User talk:SecularIndiangirl

July 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Yona has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Yona was changed by SecularIndiangirl (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954346 on 2020-07-20T19:50:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:50, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sufism. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sufism was changed by SecularIndiangirl (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868921 on 2020-07-20T20:13:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gangadhar Adhikari, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 20:22, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The false claims without references are posted as facts. What is the proof that gangadhar adhikari worked with einstein ? SecularIndiangirl (talk) 20:25, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. --Quisqualis (talk) 21:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Ravish Kumar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drat8sub (talk) 05:29, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is absurd, i have cited 4 references from a highly credited and oldest publication house of India. If India Today is poorly Sourced information then maybe you need to change the policy. SecularIndiangirl (talk) 05:36, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I only see three, one of which is some YouTube by Politica Kida, not a reliable source, the others do not back "He is often criticized for propogating conspiracy". Please don't use Tweets as sources or call non-fiction books fictional, that alone can get you blocked if you keep it up. Here I'm talking about your edits to Devdutt Pattanaik. If you think your sources justify your text you can ask at WP:RSN if others agree. Doug Weller talk 13:26, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have quoted tweets of devdutt himself. When there is no primary source to back the claims presented in a book, it is considered as fictional by definition. SecularIndiangirl (talk) 14:29, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is your interpretation and is what we call original research. It's not allowed, and adding it to a BLP again can get you blocked or banned from the topic area. Doug Weller talk 18:12, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you dumb ? I have added his own tweets to potray who he is. Do not threaten to block me for saying the truth, i m not afraid and neither can be silenced by the hypocrites with Ego. SecularIndiangirl (talk) 18:22, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RegentsPark (comment) 14:15, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All my edits are supported by articles from reputed media houses. Thank you SecularIndiangirl (talk) 14:26, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 14:44, 21 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 00:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for egregious violations to the biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 04:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]