Jump to content

User talk:Shan79

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bhagavanth Kesari, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 13:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop spreading false news. take source data from maker's of the movies, don't go by false news from funded websites.
one of the reliable source https://www.bollymoviereviewz.com/2023/10/bhagvanth-kesari-budget-day-1-box-office-collection-worldwide.html Shan79 (talk) 17:56, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhagavanth Kesari. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NaanReady (talk) 14:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are updating fake news posted on wrong websites. I have added references many times but you are still reverting.
why don’t you update genuine data which was released by makers? Why are you considering fake news as a reference? Shan79 (talk) 15:34, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bhagavanth Kesari, you may be blocked from editing. NaanReady (talk) 15:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are from I-pac team and spreading false news or you should be anti-NBK. Shan79 (talk) 15:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop spreading false news. take source data from maker's of the movies, don't go by false news from funded websites. Shan79 (talk) 17:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The source you provided, Bollymoviereviewz.com is considered unreliable per WP:ICTFSOURCES. So you must add box office from reliable sources. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 03:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What are the reliable sources you are following? Funded websites?
do you believe only funded websites? Don’t you even believe maker’s?
also I don’t see the source that you are adding here is not in the given list. So you are adding wrong data in the name of reliable sources.
also I don’t think you are the owner of this page, how are you updating these details on behalf of maker’s? They are the people who knew the truth, not so called funded websites. Shan79 (talk) 03:41, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Websites with article are considered reliable. Additionally Zoom (Indian TV channel) is Indian Television channel and subsidiary of The Times Group. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 03:44, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know Times group funded by whom? It is YSRCP government, even kids in Andhra can tell you that.if you don’t know Andhra politics then please understand the reality. Shan79 (talk) 03:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is not your state to play politics here. It is Wikipedia. See WP:POL. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t know where you live, go telugu states and see the ground reality, otherwise you better stop updating wrong details in the name of reliable sources. Shan79 (talk) 03:45, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Even this film crossed 1million in USA, without knowing reality how blindly go by fake funded websites? Shan79 (talk) 03:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As you edit Wikipedia you must also consider the policies of Wikipedia. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 03:47, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You also better not update wrong details. Let makers do that job. Shan79 (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have verified many sources from that list you given and more than 90% sites have given positive reviews then why are you updating it as a ‘mixed talk’? Shan79 (talk) 04:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bhagavanth Kesari. NaanReady (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you authorized to update fake news? What authority do you have to do that? Shan79 (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly believe that you are from I-PAC team. Shan79 (talk) 03:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We are going to bring it to Makers and director about this false propaganda. Shan79 (talk) 03:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also be ready to face legally. Shan79 (talk) 03:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NaanReady (talk) 15:07, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure, you are updating right details?
you are updating only domestic net details provided by fake sites.
why don’t you add worldwide gross details?
Though you are considering fake sites as a reference, why are you misleading people with only domestic net details and trying to prove that is the worldwide gross collection. Shan79 (talk) 16:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OTTPlay clearly says film received mixed reviews. What is the use of making it positive? Additionally sites without its own articles are considered unreliable in Wikipedia. bollymoviereviewz.com is unreliable source, see WP:ICTFSOURCES. NaanReady (talk) 16:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Even from the sources you are considering clearly saying that it domestic net only.
why are you publishing only domestic net as a worldwide gross collection.
if you don’t know right details then please stop publishing false data.
Pasitive vs mixed, yes it matters.
95% of the sites given positive reviews including sites from your so called trusted list. Then why are you considering review from 5% of your trusted sites?
Looks you are doing this intentionally and trying to spread negativity and harming makers financially.
i am not harming anyone here, instead i am trying to help to reach more people. Shan79 (talk) 17:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is not based on reviews in reception section, it is based on multiple third-party independent sources. See [1], [2], [3] the film received mixed reviews. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 17:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Most of these site are north India dominated and they are always biased. They do support only Bollywood movies and they always publish worldwide gross collections for them(sometimes they show excess numbers). But for telugu movies trying to show small numbers by publishing only domestic net amount(that too not real). Shan79 (talk) 17:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I said about "mixed reviews", not about it's box office. NaanReady (talk) 17:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding its box office, DNA India clearly says "Bhagavanth Kesari has earned Rs 68.55 crore gross worldwide in its first five days."[4] Then who says about domestic? NaanReady (talk) 17:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then why are you updating 48 cr? Shan79 (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See this riv and tell who updated to 48 crore. NaanReady (talk) 17:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just curious, why are you so concerned about this movie?
I am seeing many other movies with false numbers but looks you don’t care but concern only with this movie. Shan79 (talk) 17:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What concern? NaanReady (talk) 17:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DNA is considering source data from https://www.sacnilk.com/quicknews/NBK_108_2023_Box_Office_Collection_Day_5?hl=en
but Sacnilk is not in trusted list but site which is taking reference from this is a trusted source. Don’t you think it is funny 😄 Shan79 (talk) 19:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please read Wikipedia:No legal threats Sid95Q (talk) 18:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bro, Indian express is a legal source. Shan79 (talk) 19:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:FRUIT, If an otherwise reliable source attributes information to an unreliable source then that information is likewise unreliable. Sid95Q (talk) 20:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you reverting? Indian express is a reliable source as per Wiki recommended Wikipedia:ICTFSOURCES Shan79 (talk) 20:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:FRUIT which is Also mentioned on same page, Indian express attributes sacnilk.com which is considered unreliable. Please read comments carefully before reverting Sid95Q (talk) 20:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Collection provided by makers are not considered reliable, only third-party independent sources are considered reliable. NaanReady (talk) 02:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Be Careful with I-PAC & Anti NBK[edit]

Wrong people(I-PAC & anti-NBK) are updating wrong data and spreading negativity. Though this movie receives positive from everywhere and getting excellent collection but still spreading false news. there are few websites funding by I-PAC & YSRCP are spreading false news and these guys are taking that as reference and not considering even maker's press release statements. Shan79 (talk) 16:25, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rv reviews are positive but the source you tried to add is totally unreliable and can't be accepted on Wikipedia as per WP:ICTFSOURCES Theoder2055 (talk) 04:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody can add and remove sources from that page as per their convince. That was not owned by Wiki, someone like you have created that page. Shan79 (talk) 04:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here As explained before the source you are adding is not considered reliable per WP:ICTFSOURCES. Also please read Wikipedia:Edit warring Sid95Q (talk) 17:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of Telugu films of 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Telugu films of 2023, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bhagavanth Kesari, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RangersRus (talk) 21:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhagavanth Kesari. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
When sources differ, we show the range, not pick one of the figures - Arjayay (talk) 10:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bhagavanth Kesari, you may be blocked from editing.
As already explained, above, when sources differ, we show the range, not pick one of the figures - Arjayay (talk) 09:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Information icon Hi Shan79! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Bhagavanth Kesari several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Bhagavanth Kesari, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 10:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are breaching rules and updating false info everytime. For your info Pinkwale is not an authorized source.
if you don’t know what is correct then stop updating false info.
I hope you aware of edit policies, if not learn them first before you edit next time.
I don’t understand what benefit you get by giving false info. Stop doing this again and again.
what credibility you have to update these details? Shan79 (talk) 22:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Ponyobons mots 22:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing the right thing, other person providing wrong data and misleading with false sources, and I was trying to correct data.
Before you block someone you should check who is providing false data.
if you still want to go with wrong people and loose your credibility then your wish. Sad to say that I am loosing trust in Wiki as it is allowing false data and trusting false people without verifying what is right vs wrong. Shan79 (talk) 23:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Bhagavanth Kesari) for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Before you block me have you corrected the previous person given the right data?
what basis you are trusting that person? He is not an owner of this page and he has started updating content for last 1-2 months.
how did you allowed him to update original content?
check the history of this page and verify what was the original content before this guy modified a month ago. Shan79 (talk) 00:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also just want to let you know that my close friend is the distributor for one of the area in India.
Look this is a trend these days spreading false news using social media and now Wiki also joined in that category. Shan79 (talk) 00:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Shan79. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW (talk) 01:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shan79&oldid=1215606240"