User talk:Soumyadeep980

October 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Johannnes89. I noticed that in this edit to Islam in Cambodia, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Johannnes89 (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Islam in Cambodia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:49, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Cham, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Uanfala (talk) 03:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Omaha Beach, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 21:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Member states of the Commonwealth of Nations, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Omaha Beach. DrKay (talk) 21:56, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 22:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Normandy landings has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Soumyadeep980! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Note that your edits at Sita Ramachandraswamy temple, Bhadrachalam, Sitaram Bagh temple, Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala and Member states of the Commonwealth of Nations are not minor. DrKay (talk) 14:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages[edit]

Hello, I'm DrKay. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Wapenß that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines for appropriate talk page behavior. DrKay (talk) 22:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 14:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Do not remove sourced content Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 20:45, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]