User talk:Slugger O'Toole/Archive 8
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
Category:Actors from Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for discussion
Category:Actors from Dedham, Massachusetts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ミラP 01:26, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
Hi Slugger O'Toole! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
DYK for Dedham Covenant
On 2 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dedham Covenant, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Dedham Covenant was meant to be eternally binding? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dedham Covenant. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dedham Covenant), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Margaret M. McChesney moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Margaret M. McChesney, has unclear notability: first female lawyer to appear before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court would be notable ; the. first to appear before the full bench might not be. incubate in draftspace. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 11:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
March 2020 at Women in Red
   Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Topics
You are a very good editor, a content creator of whom we definitely need more of around here on Wikipedia. So I ask you, why do you have to keep poking bears? You're already firmly banned from the KofC. Do you want to be banned from homosexuality next? Arbitration enforcement is on top of this one, unlike the Knights. Do you have any idea of the history of the article, between Roscelese and Contaldo80 and Esoglou and others? Esoglou was permanently exiled from Wikipedia by ArbCom. I hate to say Roscelese is in the right here, but she is a good-faith editor whose opinions should not be discounted or set aside so easily as you are doing. The best thing that could happen right now is for you to realize it's Lent, disengage from this topic, go edit in something inconsequential for 5-6 weeks, and see when Easter dawns whether or not it's really worthwhile for you to be messing around at contentious topic areas, against WP:SYSTEMIC bias that we'll never hope to upend. Elizium23 (talk) 04:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Benda (naval officer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Benda (naval officer) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of History of Dedham, Massachusetts, in television and film for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of Dedham, Massachusetts, in television and film is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Dedham, Massachusetts, in television and film until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:36, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Dedham pre 1775.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Joseph Connolly (Massachusetts) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Connolly (Massachusetts) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Connolly (Massachusetts) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPL93 (talk) 21:04, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Charles W. Smith for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles W. Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles W. Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 05:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Eleanor Coe Sinnott for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eleanor Coe Sinnott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanor Coe Sinnott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:11, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Category:Activists from Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for merging
Category:Activists from Dedham, Massachusetts, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 19:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Category:Scientists from Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for merging
Category:Scientists from Dedham, Massachusetts, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 19:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Category:Athletes from Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for renaming
Category:Athletes from Dedham, Massachusetts, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 19:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Category:Cultivars originating in Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for merging
Category:Cultivars originating in Dedham, Massachusetts, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 19:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Stop the Church
I would advise you to retract the statement you made "Contaldo, as another editor pointed out to you just 48 hours ago, you have been editing long enough to know the rules" or I will make a formal complaint. This comment was made by another editor, and not an administrator. And it was in relation to a discussion with which you have not been involved. It bears no relevance to the discussion under Stop the Church. You have used it to try to humiliate and belittle me. Contaldo80 (talk) 04:45, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Contaldo80, I am sorry if you feel that you were humiliated or belittled. That certainly was not my intention. If editing here provokes such an emotional reaction, as apparently it does, then perhaps you may want to consider whether doing so is in the best interest of your mental heath. -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 15:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- It is your behaviour alone that disappoints me. I asked you to retract the statement you made and I will make a formal complaint if you do not. It was not relevant to the discussion in hand, and served the purpose to try to humiliate me. Why are you pointing to my separate discussions on one of the administration boards to refer to my "emotional response"?! Just what are you playing it? I advise you to make a real effort to observe absolute neutrality in your edits. If you can honestly say to yourself that you are not making an edit that is motivated by a defence of the Roman Catholic Church then you will have proved yourself worthy of editing on wikipedia. If, on the other hand, you are here simply to edit articles so they look good for this organisation and its associated parts then you really have no business in editing and may want to follow the lead of Elizium23 seeing as you seem so interested in that debate. Contaldo80 (talk) 05:12, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Andrea Harrington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea Harrington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Harrington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Debra Shopteese for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Debra Shopteese is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Shopteese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Aaron Hernandez
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aaron Hernandez you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 14:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Category:Judges from Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for merging
Category:Judges from Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:56, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Fed up
I'm really fed up with you Slugger. You are possessive and you are biased. I think your bias towards Catholicism is a disgrace to the ethos and founding principles of wikipedia. I'm not going to constantly battle over every single edit as it's soul-destroying (thankfully I don't believe in souls). But you really need to look inwards and think carefully about why you are here and why you are editing. Are you interested in improving the sum of human knowledge or are you determined to present a particular narrative. You have a long way to go in my opinion if you want to demonstrate the former and not the latter. I have worked with many editors over the years, and I can honestly say that I have found working with you to be the worst experience. So kudos on that. Contaldo80 (talk) 02:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Contaldo80 Sounds like you're the different side of the same coin for atheism. You're acting like a manchild over Slugger being in favor of a synonymous term that makes sense contextually. Drassow (talk) 05:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Contaldo80, I am very sorry you feel that way. Truly. I've said before that if editing with those who disagree with you provokes such a strong emotional reaction then perhaps you should consider whether it is in your best interest to do so. Someday I hope you can do so without getting so upset or so personally involved. -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 02:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
hint
Please be cautious about including "philanthropist" in the lede, unless there's really something major. A number of NPP editors have begun to use it as an indication of likely promotionalism. DGG ( talk ) 22:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
- DGG, Thanks for the hint. That's how most of the sources described him. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 23:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
For your clean up on Marvin Heermeyer. Funny, from your editing you don't seem drunk as a rule. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC) |
Women in Red
Hi there, Slugger O'Toole, and thanks for creating 14 articles about women as noted on the new WiR box on your user page. In order to be an "official" member, you should now register on the main Women in Red page. Keep up the good work!--Ipigott (talk) 08:09, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- Good to see you are now a full member and that you have already contributed 14 articles about women. I hope you'll be adding many more. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
|
Thanks for editing WP and creating marvelous articles. WikiAviator (talk) 04:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC) |
- Thanks, WikiAviator! I don't do it for the recognition, but it's nice to receive anyway. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 04:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Category:Members of the Massachusetts House of Representatives from Dedham has been nominated for merging
Category:Members of the Massachusetts House of Representatives from Dedham has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 15:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Aaron Hernandez
The article Aaron Hernandez you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Aaron Hernandez for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 10:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Admin board
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Category:Jurists from Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for deletion
Category:Jurists from Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:54, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Aaron Hernandez
The article Aaron Hernandez you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Aaron Hernandez for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 20:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
File:Sacco vanzetti dedham courthouse.gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sacco vanzetti dedham courthouse.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 02:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Moving my comments
why are you moving my comments to a different talkpage. Who is briancua 1AlmostFrancis (talk) 04:18, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Is CUA for Catholic University of America and do you have a conflict due to a relationship with the university?AlmostFrancis (talk) 04:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- AlmostFrancis, briancua was my former username. I had it changed several years ago to avoid confusion about potential COI. I didn't realize the new automated talk page archiver was using that name to archive my old discussions. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'll see if I can fix it. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Fair enough but you should probably take your alma mater off of your watchlist and leave it to others to edit. AlmostFrancis (talk) 04:29, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- AlmostFrancis, briancua was my former username. I had it changed several years ago to avoid confusion about potential COI. I didn't realize the new automated talk page archiver was using that name to archive my old discussions. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'll see if I can fix it. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Massachusetts General Court session article names
Thanks for your input on this topic at User talk:M2545. I've moved the conversation, including your comments so far, to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Massachusetts#Massachusetts General Court session article names. Hope to see you there! ``` t b w i l l i e ` $1.25 ` 02:32, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Toll Booth Willie, Thanks! That'll be a dollar twenty five, pop! -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Content sourced to Catholic Priests
Are you aware that all the sourcing you just added to the HV article was from a liberation theology publisher, a mixture of religions and Marxism, and was written by two Catholic priests.AlmostFrancis (talk) 06:03, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- AlmostFrancis, This type of discussion is best held on the article talk page. I will respond there. -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Advice regarding chronic issues
RE Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Years of incivility: I agree with the close that this issue is "stale", but this brings the problem that any current issue is just a "one-off incident" which is discussed and resolved, but the long-term pattern is not considered or acted on. Administrators' noticeboard is generally considered a poor venue for resolving issues like this, although it is an essential part of dispute resolution. The current ArbCom has shown signs of willing to take chronic incivility seriously. Honestly, you should have probably requested arbitration after those three initial AN/I threads which included the religious personal attack and the serious case of rev-deleting one's own edit. I am uncertain if a case would be accepted now, without further developments (perhaps inclining to not), but you shouldn't be afraid to try that if there are sound reasons. --Pudeo (talk) 08:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- I second Pudeo's advice. Jusdafax (talk) 09:59, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Jusdafax and Pudeo, Thank you for the advice. I spend the vast, vast majority of my time here creating articles and adding content. I don't spend any time on noticeboards unless I am directly involved in an issue. As a result, I am only vaguely aware of what ArbCom does and completely unfamiliar with how they operate. If you think it is worth filing a case and are willing to take the lead, I would support you in any way I could. Or, perhaps, we could collaborate together to file one. I am really not sure what the best course of action is here. -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- ArbCom is time-intensive, no doubt about that, and partly because of that I've never filed a case there. I would hesitate to start one without devoting considerable study first. You need to know how to do it right, and have a strong case. You do have the option of contacting ArbCom by email. In my view, Pudeo's last sentence is a good summation. Jusdafax (talk) 14:05, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Arbitration Case Request
Hello I'm Cameron11598 and I am a clerk for the arbitration committee. I recently removed some comments you made from the case request you recently filed, as they seemed to be a personal attack. Please keep in mind that all editors are required to act reasonably, civilly, and with decorum on arbitration pages, and may face sanctions if they fail to do so. I am also required by our procedures to warn you that arbitration clerks are authorized by the arbitration policy and ArbCom precedent to sanction users for conduct on arbitration pages, including by blocks and topic bans from Arbitration Committee pages. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 17:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benjamin Bussey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hessian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
JzG case request declined
The case request "JzG" that you are a party to has been declined by the committee after a absolute majority of arbitrators voted to decline the case request. The case request has been removed from Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case. A permanent link to the declined case can be accessed through this wikilink.
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
I've nominated Käte Frankenthal for DYK
Hi. I've nominated your article at DYK. You can see the nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Käte Frankenthal.
The nomination has run into a concern with close paraphrasing. Can you please take a look and address those concerns?
Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Seaport District has been nominated for deletion
Category:Seaport District has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Please undo the archiving
Please undo the archiving you performed. I believe it gives a skewed view of the conversation and forces me to repeat points I have already made to you. AlmostFrancis (talk) 18:55, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- AlmostFrancis, Could you be a little more specific? I only archived conversations that have gone dormant for a month or more. I also left some that have not had any further commentary in more than a month but are directly relevant to other conversations (e.g. RfCs). If you tell me which you would like restored, I'd be glad to do it. Alternatively, you can restore any of them yourself if you want to continue a line of discussion. I think the real solution here is to set it up so that the archiving is done automatically. I'll work on that. -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 18:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- You archived two sections about sectioning right around the time you asked a question that had been answered ad nauseum. Is this your statement that you will not undue the archiving?AlmostFrancis (talk) 00:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- AlmostFrancis, No. That is not what my statement said at all. In fact, I said the exact opposite. However, I don't think it benefits anyone to have 40 dormant sections on the talk page. Again, if you tell me what sections you would like un-archived, I would be glad to do it. I also encourage you to be bold and do it yourself. -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- You archived two sections about sectioning right around the time you asked a question that had been answered ad nauseum. Is this your statement that you will not undue the archiving?AlmostFrancis (talk) 00:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Daniel Slattery house for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Slattery house is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Slattery house until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Can you confirm if this house is a contributing property to Dedham Village Historic District, the boundaries which appear encompass it?Djflem (talk) 19:46, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Archiving note
Whenever you archive something using OneClickArchiver, it gets archived to User talk:Briancua 1. I'm assuming this is unintentional? Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 18:38, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Moneytrees, It is unintentional, but I am not sure how to fix it. Do you? -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yep, I’ve fixed it. I archived the thank you post to test it out and it went to the right place. I’ll move the Braincua1 talk page to your 8th archive. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 13:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Moneytrees, Terrific. Thanks! I've noticed the same problem at Catholic Church and HIV/AIDS. Think you could work your magic there? -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- I looked into it, it seems like an issue with the OneClickArchiver; It doesn't count "Aids" as part of the title due to the slash. I'm not sure how to fix that issue, so I just decided to move the contents of the malformed archive to the correct one. My advice would be not to use OCA on that page; I would suggest going to the script creator, but they've been arb banned. There's some stalkers on the scripts talk page though, so maybe dropping a note there will be useful. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 21:17, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Moneytrees, Terrific. Thanks! I've noticed the same problem at Catholic Church and HIV/AIDS. Think you could work your magic there? -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yep, I’ve fixed it. I archived the thank you post to test it out and it went to the right place. I’ll move the Braincua1 talk page to your 8th archive. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 13:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
John F. Schwegmann moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, John F. Schwegmann, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 06:22, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Slugger O'Toole! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
August 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Help requested
I was wondering if you could help out with your feedback on this please: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bochasanwasi_Akshar_Purushottam_Swaminarayan_Sanstha#WP:OR,_Recent_Lead_Paragraph_Edits_to_state_Founder_Left_the_Vadtal_Temple
Applebutter221 (talk) 21:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Käte Frankenthal
On 18 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Käte Frankenthal, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that since the German army did not accept female doctors, Käte Frankenthal served in the Austrian army during World War I, and was the only woman in her barracks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Käte Frankenthal. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Käte Frankenthal), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Precious
women
Thank you for quality articles, around Dedham, Mass., such as Avery Oak, knights such as Edward L. Hearn, and turning women from red to blue, such as Antonella Barba, Glendora Putnam and Käte Frankenthal, for gnomish improvements, for a concept in contentious areas, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2434 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
September Women in Red edithons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Margaret M. McChesney
Hello, Slugger O'Toole. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Margaret M. McChesney".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Missing cite in History of Dedham, Massachusetts, 1700-1799
The article cites "Simon 2003" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 14:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
November edith-a-thons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for November 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William B. Gould I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Missing cite in Baker v. Fales
The article cites "Worthington 1936" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 03:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Also "Gates 2010" in Harvard Extension School back from July 2013. Renata (talk) 03:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
I went thru some of your contributions and found more pages with missing citations:
- Alvan_Lamson -- Robinson 1985
- Charitable_activities_of_the_Knights_of_Columbus -- Scott 1919
- Henry_Bradford_Endicott -- Slafter 1889
- History_of_the_Knights_of_Columbus -- Skocpol 1999 and Meyer 1976
- HIV/AIDS_in_the_United_States -- Kasza 2007
If you are topic-banned from any of these articles, please ping me -- I will add the cites for you. Thanks, Renata (talk) 06:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Renata3, I have fixed the problems are Baker v Fales, Alvan Lamson, HB Endicott, and AIDS in the US. Assistance with the others would be appreciated. -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 17:11, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- what are the full citations for the 2 other articles? Can you post them here? Renata (talk) 01:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Renata3, here you go:
-
- Scott, Emmett J. (1919). Scott's Official History of the American Negro in the World War. Chicago: Homewood Press. Retrieved 17 August 2018.
-
- Meyer, Jean (1976). The Cristero Rebellion: The Mexican People between Church and State, 1926–1929. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- The Skocpol 1999 should actually be the Skocpal 2004 citation. Looks like I messed up the year. Thanks for your help. -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 01:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- what are the full citations for the 2 other articles? Can you post them here? Renata (talk) 01:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
A New Year With Women in Red!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:John F. Schwegmann
Hello, Slugger O'Toole. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John F. Schwegmann".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I created this article on a descendant of Jonathan Fairbanks. I have nominated it for Good Article. Take a look. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article John Farrington (Massachusetts colonist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Verifiable as having existed and led a worthy life, in local history and family genealogy sources ... but the same could be said for countless individuals. There appears to be no reason for an international encyclopedia to have an article about this person.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 08:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Hallo, Although I have my doubts about the encyclopedic value of John Farrington (Massachusetts colonist), I'll add a message I regularly post:
When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie John Farrington), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 10:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- PamD, Thanks. It obviously was an oversight, but I appreciate you fixing it for me. -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 15:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nathan Aldis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joshua Fisher.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joshua Fisher (Massachusetts politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freeman.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for May 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allin Congregational Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albion, New York.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baker v. Fales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joshua Bates.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
""Francis Chickering"" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect "Francis Chickering". The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 26#"Francis Chickering" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Jabez Chickering (minister) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabez Chickering (minister) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
DGG ( talk ) 08:50, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for June 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Dedham, Massachusetts, 1800–1899, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bicentennial.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
August Editathons with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary
| |
| One year! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Pomham for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pomham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Onel5969 TT me 02:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Samuel Man for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Onel5969 TT me 02:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Samuel Hunting moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Samuel Hunting, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 02:51, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Emma E. Brigham moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Emma E. Brigham, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 18:44, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Onel5969, Does someone who served in a state legislature not have presumed notability per NPOL, even if there is only one source for the article? -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:32, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
History of Dedham, Massachussetts
Hey there, I switched the categories you added on the "History of Dedham, Massachussetts" articles from "XX00s in Massachussetts" to "nth century in Massachussetts". As others have noted in your CFD, the "xx00s in Massachussetts" is for categorization by decade (e.g. xx10s, xx20s, etc.), while "nth century" is for categorization by century. bibliomaniac15 05:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
October 2021 at Women in Red
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Philip E. Young moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Philip E. Young, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 18:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Hunting has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 05:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)November 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Great work at Fisher-Whiting House. - Hatchens (talk) 13:49, 7 November 2021 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2022 Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Paul R. Devin for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul R. Devin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Clarityfiend (talk) 23:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red
Thanks, Slugger O'Toole, for all the biographies of women you have created since you joined the project a couple of years ago. Keep up the good work!--Ipigott (talk) 07:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2022 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Genevra R. Counihan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Genevra R. Counihan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. New articles generally need at least two (but preferably more) references from reliable sources that are independent of the subject that discuss the subject with significant coverage (trivial mentions do not contribute to notability).(See Rule 42) Information that can't be referenced to reliable sources should be removed from the draft because verifiability is necessary for information added to Wikipedia.
I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on the article with minimal disruption from other users while you improve it.
When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready to be published, you can move it back to the article space yourself. However, I recommend that instead of moving it yourself that you follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template that I have added to the page. This submits the article to be reviewed by experienced editors that specialize in helping new editors write their first articles. — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here)(or here)(or here) 20:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Slugger O'Toole
Thank you for creating Genevra R. Counihan.
User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Surely you can do better? Why is an editor with your tenure submitting single source stubs? Articles require at least two high quality independent sources.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
— Insertcleverphrasehere(or here)(or here)(or here) 20:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Insertcleverphrasehere, For the last several years, my main focus has been on Women in Red. I found a list of every female state legislator in Massachusetts, the single source used is this article. I've created dozens of stub articles using it all following the template in my sandbox, and none have been moved to draft before. That single source has always been enough to demonstrate that the article passes GNG. I don't have time to give them all the full treatment I would like, so I figured a stub was better than nothing. If my understanding is wrong, I would appreciate being set right.
- I've also found a few new sources for this particular article, though, as I suspected it would be for a two-term backbencher, coverage is light. I submitted the draft for review. If you would be kind enough to give it another look I would be obliged. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding additional sources. Note that a single source is never enough to demonstrate meeting the GNG. The GNG requires multiple independent and reliable sources that show significant coverage. I guess the issue is that stubs on rarely visited pages like this rarely get significant future improvement, so it is important to be meeting at least the bare minimum of our sourcing requirements. It seems that someone else has already accepted it, but I would have happily done it myself. Nice work. — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here)(or here)(or here) 06:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks...
It's been a while since I felt inspired to do any real research or content creation and I found some great stuff on Mary H. Goode that i'm working on incorporating into the article. I've never done a DYK before but I think we totally could with this one! PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:28, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- That's great! If I can be of help please let me know. I really enjoy the research and content creation aspects of the project, but don't have the time to do much of it these days. So, instead, I am working on making women blue with templated stubs. The hope is that someone will come along and expand them, like you are! Thanks again for the kind words and for your contributions. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 01:33, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Unexplained addition of disgusting religious propaganda on the article HIV/AIDS in the United States
Hello, I'm GenoV84. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to HIV/AIDS in the United States seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising, and showcasing. This applies to usernames, articles, drafts, categories, files, talk page discussions, templates, and user pages. GenoV84 (talk) 20:55, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- I haven't edited that article in two years, so I'm not sure to which "recent edit" you are referring. If you can be a little more specific, I would be glad to try and rectify it. If you would rather I stay out and let the community work on it instead, I'd be glad to do that as well. I don't have the time for content disputes or inclination to engage in edit wars, but also don't want a problem to persist if I have the power to fix it. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 01:28, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- The edit is this ([1]); I already fixed it. GenoV84 (talk) 02:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- The edit is Slugger fixing a ref, @GenoV84? PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- No @Praxidicae, the edit is Slugger adding a self-published religious book which has absolutely nothing to do with the subject of this article, the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the United States, without explanation or justification. GenoV84 (talk) 13:30, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- I am glad you fixed it to your satisfaction, Geno. I'll considered this resolved. However, I might suggest you reconsider using phrases such as "disgusting religious propaganda." I don't find the hyperbolic tone to be helpful. Additionally, the edit in question was two years ago, so again I'll note that it was not "recent." Glad it all worked out. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 16:07, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- No @Praxidicae, the edit is Slugger adding a self-published religious book which has absolutely nothing to do with the subject of this article, the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the United States, without explanation or justification. GenoV84 (talk) 13:30, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- The edit is Slugger fixing a ref, @GenoV84? PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- The edit is this ([1]); I already fixed it. GenoV84 (talk) 02:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I'm having a hard time adding content to this article with reliable refs. What do you think about the future of this article? Do you think it can reach WP:GNG? I can do some more deep digging, but so far I'm falling short. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 12:19, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- A quick search on my end doesn't turn up much else either. At this time, I don't think it reaches GNG and I don't see how it could get there, at least not with the tools available to me. Thanks for the flag, and good luck! --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 16:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Ellis Flynn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
After searching Newspapers.com, Newspaperarchive.com and Google Books, there does not appear to be adequate reliable sources to add enough content to reach WP:GNG. If someone can find additional sources, please remove this tag.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FieldMarine (talk) 19:45, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Category:Parks and outdoor spaces in Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for renaming
Category:Parks and outdoor spaces in Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 19:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)