User talk:Shmueldabomb4411

April 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Religious views on masturbation—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I made the edit because I significantly enhanced the main article (which was clearly biased - so I added many primary sources as citations and reorganized it to be more evidence-based and objective), and the section I edited was a direct quote from the main article. The edits to this section reflect the edits to the main article. What about it did not appear constructive? Shmueldabomb4411 (talk) 10:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that minimizing the duplication would allow the reader to reference the main article for the most up-to-date material while getting a gist of Judaism's perspective on the matter. Shmueldabomb4411 (talk) 10:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]