User talk:Sithcj

This user is a student editor in University_of_Florida/African_American_Literature_I_(Fall_2020) .

Welcome!

Hello, Sithcj, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 01:59, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Woot woot!! You're killing the editing game! Mr.Ek0 (talk) 16:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review for William Hannibal Thomas Wikipedia article. This article is missing a lead paragraph. The first sentence is a good start, but more content would be ideal. The “Critics” section that was added is relevant to the article. This addition is a smart way of expanding this work, especially since the critics are mentioned in a previous section. Since this is an article about William Thomas, I would suggest adding more substance to the content directly on him. His early life, career, and death sections seem very thin compared to the “critics” section. This should be less noticeable for the article to be properly balanced. The tone of the added section is neutral, and the sources are trustworthy. The article is organized. The portrait of William Thomas is helpful in putting a face to the name. Adding another photo, perhaps the cover of his book, would not hurt. I would suggest writing a summary for his work “The American Negro.” A summary would probably advance a reader’s comprehension of the “critics” section of the article. Good luck with the article. Ppetriy (talk) 05:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review for William Hannibal Thomas Wikipedia page. With this being a newly developed page, I definitely say great job. You are continuously adding edits and information that is crucial to this page’s success. The information was very straight forward and was not biased. However, I would add a few more details and some more information to the biography pages. This would help readers grasp a deeper understanding of his background and history. But, the photo you added is a helpful visual for the readers. Overall, great job on the page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madwright (talk • contribs) 15:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]