User talk:Skier Dude/archive/archive Jan 11

Photograph of Ellis R Dungan[edit]

You seem to have deleted this image no evidence of permission when I had already forwarded the email from Ohio County Public Library to OTRS. The email from the Library releasing the image as Public Domain (on 29 June 2007) was forwarded to OTRS on 22nd of December. Please do let me know on why was this not considered. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 19:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i added these two posts on topic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Republic_of_China_%E2%80%93_Pakistan_relations . I don't know how to license an image. Could you please guide me in this regard. Add these three images on that article. These images are present and drawn from Pakistan Post Official Website.... Also, I want to add some image on my college page Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore. Guide me how to add license codes on those images which i snapped by myself. Because whenever i add some image on page which i wrote mostly, some person add tag of speedy delete with it. I am doctor, and want to help in medical topics. I love to, but confusing policies of wikipedia forcing me to quite this channel ;( could you please please please guide me. I could give support from college authorities in all forms, because i heard that wikipedia support mailing services as well. So it would be nice of you if you guide me in at least these fronts of image licensing. It would be great full of you. i asked couple of guys before, but they are just authoritative not cooperative, killing purpose of wikipedia of "Sharing Portal" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.faizanali (talk • contribs) 03:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted file[edit]

You deleted "File:The Signs of Jesus' Second Coming.jpg" because it was "Redundant copy of non-Commons file in the same file format: File:Jesus Second Coming Book.jpg". However the copyright permissions are not the same. File:Jesus Second Coming Book.jpg was uploaded as "Fair use" and was flagged for deletion. The "File:The Signs of Jesus' Second Coming.jpg" had received explicit permission from the publisher. Unfortunately you deleted the one with explicit permission and left the "Fair use" one. Can this be corrected? --Geoffry Thomas (talk) 08:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The one here (not commons) would be deleted any way becuase if was not used in the article space. All of the relevant information is included in the OTRS ticket, so there's really no need to have two identical images that have the same information. Skier Dude (talk) 04:02, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good, I see that the OTRS ticket information was copied to the older file. Thanks --Geoffry Thomas (talk) 09:08, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trial Map Borovets.jpg[edit]

Regarding: 04:32, 29 December 2010 Skier Dude (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Trial Map Borovets.jpg" ‎ (F4: Lack of licensing information) Hi, please restore the image Trial Map Borovets.jpg. We have rights to use it as we have ordered it do be worked out and we also have the design company permission for that. Probably it must be tagged as cc-by-2.0-map-of|region but I wasn't sure as I'm new to Wikipedia and not quite familiar to image licenses. Thank you. Katinna (talk) 09:14, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Cite errors[edit]

Those changes aren't going to do what you desire. The errors are generated by the Cite extension and namespace is controlled through {{broken ref}}. For template namespace, it is all or none, and we do get any number of broken templates. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 14:33, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was led to believe from this Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Prevention of category inclusion that even though the cite.php was generating the error, the inclusion of the 'nocat' would prevent that error from being transcluded into the category if included within the template that's causing the error. If that's not the case, I presume that there's no way to "force" a non-inclusion of a page into a specific category...? Any thoughts on how to do that? Skier Dude (talk 03:57, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You stuck the nocategory inside Help:Cite errors/header, which is just a header. Nocategory suppresses categories only in a template that supports the feature. I can't think of any way to suppress the category on a cite error, as the error is generated by a software extension that we can't get into. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 04:45, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please Restore the Monogram[edit]

Regarding: Lack of licensing information this is official monogram pic provided by the president of CAAB Syed Agha Faisal Shah to various media (print, online, and television) on the eve of the Silver Jubilee Ceremony of Chiltan Adventurers A B . As a guest from media to attend the ceremony, I have official permission to use this monogram image.

Kindly restore this monogram at your earliest convenience please.--Jogazai 20:42, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All claims of "I have permission" must be verified through the OTRS system by the actual copyright holder. Please follow this link and follow the instructions to have the copyright holder verify the release of the copyright. Skier Dude (talk 03:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic block logs[edit]

Hi! Regarding my AWB request, what does a problematic block log indicate? Hey Mid (contribs) 13:00, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Files without a license[edit]

Hi!

I'm doing a cleanup of files without a license. You have uploaded a lot as you can see on this list. I suggest we choose one file (perhaps File:Please choose a more precise name.jpg and license that with {{PD-text}} and just make all the other files a redirect to that file. That way we should also get rid of a lot of duplicate files. That will be a great help.

What do you think of that? --MGA73 (talk) 12:47, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We have {{protected generic image name}} we can add instead. Redirects will not work at the moment. I tested with a redirect to File:Please use descriptive file names.jpg but at the moment files on Commons "win" if there is nothing but a redirect on Wikipedia. --MGA73 (talk) 23:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've found the chronic issue with image redirects - they're quite wonky (to be less than technical :) - protected images even more so. That's why there's so many; they don't take up much space & are easy to track (via the way you've just done). Until the underlying software starts dealing with this issue, best leave as is, IMHO. Skier Dude (talk) 03:15, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. We need system to be changed before we can use redirects. --MGA73 (talk) 06:27, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About Borovets page[edit]

I posted a message some time ago (Trial Map Borovets.jpg), but I did not received an answer. The map I uploaded was deleted. Please, can you tell me what should I do to get the image restored. Katinna (talk) 13:26, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Köppchen[edit]

Please restore the article Patrick Köppchen that you Speedy Deleted without so much as even a note to myself as the article's creator. The subject of the stub-article is a professional elite level ice hockey player who is notable per WP:NHOCKEY. Dolovis (talk) 05:12, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Skier Dude (talk) 08:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request[edit]

Hello,

On 7 April 2009, between 1:11 and 1:13, you deleted the files:

The reason was "F5: Unused non-free media".

This a request for undeletion of those files, for the following reason.

The files used to illustrate the article Vatican euro coins and the different articles on the respective euro values. As they are non-free images of "national" sides of euro coins (see Template:Non-free currency-EU coin national), their description pages also included a fair use rationale. At that point, all was well. However, the problem arose when those Wikipedia files were removed from the articles on 29 March 2009 by a user (see diff.), who also replaced them by links to copies that had been uploaded to Commons. Unfortunately, that user did so without regard for the fact that the images were not free and that, consequently, the copies that had been uploaded to Commons were there against the Commons policy and they would eventually get deleted from the Commons site (see for example Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Euro coins.jpg). So, at that point when, in April 2009, you deleted in good faith the Wikipedia files, they had indeed been temporarily "unused" for about a week, but normally they should have been in use, because they should never have been removed from the articles by the user. Ideally, that user's action would have been noticed and undone and the files put back into place in the articles. Unfortunately, apparently nobody noticed it quickly enough between March 29 (removal) and April 7 (deletion) and the anomaly continued to this day. Anyways, better late than never. Now, Commons is currently in a process of deleting the non-free copies (yes, it did take time) and it will become even more necessary that we restore the Wikipedia files, so that the images can be in place in the articles. I think the copies on Commons will probably be deleted soon and it would be nice to have our Wikipedia images already back in place by then.

Consequently, could you please undelete the files mentioned? I hope my explanation was clear. Thanks in advance for your help.

-- Asclepias (talk) 05:17, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me revert these edits?[edit]

You posted a notification on my userpage, indicating that the file that I have uploaded is not in used, but in fact, the article that has been using it it has been vandalised multiple time succesively by an anonymous IP user. Since you are an administrator, I believe you have a rollback power to undone the damages. Thank you in advance! ^_^ SyFuel ^Ignite _Burned 06:35, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jpsnes_fp.png and File:Jpsnes_shot.png images[edit]

According to the template you posted, the images File:Jpsnes_fp.png and File:Jpsnes_shot.png are fair-use images not used in any articles. They are indeed fair use images, but they are not orphaned. Both are still in use in the following article: Jurassic Park (SNES game) Please double-check to make sure that the templates for those images are what you intended. Thanks Bumm13 (talk) 07:22, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Both images were removed from the article which seems to be when Skier Dude tagged them as orphaned, however, neither images has a fair-use rationale, so I tagged them with that reason. In my opinion they don't appear to be able to comply with the 10 non-free content criteria. ww2censor (talk) 17:22, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've rolled back the orphan tag, it doesn't appear to be an issue on this article, but if the same type of vandalism continues, let me or any admin know, or post it at WP:RFPP to take a look at protection options. THanks. Skier Dude (talk) 05:45, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kagome_85[edit]

User:Kagome_85 is User:Ilovetocuddle2010

Kagome_85 is banned from Wikipedia but has made a account to get around the ban. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.158.50 (talk) 09:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC) boomeranged Skier Dude (talk) 05:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On Jungle Trails Image[edit]

		Civility Award
		You are very courteous to notify me about the deletion; many people do not do this Schmausschmaus (talk) 12:44, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AZ schools[edit]

Thanks for tagging all those new Arizona school articles with talk pages (using your bot). I made so many of them in November, and it took me a while to realize the need for talk pages. Raymie (t • c) 01:52, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I inserted an entry for God's Church and it was deleted.[edit]

What am I doing wrong? Please reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wkdemers (talk • contribs) 06:52, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I'm failing to understand where my error is.[edit]

If my sources aren't good enough then the sources for the subjects "Christianity", "New Testament" "Jesus Christ" even "God" as a whole are no more valid; the faith (which is not a denomination) for which I speak is a direct and pure product of these, and these ARE THE SOURCES. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wkdemers (talk • contribs) 07:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More detailed assistance needed and requested please...[edit]

On Wiki page "Jesus" what RELIABLE source is there showing that Jesus Christ was a real man other than the Holy Bible? Jesus has no record of birth or death other than the Holy Bible so what does His church need above the Holy Bible as proof of "NOTABILITY" as you call it to have a spot here with it's creator? I am not an educated man according to the world (but according to Jesus I am very educated in His Doctrine) but am no fool, please help me find simple instructions as the large words used on the Wiki instruction pages explaining the operation of this exercise are not settling well with my understanding. In other words, can you please break it down? I'm a small person seeking helpful assistance. -Respectfully W.K.DEMERS Wkdemers (talk) 06:34, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:IClaudius.JPG[edit]

On my talk page you wrote:

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:IClaudius.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the file and the related article. It turns out that someone uploaded another image of the book and substituted it for my image -- this is of a first edition. Wik policy is to show the first edition of a book to illustrate an article whenever possible. As my uploaded image is not a first edition, I am now (I can't believe I'm doing this!) asking that my uploaded image be deleted. Jason Palpatine (talk) 06:58, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!![edit]

Thanks you for reverting the damages and placing back the file back into its original position. Again, thank you!! XD SyFuel ^Ignite _Burned 18:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do suppose I was a tad brash there :)[edit]

Please accept my apology for my display of impatience. Goodnight (or day...) :)

I do suppose I was a tad brash there :)[edit]

Please accept my apology for my display of impatience. Goodnight (or day...) :) LET TRUTH PREVAIL!!! 07:19, 17 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wkdemers (talk • contribs)

I am not looking any message from you Dude,--Jogazai 08:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Rollback[edit]

Could i have rollback rights on Wikipedia? please reply. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 13:29 17 January 2011 (UTC)

My Images[edit]

Hi, following your message- the images I uploaded were created in our lab, and it seems as though it says so too when I go on edit. However, I still get messages saying we didn't specify the copyrights. Am I missing something? Sorry and thank you. Paenigenome (talk) 09:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

→ their talk page Skier Dude (talk) 21:59, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify[edit]

Thank you for raising concerns about non-free use of copyright images. I don't understand what it is you would have me change. I've outlined the rationale as stipulated in the guidelines, in so far as I understand them. What am I missing here? Bverter (talk) 01:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

→ their talk page

A small request[edit]

Hi Skier Dude, I have a small request if you can do. Can you delete the previous versions of this files (this and this). That's all what am asking, so I hope that you will delete. Thank you in advance. InfamousPrince 14:55, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you supply a better source for #1, other than Konami - and #2 was reverted by J Greb who asked "any indication which is the initial release?" - you reverted without an answer... would need that information before doing anything with the files. Skier Dude (talk) 04:17, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can delete the previous versions, there is no point, he will reverted it back, no matter what I do. So please do that. Thank you. InfamousPrince 10:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done

Vandal who's page you deleted[edit]

For personal reasons I do not want to mention his name but I have decided to write a professional letter to the user who's page you deleted so I can see what was the reasoning for his vandalisim and see if he can edit constructively in the future if he is unblocked.

--Thebirdlover (talk) 05:21, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're asking for - could you be a bit more specific? or was this just an 'FYI' Skier Dude (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was just informing you about it. --Thebirdlover (talk) 06:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Skier Dude (talk) 22:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Extract signature from a photo?[edit]

Hi Skier Dude! Can you please extract the signature from this poster? Or, if you can't, do you know anyone who can? Please? Novice7 | Talk 07:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the signature is over part of the subject; if it were independent then the background could be duplicated over the signature... but with the other part, I'm not sure it would look correct. You can make a request at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Maintenance/Images for cleanup] - there's several links on that page for various groups that might be able to help. Skier Dude (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. I learned that the signature is not going to do any help to any articles. Thank you. Novice7 | Talk 09:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Skier Dude (talk) 22:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dweck photo[edit]

I have made the Sonya, Poles photo a part of the Michael Dweck article, so it is no longer an orphaned image, and should support its fair use exception. Please let me know if what I've done isn't sufficient or appropriate. - Swiss Mister in NY (talk) 13:13, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As long as the image is in use and there's an adequate FuR, which appears to be the case for both, there shouldn't be any problems. Skier Dude (talk) 21:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MacRobertsonGHS.png[edit]

G'day Skier Dude. Thanks for noting the orphaned status of this file. However, as I've noted at the talk page, I'm waiting for an offline user to send me a copy of the school's preferred logo. If you could hold off, I'd appreciate it. This has been discussed with Courcelles at User_talk:Courcelles/Archive_54#MacRobertsonGHS.png and I left a note at the talk page for the file at File_talk:MacRobertsonGHS.png. -danjel (talk to me) 14:28, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's a 7-day waiting period for the image to be used; if after that time it's not used it'll be deleted. After that, any admin/sysop can restore the image if it would be put back into use - no image really disappears. Skier Dude (talk) 21:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. Yeah I know, but it's just effort. :P :) I'll give them 6 days and then restore the image to the article. -danjel (talk to me) 02:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Jean Pain image copyright[edit]

Thanks for the clearer advice on the Jean Pain image Skier Dude. I have forwarded the original permission email, that is included in the details of the image, to:

permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
date Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:51 AM
subject Fwd: FW: Mother Earth News - Jean Pain image

I notice the date for deletion is now! So I've left a message on the discussion page on the image, hopefully admins will see that. If further advice is needed, please continue to use my talk page. Regards Leighblackall (talk) 23:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

→ their talk pageSkier Dude (talk) 22:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ponniyin Selvan (2012 film)[edit]

I had nominated this film related article for deletion per WP:PROD on 16 January. The film has not started its production or even is not confirmed by any official sources. But some IP users removed the tag without citing any reason a day prior to its proposed deletion date. Can you please delete that article or should I introduce the tag again and wait for another 7 days? --Arfazph (talk) 06:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD'd on procedural basis: see WP:Articles for deletion/Ponniyin Selvan (2012 film) Skier Dude (talk) 17:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed images[edit]

I logged on this morning and saw you removed some of my images. Please explain why. I own these images and have every right to post them here. Ryrota (talk) 06:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

→ thier talk page Skier Dude (talk) 22:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted pages[edit]

Hi Skier Dude-

You recently deleted two pages I created on episodes by season of the web series "You've Got," citing that they duplicate another topic. I can't find any duplicative pages and was hoping you could help me locate them.

Re: separating the episodes by season on separate articles, I was merely following a template from the tv show "The Big Bang Theory." See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Bang_Theory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Big_Bang_Theory_episodes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Big_Bang_Theory_episodes_(season_1)

Can you help me understand what I did wrong?

-D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpmalone1983 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpmalone1983 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

images deleted[edit]

Hi, I have been editing Kenny Aaronson's page under his guidance to make it more accurate. All the information is coming from the musician himself. I have twice added images, which he has permission from the photographers to use and you keep deleting them (kennyaaronson.jpg kennyaaronson2.jpg and kennyaaronson3.jpg). I would like to have an image on his page, although smaller than the one that was there (could not figure out how to resize it).

Thank you Cheryl (user: bellairecBellairec (talk) 18:51, 25 January 2011 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bellairec (talk • contribs) 18:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITunes tagging on radio station articles[edit]

Wasn't sure where to post this since the talk page for radio stations has been deleted. Do you suppose it is worth while if someone puts a little blurb in the article for each station that supports ITunes tagging so people won't have to look around the dial trying to find a station? Bobdavcav (talk) 23:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing that any talk pages that you had created were deleted... so I'm not sure what you're referring to. The group that would probably give the best information on this would probably be at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Radio or maybe at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Apple Inc.. Skier Dude (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MAzovia[edit]

Skier, I wish if you could backup your changes in Mazovia article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rejedef (talk • contribs) 01:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The changes I made were only the deletion of deleted images -and you reverted one of them and put back a link to a deleted image. What specifically are you asking - for the restoration of the images? Skier Dude (talk) 01:59, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, actually I wonder if you could just restore the previous version. Pages regarding Mazovia, Mazovians and Mazovian language are very much in my interest. I change them bit by bit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rejedef (talk • contribs) 02:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing to restore - the images are gone and would simply give links that look like this File:Mazovian clothing.jpg. See Wikipedia:Red link for information regarding regarding redlinks. Please remember that any editor can redact any article, so if you're going to edit here you need to be willing to have all of your additions edited in the future. The axiom here is "If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here." So - there's nothing to revert here, as the redlinked image links will simply be removed by another editor or by a automated bot that does this. Skier Dude (talk) 02:23, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Equinox D&BC Logo.png[edit]

Hello. Yep, the article was deleted and as such this file is no longer deleted. Please put a request for deletion forward :) 86.16.4.244 (talk)| —Preceding undated comment added 06:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Woops, forgot to sign in on that one! Yep, Please delete the file :) --Joe O'Dell (Vie ascenseur) - :) (talk) 08:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

how to put a logo on ?[edit]

hey man im trying to put the Edge 96.1 logo on and ive been searching around how to do it can you please give me simple instructions on how to upload it. that would be nice thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theedge961 (talk • contribs) 06:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User blocked-COI/usernameSkier Dude (talk) 22:19, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PRI Logo.png[edit]

Thanks, I see it's been removed from the article again. I fixed the quality problems with the picture and re-uploaded it to the article. --Slashme (talk) 07:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]