User talk:Theoder2055

Theoder2055 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Nice work on reception. Two notes:

Dinamalar wrote that → A critic from Dinamalar wrote that
." → ".

In other words, put the period after the quote, not before it. DareshMohan (talk) 23:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DareshMohan: like could you give an example for this? Like just imagine if Dinamalar gives 3 out of 5 stars for 2011 film Markandeyan then how will you write it as you said? Theoder2055 (talk) 04:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Theoder2055: A critic from Dinamalar gave the film a rating of three out of five stars.

Ok thanks. Theoder2055 (talk) 04:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Hi - you made these two edits to an archived sockpuppet investigation. Archived investigations should not be edited by anyone other than SPI clerks. If you want to report current suspicions, you need to create a new report. I'd advise you to enable WP:TWINKLE on your account, and use that to raise the report. You need to navigate to the suspected sockpuppet's userpage, go to the Twinkle drop-down menu, select 'ARV', and then select 'Sockpuppet' from the first option it gives you, and fill in the rest of the boxes. It's pretty straightforward - much easier than doing it manually. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:38, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: I think so the user കരിപ്പോട്ടി ‎is already blocked as a sockpuppet of Eswaran Naveen so I feel it’s not necessary to report right now. You also saw his edits right same kind of reply in his talk page. But anyways thanks for the information. Theoder2055 (talk) 07:18, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have anything to add at this SPI, please do.--The Doom Patrol (talk) 09:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dhamaka film poster

Hey, I've recently uploaded a poster which depicts the main characters and release date as well

Previous one was like 2 days to go which is highlighted more than the title of the film. Which doesn't make any sense for the term poster.

Check other telugu film posters or any other languages as well. Title will be given more preference than anything.

Thanks NIKE 01 (talk) 03:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@NIKE 01: the problem is that we do not add posters which are seemed to be inappropriate. Theoder2055 (talk) 11:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suriya 42

Hi. I noticed that you redirected the page Draft:Suriya 42 to Siva (director). I was working on the draft and was about to add citations but you moved it. Please don't clear it again. The filming has already started. If you want to help expand the draft, you are very welcome to. Thank you. - CallistoR7 (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CallistoR7: Where is the source? I can’t see it. Theoder2055 (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing box office

Hello, Theoder2055. It's not clear why you have been removing box office section entirely (diff [1], [2]) despite having sources.

MOS:FILMBOXOFFICE requires us to provide "Provide a summary of the film's commercial performance" and "This information can be included under the release section (see above), the reception section, or if sufficient coverage exists, it is recommended that this information is placed in a "Box office" or "Theatrical run" section."

Therefore, your edits here do not seem to comply with the policy. On contrary, more info should be added on that instead of removing it to improve the encylopeadia. Thanks! -- Ab207 (talk) 16:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ab207: you may check the edit summary of the page. Sorry by mistake it got accidentally got removed. I was about to remove the information which was cited with a source that was unreliable as per WP:ICTFSOURCES. It’s better to have updated the box office section for other Tamil films like Varisu and Thunivu also. They also performed well crossing 250 crores and 195 crore. Theoder2055 (talk) 18:19, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 films

Please note that only released films should be added to the page at present, especially in light of poorly sourced future release dates. As you may know, release dates in Tamil cinema shift on almost a daily basis. Please consider this a warning - your last revert without discussion (and the removal of films which have actually released) was unacceptable and unencyclopaedic. Neutral Fan (talk) 13:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Neutral Fan: There is no rule like that for only released films to be there. Please check other language films like List of Telugu films of 2023 and List of Hindi films of 2023. If the release date of that particular film is postponed then it can be removed. But there are also some films in which release date is confirmed. Why you need to remove them? There is nothing to warn me in this. Please discuss with other editors also like Ab207 and SP013 and then decide whether to remove. Let’s see what those editors say about this. What does those editors say about this? Theoder2055 (talk) 15:48, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ab207: and @SP013: But at least what I was about to say is that Tamil films in which release dates are confirmed officially can be added right? Vaathi is officially confirmed to be released on Feburary 17 and also Run Baby Run is also officially confirmed to release on 3 Feb as well as Jailer is also scheduled for release on 14 April. Neutral Fan only problem is that for according to you only released films should be added but other editors didn’t say anything about this. Please note that Wikipedia is not a place for what you want the article to be. That means in the List of Telugu films of 2023 and List of Hindi films of 2023 only released films should be added right but it’s not like that. Anyways that doesn’t matter but release dates of those films which are officially confirmed they can be there in the page right? Theoder2055 (talk) 15:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, if there's an official confirmation, it should be added. However, speculations like "makers are looking to release for Pongal," can be avoided.

At the same time, editors should not judge whether the said official date is possible or not. That's not our job. Hope this helps -- Ab207 (talk) 06:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ab207: But only problem is that Neutral Fan is also removing those films in which release date are officially confirmed. There are films of 2023 in which release dates are officially confirmed. I am not going to add them until majority of the editors like @Kailash29792: and @DareshMohan: say regarding this. Some of these films which are officially confirmed include:

Run Baby Run
Vaathi (also shot in Telugu as Sir)
Borrder
Jailer
Pathu Thala
Ponniyin Selvan: II

What about these films why they can’t be added in List of Tamil films of 2023? Sometimes their release dates gets postponed not most of the times. If the release date of that either one of the films gets postponed then those particular films only can be removed right why every other films are removed which are yet to release? Theoder2055 (talk) 08:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Telugu films of 2023 and List of Hindi films of 2023 are terrible examples. If you see the corresponding 2022 pages, it becomes clear that only one-third of films are included (only films with notable actors). The Tamil pages have always been more comprehensive - detailing every weekly release, regardless of the budget. You can add a second title on the page as "Scheduled films", like how "Released films" are there, and list only confirmed projects e.g. PS2 and Jailer. The worry is that it will eventually turn into something uncontainable like this User:Neutral Fan/sandbox (Upcoming films). This is a list which I had to be pulled out of the main page a few years ago. Neutral Fan (talk) 09:39, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that truly but we will wait for other editors also to say about this. Theoder2055 (talk) 15:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Naane Varuven (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Naane Varuven (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 27 § Naane Varuven (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 19:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

friend

Monhiroe wants to be your friend! Friends promote WikiLove and make people happy. This user wants to be your friend because he likes you. You can contact me at my talk page. Oh, and hopefully you will be my friend too!

Become someones friend! Add {{subst:Friend}} to their talk page.

Monhiroe (talk) 17:13, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pathu Thala poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pathu Thala poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saamaniyan poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saamaniyan poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saamaniyan

Hello, Theoder2055. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saamaniyan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mudhal Paadal

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DareshMohan (talk) 00:44, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]