User talk:SeanMon411/Archive 1

Hi, please don't remove the line on the sandbox that says "please don't remove this line". Thanks.--Rambutan (talk) 17:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Logistics Management (magazine), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Utvolfan08 17:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Lmcover.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lmcover.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to EDN (magazine)[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, SeanMon411! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule example\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 20:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages and user pages[edit]

Regarding user talk pages, it is preferred to not delete notices, but instead, to archive them. You will find how to do this here, under "When pages get too long." Your talk page is intended to serve as a place to discuss your contributions. It ends up being a sort of a history of the work you've done and the conflicts you've been in, or the praise you've received. It's alright to archive comments or warnings, but blanking your talk page is relatively less appropriate, as it is not actually yours but instead belongs to us all. Please read WP:USERPAGE and WP:TALK. When you desire to keep the "clutter" down on your user talk page, I suggest that you create archives for these messages. I would be happy to assist you in doing just that if you ask me to. You can see a sample of archives (mine) here. As for your user page, most users seem to use it as a place to describe themselves as people and/or editing entities. Many collect links to pages they are working on and/or have been working on. You user page is more "yours," in a way, than anywhere else on wikipedia, but is not intended to serve as a personal webpage either. Once again, read here to learn more about this. -- Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 15:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!!![edit]

Hello SeanMon411! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button

located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some pages to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 15:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Citing sources Neutral Point of View Describing points of view Attribution Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Etiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Resolving disputes
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Tools Village pump

Spam in Logistics Management magazine[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Logistics Management magazine, by Paultyng (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Logistics Management magazine is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Logistics Management magazine, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Logistics Management magazine itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is really needed[edit]

I've been working in large part on improving articles about magazines and journals since i joined WP--I'm now one of the many administrators here--so let me tell you what is actually needed for improving these articles, because improvement is needed, and in more respects than mentioned above. (I was meaningto get around to Elsevier one of these days, but it's so big I wanted to save it for last) With respect to trade magazines, the article should:

Give information about how frequently it is published, the starting date of publication, any previous titles, and the dates of title changes.

If it is available online, say so, and give the date of beginning availability.

List the editor in chief, if there is one. Say what company or institution he comes from. Put a link for his name and the institution name. WP uses these links in evaluating importance of the people. Even if its a red link, use it, so we know we might need an article. If the company or institution is red, check if you have the proper form.

List the major indexes that cover it--just the major ones, and just the relevant ones--for example, Chem Abs indexes every journal that ever has a chemical article, but just the chemical articles, so its only appropriate for chemistry & engineering title. If it's covered by web of science or by scopus , say so.

If it should be in Journal citation reports--a few trade magazines are--give the current impact factor in the form:

The [[2006]] [[impact factor]] is x.xx, which is 4th of 40 in the engineering subject category. the "of 40" part is to clarify if its 4th of 4, or 4th of 40. Give a footnote reference to [[Journal Citation Reports]] (brackets as specified) If you give these for any, you must give them for all journals, even if they are last in the class. But if they are not included, you don't have to say anything.

Give the circulation, if you give it for all magazines of the class. The reference for this can be BPA--if you use it include the word "audited" (and please write an article on BPA so people know what it is) but I normally use Ulrich's, even though the figures are approximate. Link to Ulrich's.

ALWAYS give the ISSN, both print and online.

Use the journal infobox template on at least all academic publications--no reason not to use it for them all. [1]

If it is a controlled-circulation journal say so, and help me write a page explaining what that is.

It should not:

List the editorial board, or any people other than the editor in chief.

Have the typical sentence used in ads and web pages: "This magazine is intended for ... (it's almost always obvious), but if the contents or orientation is much different than expected from the title, it should say so.

mention pricing, or through what packages it is available.

Optionally (this is an experiment) If it is available through major full-text service like Lexis or Ebsco , say so, linking them. If there is an embargo period, give it , using a link to [[embargo (academic publishing)|]] The symbol just before the closing brackets is a vertical pipe symbol, usually shift-backslash, so it comes out reading just embargo.

As for categories, we're still experimenting. Separate posting.

If any articles should get deleted by speedy, or threatened, please let me know and I will check what's up and give my opinion. There is a level of significance below which we do not go. Or if there are other problems. If someone suggests that any of the above material is not appropriate, please let me know so i can discuss t with him. Better me than you. DGG 23:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. Please, please, fix the existing articles before continuing to add any more.

as for article titles: The word magazine should be in the title of the article ONLY if it is part of the formal title of the publication. Usually Ulrich's is the best source for that--library catalogs follow their own peculiar rules, and what appears on the cover changes from time to time. Otherwise the distinguishing term (magazine) is to be added in parentheses, all as specified by the wikipedia manual of style, WP:MOS. Yes, WP has a style manual, and does try for consistency. Please check on the ones you moved and let me know which have to be moved back and I'll do it for you--it will usually be necessary to delete a redirect (automatic cross-reference) page, which only an admin can do. Please keep in touch. DGG 22:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Logistics Management magazine cover.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logistics Management magazine cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Logistics_management_magazine_cover.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Logistics_management_magazine_cover.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 22:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I made a couple of minor tweaks:

It's always advisable to include the article(s) where you are using the image

a) in case one editor removes it, another can reattach it later - this is actually true for all images, not just fair use.

b) in case another editor adds it to additional articles where it might not be fair use, you've staked your claim that it's fair use in the article you put it in.

I tweaked the replacability statement to one that I would use. Feel free to revert or change if you feel more comfortable.

I would also suggest that you include information if you have it about which issue of the magazine is pictured (volume/issue and/or date). If the magazine is around for a while, there may come a time when it would make sense to show what the magazine looked like at different times in it's history (with commentary on how it reflected the styles of the time or ...), and a date would be helpful then.

Thanks for taking the time to address this. ~ Bigr Tex 14:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Design News[edit]

Hi. I hate to do this but I'm going to pass the buck here. I don't expect to have much time in the next few weeks so I won't be able to be of much help. I seem to remember that DGG (talk · contribs) has done some work with magazine articles: he might be of some help and he's an excellent editor. It's actually not easy to write such articles: for one thing if you're related in some way to the magazine then you're facing problems of conflict of interest and even if you're not, there's often not much to say about magazines. Take the stub Logistics Management (magazine): it's decent and not too spammy. But what further content would be appropriate for a Wikipedia article? Maybe a list of the main contributors (although that's of dubious interest), further details on circulation number, etc. But beyond that, a further expansion of the article would require describing the place of the magazine in its field, the history of its circulation numbers, the history of its creation, comparison to competing publications, and so on. The problem with all these fantastic topics is that it's very difficult to build this content upon reliable, third-party sources. In any case, i hope this helps but really you should seek further advice from an admin who's got more time in the near future than I expect to have. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 22:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DGG conversation[edit]

when adding journal subscriptions, do not link to a free subscription web site: I shall personally remove any I see. Link to the website for the publication, at which--I would assume--there is a prominent link for free subscriptions.

Let me suggest that you add only 1 or 2 pages at a time and that they be your strongest journals, with verified circulation figures, so you can see what the reaction is. Don't go by only my reaction--I have no more influence than anyone else. And do not try to include the weakest. WP is not a directory, and the definition of a directory is "indiscriminate". DGG (talk) 18:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the confidence, and I was making you aware of the difficulties similar articles have experienced. you need not fear the possibility of being solely responsible or having control over anything--the line about WP being mercilessly edited is very true. DGG (talk) 20:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Professional Remodeler magazine cover.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Professional Remodeler magazine cover.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]