Mostly Folk”
Producer – Phil Ochs Song Nights
WRPI, New York
"Frank Matheis' radio documentary series, 'I Wish I Was in Heaven Sitting Down,' is distinguished both by the range of blues-topics covered in each episode and by the freshness of musical (and poetic) selections Matheis has chosen to include. He's assembled an all-star cast, including actor James Earl Jones and folklorist David Evans. The blend of anecdotal and historical material works wonderfully to evoke the sorrows, hardships, redemptive humor, and creative artistry of the blues people Matheis profiles. 'The blues,' Matheis notes eloquently, 'can be about crying and dying, about hopes and dreams and everything in between.' Beautifully put--like so much else in this fascinating and informative series." Dr. Adam Gussow Blues Scholar and Harmonica Player (Satan & Adam) Author of Mister Satan’s Apprentice Prof. at the University of Mississippi
“… Reflecting Mr. Matheis' deep appreciation for the soulful wellspring from which the best of this music surges -- as well as for the contagiously emotive form itself -- this program intersperses a mix of probing, thoughtful commentary and evocative anecdotes with excellent music selections, including a number of surprises…There is enough cogent explanation of sources, social context, technique and evolution here to guide the uninitiated while enriching the experience for blues cognoscenti as well. Equally gratifying, with strong production values, the program delivers this powerful music with a vibrant presence throughout.” Procter Lippincott Former music editor at Scholastic Magazines , and music writer for Down Beat, The Village Voice and Newsday, among others
"This is a professionally produced series worthy of any blues loving radio station putting to air. Insightful commentary and spot on historical track selection guides the listener through the history of Mississippi Delta Blues from its origins in Africa to the present day…. I’d just like to thank you for giving me the opportunity to air this wonderful program." Geoff Pegler Host of BluesBeat , FM 89.3 Victor Harbor, 94.7 Strathalbyn, 88.3 Yankalilla S.A. Host of "The Sound of the Fleurieu" FM 106.7 Mildura, 90.7 Robinvale & Wentworth Vic, 87.8 Coomealla Nsw. Australia
“…I have found your website and podcasts to be a fantastic resource, and just plain fun (for a blues lover like me!).”
Prof. Dr. Steve Garabedian Dept. of History Marist College Author of: Reds, Whites, and the Blues: Lawrence Gellert, “Negro Songs of Protest,” and the Leftwing Folksong Revival of the 1930s and 1940s
“This site is the greatest! At last, something that points true fans of country blues to the quality of music that’s out there. I could spend hours, days even, checking it all out. “
Dr. David Evans Prof. of Ethnomusicology University of Memphis Musicologist, musician, author of Big Road Blues
“TheCountryBlues.com website that Frank Matheis has so diligently and meticulously created is my main “go-to” source whenever I need information on the contemporary country blues scene. Teaching several university courses in the blues means that I’m always being asked by my students what’s a good source of info on modern acoustic blues. Without hesitation I shoot them off to Frank’s site. It (and he) are a font of inestimable information presented with the care of someone who truly loves (and knows) the country blues! There’s no other site like it on the internet!”
Dr. Bruce Conforth, musician, musicologist, author. Prof. of American Culture – University of Michigan
Publications by Frank Matheis
Magazine articles Matheis, Frank - Living Blues magazine Issue #234 Vol. 45 # 6 Dec 2014 cover story pg 8. Phil Wiggins – On His Own But Not Alone.
Matheis, Frank – Living Blues magazine Issue #234 Vol. 45 # 6 Dec 2014 pg 34. Slam Allen – The Soul Working Man.
Matheis, Frank – Living Blues magazine Issue #223 Vol. 44 # 1 Feb 2013 pg 6. Ben Harper with Charlie Musselwhite – a new way of being traditional
Matheis, Frank - Living Blues magazine Issue #223 Vol. 44 # 1 Feb 2013 pg 43. Habib Koité and Eric Bibb
Matheis, Frank - Living Blues magazine Issue #227 Vol. 44 # 5 Oct 2013 pg 68. Shoebox Full of Blues
Matheis, Frank – Blues Access magazine Issue 45 Spring 2001 pg. 16 Guy Davis has it all – Or does he?
Matheis, Frank – Dutchess Magazine Jan./Feb. 2008 pg. 14 cover story – Tuned In- WHVW keeps music alive on the AM Dial
Matheis, Frank – Dutchess Magazine Aug. /Sept. 1998 pg. 24 – Sing With a Grin – an interview with Pete Seeger
Matheis, Frank – Dutchess Magazine July/Aug. 2006. pg. 12 Cover story – Chairman of the Board – Paul Orofino & Millbrook Sound Studio celebrate 20 years
Matheis, Frank – Folker magazine Germany Nr. 6-99 – Nov./Dec. 1999 Now You Can Talk About Me Too - Doug MacLeod
Matheis, Frank – Folker magazine Germany Nr. 1/2002 John Kay
Matheis, Frank – Music Matters magazine – Vol. 3 -1996 – pg. 4 Catie Curtis interview
Matheis, Frank – Dutchess Magazine Nov./Dec. 2008 pg. 38 Pictures of home – Elizabeth ‘Tilly” Strauss ‘canvases’ the county
Matheis, Frank – Sing Out! Magazine Vol. 46 No.4 Winter 2003 pg. 82 – The Spirited Musical Amalgam of Csokolom
Matheis, Frank – Sing Out! Magazine Vol. 45 No.4 Winter 2002 pg. 86 – Hey Rube Column: Busk or Bust! Hitting the Streets of Europe
Matheis, Frank – InsideOut Magazine July/August 2008 pg 26 – What to Wear to a Jazz Club ( and what not to wear to Paris).
Columns
Matheis, Frank – The Pawling Press Jan. 2010 – Jun 2012 – weekly columnist Taking the Liberty. Published 120 Op/Ed articles
Matheis, Frank –Weekend in eight Hudson Valley, New York newspapers published weekly by Taconic Press – weekly CD review column Frank’s Picks. Oct. 1995 to Oct. 2001. Published 312 articles.
Matheis, Frank – Regular columnist as CD reviewer Living Blues magazine since 2013. Write an average of three reviews per issue.
Matheis, Frank – Regular columnist as CD reviewer Blues Access magazine. Wrote an average of three reviews per issue 2000-2001.
Web Publishing
Matheis, Frank – thecountryblues.com publisher and editor, primary writer; wrote and published more than 110 articles since 2011.
Matheis, Frank thecountryblues.com 2006 In Defense of Robert Johnson- An ever so mild critique of Elijah Wald’s “Escaping the Delta” http://www.thecountryblues.com/op-ed/in-defense-of-robert-johnson/
Radio Documentaries Matheis, Frank – I Wish I Was In Heaven Sitting Down – a six hour long radio documentary about the Mississippi Delta Blues. Written, produced and narrated by Frank Matheis and aired in German and English. This program has aired on: • WKZE- FM, 98.1 – January 1999, replayed in January 2001 • KCCK-FM, Cedar Rapids, Iowa- October 1999 • Martin “Lester” Dunstan- “Lester” presents “JuzBlooz” 3WAY FM 100.9 MHz, Warrnambool, Australia – May 30 to July 4, 2000 • Geoff Pegler’s BluesBeat- FM 89.3 Victor Harbor, 94.7 Strathalbyn, 88.3 Yankalilla S.A.; and “The Sound of the Fleurieu” FM 106.7 Mildura, 90.7 Robinvale & Wentworth Vic, 87.8 Coomealla Nsw. Australia – April 22- May 27, 2000 • Aired on German Public Radio (Deutschlandradio/Deutschlandfunk Redaktion Lange Nacht 1999 (German language version) Podcast: http://www.thecountryblues.com/podcasts/ Matheis, Frank – Von Quebec bis Hawaii – Eine Lange Nacht in der Nord Amerikanischenc Folk Musik 2001. A three hour German language radio documentary about North American Folk Music. Aired on German Public Radio (Deutschlandradio/Deutschlandfunk Redaktion Lange Nacht 2001 http://www.dradio.de/dlf/sendungen/langenacht_alt/010407.html http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/von-quebec-bis-hawaii.704.de.html?dram:article_id=85550
Matheis, Frank – Hey, Where is Django Playing –Django Reinhardt and his Legacy
a 3 hour long radio documentary written, produced and narrated by Frank Matheis. 2003
Podcast : http://www.djangodocumentary.com
Aired on WKZE FM.
Matheis, Frank –Eine Lange Nacht Ganz Weit Weg von Daheim 2001. A three hour autobiographical German language radio documentary about a teenager emigrating from Germany to the United States. Aired on German Public Radio (Deutschlandradio/Deutschlandfunk Redaktion Lange Nacht 2009 http://www.deutschlandradiokultur.de/ganz-weit-weg-von-daheim.1024.de.html?dram:article_id=174250
Short Stories
Matheis, Frank – The Country and Abroad – Nov. 2007 – pg. 59 Robert Johnson with a Cigarette (short story)
Matheis, Frank – The Country and Abroad – Aug./Sept. 2009 – pg. 81 Knocked Out (short story)
Matheis, Frank – The Country and Abroad –2001 [issue reference needed]– pg. [reference needed] To Fill a Spinning Sky (short story)
Book project Wiggins, Phil and Matheis, Frank – Sweet Bitter Blues – The East Coast Blues Scene in Washington, D.C. 1975-2015. A book project in progress. 2015 http://www.sweetbitterblues.com
MichaelOpton (talk) 18:42, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
You declined this article as not meeting WP:PROF--apparently not noticing he had held two named chairs at two different research universities, and this meets the standard. (He also meets WP:AUTHOR). The article did need rewriting, which I'm doing . DGG ( talk ) 20:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Dint Remove the Wearily Content
Sorry I Dint Remove The Wearily Content — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.233.181.143 (talk) 15:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 April 2015
- Featured content: Another day, another dollar
- Traffic report: Bruce, Nessie, and genocide
- Recent research: Military history, cricket, and Australia targeted in Wikipedia articles' popularity vs. quality; how copyright damages economy
- Technology report: VisualEditor and MediaWiki updates
17:48:00, 4 May 2015 review of submission by Surfsupjoe125
Surfsupjoe125 (talk) 17:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Surfsupjoe125 (talk) 17:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Hello Sam Sailor I have edited the Jesse Cutler entry and will be submitting again. I hope I have followed your suggestions and it is determined to be more noteworthy as per your comment.
The Signpost: 06 May 2015
- News and notes: "Inspire" grant-making campaign concludes, grantees announced
- Featured content: The amorous android and the horsebreeder; WikiCup round two concludes
- Special report: FDC candidates respond to key issues
- Traffic report: The grim ship reality
The Signpost: 13 May 2015
- Foundation elections: Board candidates share their views with the Signpost
- Traffic report: Round Two
- In the media: Grant Shapps story continues
- Featured content: Four first-time featured article writers lead the way
The Signpost: 20 May 2015
- From the editor: Your voice is needed: strategic voting in the WMF election
- Traffic report: Inner Core
- News and notes: A dark side of comedy: the Wikipedia volunteers cleaning up behind John Oliver's fowl jokes
- Featured content: Puppets, fungi, and waterfalls
- In the media: Jimmy Wales accepts Dan David Prize
- WikiProject report: Cell-ebrating Molecular Biology
- Arbitration report: Editor conduct the subject of multiple cases
Gregory G. Curtin, Ph.D., JD - article declined for not being written in encyclopedic style, using peacock terms
Dear Sam, edited the article Gregory G. Curtin, Ph.D., JD per your direction. strapped it of peacock terms. added more references. Please review when you get a chance and let me know if the updated version reads "neutral" Many thanks for your guidance. GK at CRG 4-30-2015 GK at CRG (talk) 03:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 May 2015
- News and notes: WMF releases quarterly reports, annual plans
- Discussion report: A relic from the past that needs to be updated
- Featured content: When music was confined to a ribbon of rust
- Recent research: Drug articles accurate and largely complete; women "slightly overrepresented"; talking like an admin
- Traffic report: Summer, summer, summertime
- Technology report: MediaWiki blows up printers
June 2015 Wikification drive.
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the June drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 04:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 June 2015
- News and notes: Three new community-elected trustees announced, incumbents out
- Discussion report: The deprecation of Persondata; RfA – A broken process; Complaints from users on Swedish Wikipedia
- Featured content: It's not over till the fat man sings
- Technology report: Things are getting SPDYier
- Special report: Towards "Health Information for All": Medical content on Wikipedia received 6.5 billion page views in 2013
- Traffic report: A rather ordinary week
Article related to Luminoso
Hi Sam,
You were good enough to review the article I submitted about Luminoso a couple months back. I submitted a related article about three weeks ago to WP:AFC. It's about the CEO, who is a very prominent artificial intelligence researcher out of MIT. I think it's even more interesting than the Luminoso article. Her team at MIT led the creation of a program that's been independently tested at the verbal level of a 4-year old and has likely improved a lot since the last test.
I thought you might want to look at it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Catherine_Havasi I again disclosed a WP:COI on the Talk page, as I did with Luminoso. Perhaps since you already reviewed Luminoso, it will be faster for you to get up to speed with the article on Catherine Havasi. I probably should have alerted you when I first submitted it for review.
Many thanks,
Edsussman (talk) 02:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC)EdSussman
The Signpost: 10 June 2015
- News and notes: Chapter financial trends analyzed, news in brief
- Traffic report: Two households, both alike in dignity
- Featured content: Just the bear facts, ma'am
- Technology report: Wikimedia sites are going HTTPS only
The Signpost: 17 June 2015
- Arbitration report: An election has consequences
- News and notes: Labs outage kills tools, self; news in brief
- Featured content: Great Dane hits 150
- Discussion report: A quick way of becoming an admin
- WikiProject report: Western Australia speaks – we are back
The Signpost: 24 June 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost tagging initiative
- Featured content: One eye when begun, two when it's done
- Technology report: 2015 MediaWiki architecture focus and Multimedia roadmap announced
- News and notes: Board of Trustees propose bylaw amendments
- Arbitration report: Politics by other means: The American politics 2 arbitration
Please comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Collapsed extended content
|
---|
The following is a closed discussion. Please do not modify it. |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:12, 29 June 2015 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 01 July 2015
- News and notes: Training the Trainers; VP of Engineering leaves WMF
- In the media: EU freedom of panorama; Nehru outrage; BBC apology
- WikiProject report: Able to make a stand
- Featured content: Viva V.E.R.D.I.
- Traffic report: We're Baaaaack
- Technology report: Technical updates and improvements
Please comment on Talk:Thomas Piketty
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Thomas Piketty. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 July 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation annual plan released, news in brief
- In the media: Wikimania warning; Wikipedia "mystery" easily solved
- Traffic report: The Empire lobs back
- Featured content: Pyrénées, Playmates, parliament and a prison...
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Thanks !
A huge thanks for Your improvement on Janni Spies. If You could do the same about Simon Spies it would be even better. I'm not perticulary intrested in Janni Spies, but when I noticed Janni Spies in red, I just though I could do something. The story about Simon Spies, including the scandals during his "hippie-epoqe" also needs a good update and expanding. But thanks anyway ! Boeing720 (talk) 22:49, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Boeing720: You are welcome. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:39, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
José Cordero
Hi Sam, long time to see. Again this guy persists his selfpromotion in es.wikipedia as 190.36.165.58, and now in Commons, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alex rodriguez.jpeg. --Taichi (talk) 00:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hola Taichi, está todo bien? Yes, he is annoying in his persistence, but I believe we'll keep catching him if we run searches like those below once in a while. I have updated the LTA file on Dutch Wikipedia. Best, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 11:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Also "José Corderos" or "Josecorderos" (now he added a "s"). --Taichi (talk) 17:59, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oh boy, yeah, I see es:José Corderos. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:07, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Also "José Corderos" or "Josecorderos" (now he added a "s"). --Taichi (talk) 17:59, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Carolyn Ellis page help
Hello. You reviewed and helped me with creating a Wikipedia page for academic Arthur Bochner. I am now trying to create a page about the academic Carolyn Ellis. I am struggling with how to footnote the same source several times without repeating the source in the references. I also forget the process by which I need to go through to have the page reviewed and published. I am attaching the link here. I would be grateful for your help. Thank you!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolyn_Ellis — Preceding unsigned comment added by DRnlhodges (talk • contribs) 07:24, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 July 2015
- Op-ed: On paid editing and advocacy: when the Bright Line fails to shine, and what we can do about it
- Traffic report: Belles of the ball
- WikiProject report: What happens when a country is no longer a country?
- News and notes: The Wikimedia Conference and Wikimania
- Featured content: When angels and daemons interrupt the vicious and intemperate
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Please comment on Talk:Gog and Magog
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gog and Magog. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
RfC: On Software Notability.
There is currently a RfC on the topic of software notability (whether consensus has changed or if the essay needs updating) at Wikipedia talk:Notability (software)#RfC: On Software Notability.. As you previously referenced the essay, I thought you might be interested. :) ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 July 2015
- From the editor: Change the world
- News and notes: Wikimanía 2016; Lightbreather ArbCom case
- Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015 report, part 1, the plenaries
- Traffic report: The Nerds, They Are A-Changin'
- WikiProject report: Some more politics
- Featured content: The sleep of reason produces monsters
- Gallery: "One small step..."
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Collapsed extended content
|
---|
The following is a closed discussion. Please do not modify it. |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC) |
Please comment on Talk:Jeb Bush
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeb Bush. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 July 2015
- News and notes: BARC de-adminship proposal; Wikimania recordings debate
- Recent research: Wikipedia and collective intelligence; how Wikipedia is tweeted
- In the media: Is Wikipedia a battleground in the culture wars?
- Featured content: Even mammoths get the Blues
- Traffic report: Namaste again, Reddit