User talk:Simmo676

Boro players

Hi, the Boro page is without Ravanelli, or Branco, or Festa, and you cannot even get a hint that many of those good players were at some point in Boro. Meanwhile there is no objective criteria of who was notable or not, at least under a "former players", these players shall be listed. However obstruction of listing does not seem so constructive to me, and the list of "notable players" there is nothing more than an award thingy, without any respect to others. User:Turcopolis , 26.03.2008 —Preceding comment was added at 07:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hi, I noticed you are making a lot of edits to Middlesbrough FC related articles, but not stating what your edits are about on the edit summary. Could you please state what your edits are about on the edit summary? Thanks. -- Mattythewhite 10:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Sure thing, I'll start doing that. Simmo676 15:42, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. -- Mattythewhite 16:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great update on our history simmo. Im a total Boro anorak and have been compiling my own stats for nigh on 20 years now. If you need any help feel free to give me a bell. CheersShaun71 22:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates

Can you substitute on your subpages all svg-images for railwaydiagrams, which are duplicates, with the other one ? that will be nice. You can find them here. The filenames start with "BSicon" and contain the substring "STB" somewhere behind. Thank you. 84.150.215.245 11:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done, as requested. --Simmo676 12:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

its Newcastle United —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.2.98.123 (talk) 21:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Esk Valley Line

I see you reverted me making the template box on this article fixed width, with good reason. However, the template already has "multi-line problems", which I was trying to fix. Is there a way to sort this out, or must we put up with the gaps in the line? →Ollie (talk • contribs) 22:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any multi-line problems at any point on the line at the moment. Where abouts do you see gaps? --Simmo676 22:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I've got plenty. Above Middlesborough, at the Picton-Battersby Line and Rosedale Branch junctions, and at the WRMU Railway junction. A litte experimenting shows that it's my browser (Opera) that's causing the problem - it forces the longer lines to break instead of making the box wider. I might have a little look at resolving the problem without resorting to fixing the width at some point. Cheers anyway, →Ollie (talk • contribs) 22:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Esk Valley Line

Thanks for your corrections to my work in the Whitby area on this one. I think I'd lost control of my eyeball movements by the time I transferred it to the article! Britmax 21:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I know how you mean, it can get pretty complex that code. Very good work on the additions though! --Simmo676 22:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boro Editing

Cheers for help with the editing of the Boro history, I'm going back season by season trying to building up specific details of each. I'm also going to make a history of kits when I get round to it. Any other ideas?

--Markh991 14:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Im doing exactly the same Mark. Got a great site from a mate who now lives in the US who has the best collection of Boro shirts bar none. If you need any help let me know Shaun71 22:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Middlesbrough crest updated.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Middlesbrough crest updated.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boro page.

Good job on the work you've been doing on it sire.Mr Cool 17:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boro Squad Numbers

Hi, seeing as you are a Middlesbrough fan, you might be able to help me with some of the past squad numbers for players in this article History of Middlesbrough F.C., I've got the most recent ones, but not any of the obscure ones, your help will be most appreciated NapHit 20:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

James Milner Career section

Not really asking for full feedback on this article (although I wouldn’t mind it). I’d just like to know what you feel the best way the divide up the Career section is, by Club, by season, not at all or some other way. Please leave your reply under the section in my talk page named “Milner Career section”. Buc 16:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mido

You selectively choose to mention the alleged racist chants at mido from Newcastle fans but neglect to mention previous allegations of it by West ham and Southampton fans. You also choose to neglect mentioning that neither Middlesbrough FC or the FA chose not to take any action over this matter.

There is no need need for these inflammatory allegations to be posted on a Wiki. These types of comments belong on football forums.

As for the Guardian article , a Newcastle fanzine has complained to the press commission about the author of the article as it was written with ulterior motives by a Sunderland fan.

http://www.true-faith.co.uk/html/Features/misunderstood.htm

If you want to edit the post and mention all the facts about the allegations, thats fine, but if you leave it as an attack on ALL newcastle fans as it currently is, then we have a problem. (Perhaps you have an agenda against Newcastle fans too!)

Like I say have reported the post to Wiki to let them decide wether or not it should be left in, after that we will decide the state of play and decide which course of action we will take. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bert Shaft (talk • contribs) 11:44, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YOur recent edit

Nice edit, I am satisfied with that.

Lets hope that in the interests of Middlesbrough and Newcastle fans, people leave it that way. (I still think that it uneccessary on a Wiki though) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bert Shaft (talk • contribs) 12:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...

St. Willibrord's Day

Salutations, Simmo676! Here's wishing you the jolliest St. Willibrord's Day possible! Love, Yeanold Viskersenn 14:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joh Marshall

Hallo, I've removed him from the dab page because redlinked entries are only allowed if they have links from elsewhere. If you mention him in another article with a redlink for him, then by all means put him back on the dab page. PamD (talk) 18:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Middlesbrough FC Records

I think this is pretty much ready to go live. Ive been away from Wikipedia for ages, surprised nobody finished it up but I've added any missing data and now it should be OK to add. Not sure where you want to add it, or on a seperate page, so I'll leave that to you or Mofs as you both seem to be doing good work on the article. Cunners (talk) 14:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Grounds

See my note on Jonathon Grounds' talk page. Why have you moved it to Jonathon from Jonathan despite several sources having his spelling as Jonathan? Peanut4 (talk) 22:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Bach

Hi - I see you edit articles relating to Middlesbrough FC. I have created an article on Philip Bach, who was Boro's chairman. Can you add anything from your reference books? Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 08:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

William Victor Fox

I've written an article for Fox, but it's almost exclusively from the cricketing perspective - Fox had a substantial county career with Worcestershire - so the footballing stuff is almost non-existent; I only have his list of clubs from his obituary in Wisden. I thought it better to leave it at that rather than try to add details I'm not familiar with. Loganberry (Talk) 11:21, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 23:10, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Middlesbrough crest old.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Middlesbrough crest old.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley Award

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Elipongo/SmileyAward--Unionhawk (talk) 21:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

Herold Goulon

Hello, Simmo676. You have new messages at Sandahl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Orphaned non-free image File:Middlesbrough crest old.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Middlesbrough crest old.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 02:56, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Simmo676. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]