User talk:Singaporeano

Welcome!

Hello, Singaporeano, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Wanderer57 (talk) 13:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hujia.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Hujia.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008 (http://spam.shanghaiist.com)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. MER-C 09:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help Request

{{helpme}} Can someone look through my contributions and tell me why they have all been deleted please? They were all very appropriate links that I added and someone's deleted it thinking they were spam. And they are not! Singaporeano (talk) 20:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering about this as well and I left some notes, hoping to get an answer soon. It will probably take a while because the people who can answer may not be online.

Please note that use of the ~~~~ at the end of your entries will cause the system to insert your name and the date and time. This makes it much easier to follow a conversation. Best wishes, Wanderer57 (talk) 18:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I'm removing the {{helpme}} template from your page as it appears Wanderer57 has already helped you. If you need anything else, let me know! --omtay 38 19:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Singaporeano. I can't speak for the users who removed the links, but I would have removed them as well as not suitable under our style guideline on external links. The site you have been posting in numerous articles is a blog and forum. As such it falls under multiple sections of the "links to be avoided" section of the guideline I cited, including entries 2, 6, 9, 11 and 14. Moreover, many of the pages you are adding the links to are biographies of living people, and such pages have much more rigorous standards for external links—they must be of the highest quality and in full compliance with Wikipedia official policies and external links guidelines. Furthermore, since the site is not a reliable source, the links added to biographies of living persons must not contain controversial or negative content, which a number did, such as the user submitted comments on one of the Paris Hilton links.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there again! I have again removed the {{helpme}} tag from your page. Unless you have any further questions to ask, please do not re-ad this template. If you do have further questions, please add {{helpme}} below this discussion and state your new question. Happy editing! --omtay 38 00:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gays.com_screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gays.com_screenshot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 10:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gays.com logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gays.com logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:17, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of bishops of the Methodist Church in Singapore (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No evidence this meets list notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of bishops of the Methodist Church in Singapore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of bishops of the Methodist Church in Singapore, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 09:19, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Singaporeano! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SK2242 (talk) 09:19, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from St Andrew's Cathedral, Singapore into Anglican Diocese of Singapore. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kong Hee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Breach of trust. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rony Tan

Hello Singaporeano,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rony Tan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of sign languages. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a list of languages, not a list of dialects. A dialect is not a language; it is a subset of a language. For example, in the United States there are dozens of dialects of English. One of those is Southern American English, but Wikipedia does not describe it as a language. If you go to Languages of North America you won't find it. Sundayclose (talk) 15:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Mail reference at Heber Jentzsch

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Heber Jentzsch. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 13:49, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT history in Singapore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Visa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of bishops of the Methodist Church in Singapore

Hello, Singaporeano. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of bishops of the Methodist Church in Singapore, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of bishops of the Methodist Church in Singapore has been accepted

List of bishops of the Methodist Church in Singapore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 02:49, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rony Tan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rony Tan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rony Tan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re. reverting mentioning a cultured meat product in Agriculture in Singapore

Hi, Singaporeano. You recently reverted my edit to Agriculture in Singapore#History. The reason you gave was "Blatant advertising of a commercial product with no relevance to agriculture in Singapore".

I disagree and ask for undoing the revert (potentially w/ some changes) for the following reasons:

First, cultured meat is part of cellular agriculture, which itself is a form agriculture. Then, the cultured meat product in question was approved by Singapore for its commercial market. So I don't see how your "... no relevance to agriculture in Singapore" can be true.

Next, you called my edit "blatant advertising of a commercial product". I don't think that is fair: the source I cite is the Singapore Food Agency itself, and the event is notable since Singapore is the first country in the world that approved commercial sale of a cultured meat product.

Please let me know if you still disagree. Thanks. Plasmastate (talk) 18:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Singaporeano. Unless you object or have suggestions on how to improve it, I'm going to restore my edit. Thanks. Plasmastate (talk) 21:55, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Singaporeano. After not getting any feedback from you, I restored my edit. However, it was quickly reverted by you again. I assume thus that you disagree w/ some of my points in the first message in this thread. Could you please briefly state your reasons behind your last revert? If I don't hear from you in a week, I'm going to restore my edit. Thank you. Plasmastate (talk) 21:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I said very clearly, your link is blatant advertising of a commercial product and has no place on that particular wiki. If you revert again, I will not hesitate to escalate this to an admin. Singaporeano (talk) 06:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Singaporeano, thanks for a reply.

If you don't have anything to add, I'm going to ask for a third opinion on this dispute via the dispute resolution noticeboard. Plasmastate (talk) 20:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you are so adamant about this makes me now even more convinced that you're there to advertise a commercial product. I will stay on top of this and fight tooth and nail to have your link off the page. Singaporeano (talk) 03:37, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Singaporeano, FYI I just submitted a request for a dispute resolution for this dispute. Plasmastate (talk) 16:44, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another source that I would add to the original edit: Waltz, E. Club-goers take first bites of lab-made chicken. Nat Biotechnol 39, 257–258 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00855-1. Plasmastate (talk) 17:14, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Singaporeano, FYI: this section may be closed in favor of the corresponding section of the article's talk page. Plasmastate (talk) 21:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]