User talk:Simonvino

October 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to False accusation of rape has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: False accusation of rape was changed by Simonvino (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907977 on 2018-10-01T22:49:50+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 22:53, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Simonvino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no idea who Nsmutte is and I am certainly not a "sock" or a "false flag" account. You are backing up an indefinite block based on one edit I made to restore what I believe to be objectively a better article. Simonvino (talk) 22:55, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The statement you made below indicates there's clearly more going on here, as this account engaged in no such discussion on the article's talk page or on ANI. Yamla (talk) 23:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unbelievable. I make a good faith effort to reach out and have a serious discussion about the article on its talk page as suggested at the ANI I was dragged into by agenda-driven editors, and my reward - after condescension from those same editors - is a presumptive block based on whatever they felt they needed to justify it. Simonvino (talk) 22:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's strange, because you don't ever seem to have made any other edit, including any "ANI I was dragged into". Want to explain that? Black Kite (talk) 23:01, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite:Haven't made any other edit, and yet you blocked me for "disruption." Want to explain that? I happened to restore a good, well-thought edit that was made by another editor. You have apparently decided on your POV and you are using admin privileges to enforce it. Was my edit vandalism? No. Was my edit controversial? Perhaps. Did I get a warning for making a controversial edit? No. By the way, I was trying to go to the talk page when you blocked me. I was editing this article as an IP before I registered and I am well-aware of the controversy surrounding it. But I'm glad you were able to get your kicks on that block button. Simonvino (talk) 23:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: see above

@Black Kite: I see you filed an SPI. I hope it's expedited so we can clear this up sooner rather than later. Simonvino (talk) 23:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine - just point us to where the ANI that you were "dragged into" is, so we can sort this out quickly. There's a couple of IPs that have commented at Talk:False accusation of rape, and none at all that have commented at the relevant ANI. The previous ANI on this subject was in 2016. Black Kite (talk) 23:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal to the Unblock Ticket Request System or the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org. Black Kite (talk) 01:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]