User talk:SandeepKumarMeena

Welcome!

Hello, SandeepKumarMeena, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Check out WT:IN for India-related discussions.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! utcursch | talk 16:17, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page अटरू to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Hitro talk 12:24, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creating non-English articles

Hello there, I believe you want to create a Hindi language article. Articles written in English language are only accepted at English Wikipedia. Apart from that, there is already an article about the topic that you want to create, see Atru. You should create Hindi articles at Hindi Wikipedia. Click the preceding link to access Hindi Wikipedia. Regards. Hitro talk 16:34, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied your page to hi:अटरू. You need to hurry over there and remove the speedy feletion tag. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:54, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pal Pal Dil Ke Paas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 10:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ummedganj moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ummedganj, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 19:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ummedganj (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

will need much better sourcing first.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ummedganj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ummedganj, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:08, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SandeepKumarMeena! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:08, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ummedganj (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Numberguy6 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No inline citations. Phrases like "The development of this village is very bad" fail WP:NPOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ummedganj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ummedganj, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 16:31, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ummedganj has been accepted

Ummedganj, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ma Ambika Mandir, Musen Mata moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ma Ambika Mandir, Musen Mata, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 00:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:SandeepKumarMeena/Ummedganj

Hello, SandeepKumarMeena. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:SandeepKumarMeena/Ummedganj, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Amit Bhadana, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 10:28, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not doing any disruptive editing. In Amit Bhadana wikipedia article I added music videos which he have uploaded. Other youtubers also have these type of information in their wikipedia page/article. So I have updated that using proper references. SandeepKumarMeena (talk) 23:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits checkbox

Hi SandeepKumarMeena! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Gautam Adani that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 05:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Mohammed Zubair (journalist). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 19:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Your edit to Kawai, Rajasthan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 07:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have had a look at the article you created on Kawai, Rajasthan in the state it was before other editors deleted most of it. Here are some tips:

You must have got the information from somewhere. When you write an article you need to record where you got the information from in the form of citations to sources. Please only use reliable sources such as books, newspapers, government websites; do not use chat pages. Have a look at referencing for beginners.
You are not allowed to just copy chunks of text from other websites. That is called a copyright violation. What you have to do is to write the information in your own words.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Jawan (film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

Please do not remove or change an AfD message until the discussion has been closed.

— Archer1234 (t·c) 13:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder about the requirement to cite sources to verify contributions

Hello @SandeepKumarMeena. I am @Archer1234. I noticed your recent edit to Bhumika Chawla where you added a new film to the filmography table, but you did not cite a published reliable source to verify it. In addition, WP:FILMOGRAPHY says not to add future film projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source.

I went ahead and added a source for you, but please do this yourself next time and do not rely on other editors to do it for you. Remember that one of the most important Wikipedia policies (Wikipedia:Verifiability) says:

All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution.

Thanks and Happy Editing! — Archer1234 (t·c) 14:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Rajasthan Staff Selection Board. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SandeepKumarMeena (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here SandeepKumarMeena (talk) 10:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur is different from Rajasthan Public Service Commission. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board conducts selection examinations for govt employees who have pay scale up to Level-10. It is board who responsible for the selection of employees like primary teachers, clerks etc. in Rajasthan State. I am a wikipedia contributor who rectify wrong information, translate pages from one language to another, and create new pages only those are notable and I think It may be on Wikipedia and having enough valid references SandeepKumarMeena (talk) 10:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The stated reason for the block is copyright violations, but you do not address that with this request. 331dot (talk) 11:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SandeepKumarMeena (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here SandeepKumarMeena (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC) I was blocked from editing because I created a article " Rajasthan Staff Selection Board" by copying text and images from other page "Rajasthan Public Service Commission". But let me clear few things why I copied some text, templets and logos. There are two state govt. institutions for conducting competitive examinations in Rajasthan. The only difference between the two is that Rajasthan Public Service Commission conducts examinations for the recruitment of employees with salaries above 3600 Grade Pay, and Rajasthan Staff Selection Board conducts examinations for employees drawing salaries up to 3600 Grade Pay. . Since both are state government institutions. Both are related to competitive exams. Both shares same state govt logo. Therefore, the format/templete of article of both should be same, That's why I copied the logo and template. I value the Wikipedia community and the principles of open collaboration, and I am eager to continue contributing positively to the platform. I kindly request the reconsideration and lifting of the block on my account. If there are specific actions or steps I need to take to rectify the situation, please provide guidance, and I will promptly address them. Thank you for your time and consideration. I appreciate your dedication to maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia community. Sincerely,[reply]

Decline reason:

These are not grounds to violate WP:COPYRIGHT. Yamla (talk) 14:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SandeepKumarMeena (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here SandeepKumarMeena (talk) 04:38, 17 November 2023 (UTC)the owner of the both the articles is rajasthan government. so its not a copyright violations. please reconsider my request.[reply]

Decline reason:

You haven't yet done as Yamla asks below. 331dot (talk) 14:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rosguill and Yamla, the user has something of a point here, regardless of the ownership of the site. Under "Website Policy", it says "Copyright Policy: Material featured on this site may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission."[1] --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SandeepKumarMeena does now make a good point, though this was not the claim they made when I declined. The copyright policy actually imposes additional restrictions: "This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Where the material is being published or issued to others, the source must be prominently acknowledged". As Wikipedia would be publishing the material, I understand this to mean the source must be prominently acknowledged, not just copied with no attribution. I'm also not sure how we could guarantee it would never be used in a derogatory manner. The website itself does not claim the material is free of copyright concerns. That said, it could be that the Indian government disclaims copyright on government material, as many but certainly not all governments do. I'm not familiar enough with India to know if that's true. --Yamla (talk) 11:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just copied template and format from Rajasthan Public Service Commission for the article Rajasthan Staff Selection Board because both the article belongs the same niche. So I can get proper structure for the article. I changed the necessary and general details as per my article which are available on website of the board at https://rssb.rajasthan.gov.in/board, https://rssb.rajasthan.gov.in/about-us I also given enough references for support my article which are from national news portals. SandeepKumarMeena (talk) 11:37, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to think it's okay to copy from one Wikipedia article to another, without attribution. That's most definitely false and you need to clearly understand that. Please spend some time reading and understanding WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. These are challenging policies to understand, so take your time. Let us know when you have read and thoroughly understood them. --Yamla (talk) 11:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All the rajasthan state government articles which are from same category share similar templete like infobox, logos. like Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Rajasthan Police. I didn't keep the info. in infobox and changed it and write information from start by giving references. I JUST COPIED TEMPLETES AND INFOBOXES. SandeepKumarMeena (talk) 11:53, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]