User talk:Shaan Lollywood

Speedy deletion nomination of Flag of Andaman and Nicobar Islands

Hello Shaan Lollywood I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Flag of Andaman and Nicobar Islands for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. I agree this article should not be deleted its is possible to work more on it Thank you.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mooseandbruce1 (talk) 06:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would like this article to be reinstated for discussion Thank you.

August 2016

Hello, I'm EvergreenFir. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Punjab, India have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Punjab, Pakistan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 06:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss your edits on the articles' talk pages. These are not minor edits, and you cannot simply cut and paste text from one page to another without indicating the source. Meters (talk) 06:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Government of Azad Kashmir

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Government of Azad Kashmir. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azad_Kashmir. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azad_Kashmir – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Savonneux (talk) 07:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Flag of Azad Kashmir has been reverted.
Your edit here to Flag of Azad Kashmir was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qMe_nTPQAI) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Political status of Hyderabad State

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Political status of Hyderabad State. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Hyderabad_State. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hyderabad_State – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Savonneux (talk) 07:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think the title Political status of Hyderabad State should be merged with Hyderabad State or as sub category of the existing page Thank you.

Your contributed article, Legal status of Hyderabad State

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Legal status of Hyderabad State. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Political status of Hyderabad State. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Political status of Hyderabad State – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. for (;;) (talk) 08:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think the title Legal status of Hyderabad State is an contested issue that involves Pakistan United Nations recognises it as a Disputed territory Thank you.

Your contributed article, Legal status of Junagadh State

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Legal status of Junagadh State. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Integration of Junagadh. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Integration of Junagadh – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Melcous (talk) 08:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Political status of Junagadh State

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Political status of Junagadh State. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Integration of Junagadh. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Integration of Junagadh – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Melcous (talk) 08:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Azad Jammu and Kashmir listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Category:Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Since you had some involvement with the Category:Azad Jammu and Kashmir redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. for (;;) (talk) 08:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Political status of East Pakistan

A tag has been placed on Political status of East Pakistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Legal status of East Pakistan

A tag has been placed on Legal status of East Pakistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Political status of Occupied Kashmir listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Political status of Occupied Kashmir. Since you had some involvement with the Political status of Occupied Kashmir redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Legal status of Occupied Kashmir listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Legal status of Occupied Kashmir. Since you had some involvement with the Legal status of Occupied Kashmir redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:27, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Occupied South Tibet listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Occupied South Tibet. Since you had some involvement with the Occupied South Tibet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:28, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recognition of East Bengal as an Independent polity listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Recognition of East Bengal as an Independent polity. Since you had some involvement with the Recognition of East Bengal as an Independent polity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Provincial Government of East Pakistan

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Provincial Government of East Pakistan. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – East Pakistan. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at East Pakistan – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. for (;;) (talk) 08:31, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please, stop adding information that fails WP:NPOV. Please, study WP:NPOV article for further understanding of Wikipedia policies Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

International recognition of East Pakistan as Bangla-desh listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect International recognition of East Pakistan as Bangla-desh. Since you had some involvement with the International recognition of East Pakistan as Bangla-desh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Occupied Khalistan listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Occupied Khalistan. Since you had some involvement with the Occupied Khalistan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Occupied Sikkim listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Occupied Sikkim. Since you had some involvement with the Occupied Sikkim redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indian annexed Kashmir listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indian annexed Kashmir. Since you had some involvement with the Indian annexed Kashmir redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC) The Republic of India has annexed Jammu and Kashmir, and illegally incorporated it into her country Thank you.[reply]

August 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, One-Pakistan policy

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, One-Pakistan policy. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – One_Unit. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at One_Unit – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Savonneux (talk) 09:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Provincial constitution of East Pakistan

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Provincial constitution of East Pakistan. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Constitution_of_Pakistan_of_1962. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Constitution_of_Pakistan_of_1962 – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Savonneux (talk) 09:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Savonneux (talk) 10:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think the page should be redirect to the page Constitution of Pakistan of 1962, Thank you.

Please pause

There is a discussion about your rapid creation of articles at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Walled Garden/POV-forking by Shaan Lollywood, so please pause for a while and do not create any more new articles until that discussion reaches a conclusion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I'm sorry, but as you have ignored all of the above messages about problems with your article creations (including many apparent duplicates, and at least one which appears to have been a copyright violation), and have not heeded my request to pause your rapid article creations while they are under discussion, I have no real alternative but to block this account temporarily. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but as we are finding more and more copyright violations in your contributions, I've now imposed a block for an indefinite length of time. This is not necessarily a long block, and you can be unblocked when we feel confident that there will be no further copyright violations from you and that you will heed the requests made above.

While blocked you cannot take part in the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Walled Garden/POV-forking by Shaan Lollywood, but if you wish to add to it then please post anything you wish to say here and I (or someone else) will copy it across for you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Two Pakistans

A tag has been placed on Two Pakistans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mar4d (talk) 11:33, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anti-Bengali sentiment

Hello, Shaan Lollywood. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Anti-Bengali sentiment, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. David.moreno72 11:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Political status of Junagadh State

A tag has been placed on Political status of Junagadh State requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://defence.pk/threads/junagadh-dispute-kashmir.37308/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Begoon ^talk 11:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Anti-Pakistani Secession Law

Hello, Shaan Lollywood,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Anti-Pakistani Secession Law should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Pakistani Secession Law .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, David.moreno72 12:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brahui nationalism listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brahui nationalism. Since you had some involvement with the Brahui nationalism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. for (;;) (talk) 12:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gujarat Swarajya Sangh

A tag has been placed on Gujarat Swarajya Sangh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 13:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hindi language movement listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hindi language movement. Since you had some involvement with the Hindi language movement redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A note in light of some ANI comments on you

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Talk page access

As you are using this talk page to continue to push your personal political opinion, I have revoked your ability to edit it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:48, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gilgit Baltistan Democratic Alliance

A tag has been placed on Gilgit Baltistan Democratic Alliance, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. USaamo ^(t@lk) 07:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]