User talk:Sonnenrage

July 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Germanic peoples—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 12:22, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. As far as I can see, one can adapt science and history to one's ideology. You changed the word ethnicity to tribe.

Do European ethnic groups no longer exist? First news. Sonnenrage (talk) 12:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is doing its utmost to destroy the history of white people little by little. Like when you transform your articles on Indo-European Asian cultures. You are criminal, traitor, enemy. You are worthless as a human being.

You think you are a defender of culture? But you are ready to destroy everything that doesn't go your way. You are a liar. Deceiver. You are an enemy of freedom and truth. Oppressor.

Karma will catch up with you, don't doubt it. Sonnenrage (talk) 12:32, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Sonnenrage, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Austronesier (talk) 14:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Germanic peoples shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Austronesier (talk) 14:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Austronesier (talk) 14:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per these comments: "You are criminal, traitor, enemy. You are worthless as a human being." If you can't communicate in a civil manner you may not belong on Wikipedia. A complaint about your edits was filed on my user talk. EdJohnston (talk) 02:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]