User talk:Soorie18

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Soorie18, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tambireddy Surendra Reddy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 14:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tambireddy Surendra Reddy[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tambireddy Surendra Reddy, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 14:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the guidelines again to understand why the page was deleted. Deb (talk) 15:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page[edit]

Your user page is not for article drafts. I have moved it to User:Soorie18/Surendrareddy. -- Whpq (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boothsift was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of your sources are credible/reliable and are therefore ineligible. A majority of them are Wikipedia, IMDB(or IMDB-like websites), and review sites that praise him and his work. Find more neutral resources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Soorie18/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Soorie18/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The One and Only Boothsift 18:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Soorie18! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The One and Only Boothsift 18:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete sentences[edit]

Hi there, please don't use incomplete sentences when you add content, like here. Something like "T. Surendra Reddy was the film's cinematographer." or "The film's cinematography was performed by T. Surendra Reddy." would be more appropriate. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chota K. Naidu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bobby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chota K. Naidu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anji (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edits[edit]

In these three edits, you incorrectly removed proper formatting around the film's title in the lead, you introduced a mistake in the spicyonion.com url, and you added post-nomials at the end of Chota K. Naidu's name, which we do not do in film articles. Please be more careful in the future. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Soorie18/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Soorie18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Soorie18/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of T. Surendra Reddy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article T. Surendra Reddy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. Surendra Reddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 04:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]