User talk:SounderBruce/Archive 34

This is an archive of past discussions with SounderBruce. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

< Archive 33

Archive 34

Archive 35 >

All Pages:

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - ... (up to 100)

DYK for Girmay Zahilay

On 3 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Girmay Zahilay, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Girmay Zahilay defeated a six-term incumbent on Seattle's King County Council? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Girmay Zahilay. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Girmay Zahilay), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Icicle Station

On 4 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Icicle Station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after regular service to Leavenworth station ceased, annual trains continued to run to serve ski jumping spectators? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Icicle Station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Icicle Station), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2019 U.S. Open Cup Final

The article 2019 U.S. Open Cup Final you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2019 U.S. Open Cup Final for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:42, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2019 U.S. Open Cup Final

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2019 U.S. Open Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 05:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

response

I thought it wasnt relevant anymore given that it had a floor vote, but i see why its important to keep that in there. i fixed the quality issues only and left descriptions too. anyways, this bill is dead, so it's probably going to look like that for a long time, so maybe reconsider the quality tag up top? cheersQwertyuiop1234567898 (talk) 07:12, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Washington State Route 4 Revisions

My edit today was to clarify that, although State Route 4 is often referred to as The Ocean Beach Highway (and some maps indicate it as such for much of its length), it is only officially named Ocean Beach Highway, and signed as such, in Cowlitz County from the Wahkiakum County line to the point where State Route 4 turns on to Cowlitz Way on the border of Longview and Kelso. Addresses of residences and businesses reflect this... Wahkiakum County uses State Route 4, while Cowlitz County uses Ocean Beach Highway. Your revision is acceptable to me though as "also known as the Ocean Beach Highway" is more accurate than "officially known as the Ocean Beach Highway" in this case. It's a simpler edit and it works. Cascade1988 (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Cascade1988[reply]

@Cascade1988: You must cite a reliable source when changing content. Addresses are not a reliable source, but local newspapers and state-produced maps are. The text has been changed to remove the "official" bit, but the name remains commonly applied for the entire highway when looking at published reliable sources. Sounder Bruce 06:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce: Going along with your mention of local newspapers (which I agree with), there have been a few recent news articles in The Daily News regarding a landslide which has closed State Route 4 west of Cathlamet. The Daily News has been consistent with this, and other articles over the years, in referring to this portion of the highway as State Route 4 or simply SR4 and not as Ocean Beach Highway. I did not include this as a reference as I felt it was irrelevant to the article, however it was a factor in my edit. Cascade1988 (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Cascade1988[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

The Emerald (building) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Penthouse

Washington State Route 141 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Washington State Route 12

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of my edits to article Atlantic, Seattle

Hi SounderBruce! You reverted my edits to the article for which I created sections and removed text relating to Judkins Park. The creations of section was I confess loosely considered. However, I looked up the Washington city website and according to it, Judkins park is not a rectangular in Atlantic (as stated in the article) but another neighborhood in Seattle. Thus Its description in the article was out of topic. And hence I removed it. What do you think? DishitaBhowmik 16:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dishita Bhowmik (talk • contribs)

@Dishita Bhowmik: The Judkins Park content was merged into the Atlantic article quite a long time ago and there isn't enough for either to survive as a standalone article. Your edit deleted the Judkins Park content and introduced very short sections. Seattle does not have official neighborhood boundaries (the maps are only suggestions and are nonbinding), so this should not be taken as "out of topic" because of the overlap. Sounder Bruce 20:39, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce:Thanks for clearing up. DishitaBhowmik 10:36, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Third and Lenora

On 13 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Third and Lenora, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Seattle high-rise building Third and Lenora lost its main tenant, WeWork, before it was completed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Third and Lenora. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Third and Lenora), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Seattle-Tacoma Airport

Discussed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports/Archive_14#New_Routes/Services:_Exact_date_issue. 172.223.6.230 (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Columbia Station (Washington)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Columbia Station (Washington) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dishita Bhowmik -- Dishita Bhowmik (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Washington State Fire Training Academy

On 16 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Washington State Fire Training Academy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a fire training academy in the state of Washington has been designated as a quarantine site during the current coronavirus outbreak? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Washington State Fire Training Academy. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Washington State Fire Training Academy), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wagner Houseboat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cable car (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision to Chehalis, Washington photos?

Hey SounderBruce,

Glad to be a proud resident of Lewis County and Chehalis, wanting to inform and promote my city for the masses...did I miss something wrong with the photos I added?

Can you explain how the photos were unnecessary? If I messed up in how I posted, please let me know!

Thanks!

Shortiefourten — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shortiefourten (talk • contribs) 19:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shortiefourten, your photo gallery was removed because it does not comply with WP:GALLERY, the policy on using gallery sections in articles. A random assortment of pictures from Chehalis is not an appropriate use, but a selection of pictures depicting registered historic landmarks would be. Your other edits were previously reverted for adding content without adequate citations. Sounder Bruce 00:03, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

University of Washington station

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for March 19, 2020. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 19, 2020.—Wehwalt (talk) 19:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wehwalt: Could this TFA be pulled? I was hoping to run it on March 19, 2021, which is the 5th anniversary and also could be close to the date that a new line extension from the station is set to open. Sounder Bruce 00:01, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK. After I finish scheduling the month, I'll come back to this. Is there one that's ready to go that you'd be OK with running?--Wehwalt (talk) 00:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just asking again on this. Trying to keep the categories balanced.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wehwalt: Sorry that I didn't see this earlier. Given that there are major changes afoot for light rail in Seattle next month (including a name change for the line, which will affect all articles and the blurb), I would rather not have UW Station or Tukwila International Boulevard station run if possible. I'm not sure if any of the other trains-related FAs would be more appropriate for this slot. Sounder Bruce 23:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. I'll look later on in the day so I can put March to bed.--Wehwalt (talk) 09:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Service Date Format

Good day. Per your request:

Under "Body"; note 11. Perhaps I should have used the term "full date" as stated in the article. Shakbok (talk) 16:37, 19 February 2020 (UTC)shakbok[reply]

Saratoga and Washington Railroad

I added some paragraphs to Saratoga and Washington Railroad and took the prod tag off. Happily I had Shaughnessy on the shelf, and I've done a little work on D&H predecessors before. Best, Mackensen (talk) 12:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Flag of Spokane, Washington

On 23 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Flag of Spokane, Washington, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the flag of Spokane, Washington (pictured), was taken to the summit of Mount Everest in 1981? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Flag of Spokane, Washington. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Flag of Spokane, Washington), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Wug·a·po·des 03:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 00:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for making science journalist Sandi Doughton. I looked her up, read her recent article on HVTN 702, then started that article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Centralia, Washington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chehalis River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pages Draft:National Youth Liberation and Youth rights

Regrettably, the latest edits of pages Draft:National Youth Liberation and Youth rights are so very different that I see no sign that a single complete cut-and-paste event happened between them. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bellevue 600

On 1 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bellevue 600, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Amazon plans to build its tallest office tower in the Bellevue suburb of Seattle, Washington? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bellevue 600. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bellevue 600), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 00:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2020 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing Cactus wren to featured article status.
The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included L293D, Kingsif, Enwebb, Lee Vilenski and CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for bothering you, but...

New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers

New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions and review our instructions page. You can apply for the user-right HERE. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 21:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup newsletter correction

There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for North Transfer Station

On 4 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article North Transfer Station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that North Seattle's waste transfer station has a viewing room and a playground? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/North Transfer Station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, North Transfer Station), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 00:03, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2019 U.S. Open Cup Final

The article 2019 U.S. Open Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2019 U.S. Open Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of North Transfer Station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article North Transfer Station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 01:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Columbia Station (Washington)

The article Columbia Station (Washington) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Columbia Station (Washington) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dishita Bhowmik -- Dishita Bhowmik (talk) 14:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Monorail pictures

My compliments on your excellent work expanding Seattle Center Monorail. Do you think the inclusion of a photo of the temporary terminal that was in use for a year and a half starting in September 1986 is justified? I may have gotten one, but I have not yet checked my slides for that. By the way, now that you are going for GA, I think you need to add one photo of the interior (passenger area) of a train; Commons already has a few, though none is very good. I might have a better one, but not sure. I see you added something about the "red train" becoming the "green train", which is especially welcome in light of my recent addition of a (1982) photo of the latter. I hope you can find the approximate date that it went back to being red, although it's probably not essential. Do you plan to add anything on advertising paint schemes/wraps? That, too, is not really essential (might even be considered trivial), but the first one – at least I think it was the first (but I have no source for that) – lasted for many months, maybe a year or more, in 1984. It was a combination of paint (all-over black) and decals (Chinese dragon) advertising a Chinese exhibition at the Pacific Science Center and its main sponsor, Northwest Orient Airlines. I've already scanned a slide, which I am considering uploading. SJ Morg (talk) 07:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SJ Morg: Thanks for adding your photo of the original terminal in its last days (and the brief existence of the green train). I do think that a picture of the temporary terminal would be handy, as it could be displayed with {{multiple image}} alongside comparison shots of the two other iterations of the Westlake terminal. I'll be working on getting a good interior shot (either from my own un-uploaded library or taking fresh pictures). At the moment, I don't think I will be able to reliably source the various ad wraps, though I have seen passing mentions of the Northwest campaign in The Times; if I find a good source for the first wraps (which must have been quite a shock), then I'll add it in. Sounder Bruce 07:49, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I did find a couple of slides I took of the temporary terminal at Stewart Street. I'll scan and upload one soon. SJ Morg (talk) 08:29, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Icicle Station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Icicle Station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 23:41, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Icicle Station

The article Icicle Station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Icicle Station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of North Transfer Station

The article North Transfer Station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:North Transfer Station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 03:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 141

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 141 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Monroe, Washington

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Monroe, Washington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of John M Wolfson -- John M Wolfson (talk) 03:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Monroe, Washington

The article Monroe, Washington you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Monroe, Washington for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of John M Wolfson -- John M Wolfson (talk) 04:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 141

The article Washington State Route 141 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 141 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Seattle Center Monorail

Hello! Your submission of Seattle Center Monorail at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 01:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Seattle Center Monorail

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Seattle Center Monorail you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jasper Deng -- Jasper Deng (talk) 08:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Seattle Center Monorail

On 24 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Seattle Center Monorail, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Seattle Center Monorail began operating 58 years ago today and still uses its original trains (example pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Seattle Center Monorail. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Seattle Center Monorail), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 00:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Seattle Center Monorail

The article Seattle Center Monorail you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Seattle Center Monorail for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jasper Deng -- Jasper Deng (talk) 02:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everett, Washington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hat Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Under what section should I post my edits / is a new heading/section needed?

Hello Sounderbruce, This is cleo.the.great, a fellow wikipedian. I am here to ask your advice on how to proceed with my edits on Lime (transportation company)

I wanted to post information on restrictions on Lime in the Tel Aviv location. You took them down, claiming it belongs in "an article about the 'locality'". What do you mean by this? Does this belong in a sub heading that already exists or is a new one needed?

What do you suggest?

Thanks Cleo.the.great (talk) 18:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cleo.the.great, information about scooter regulations for a local area (in this case, Tel Aviv) should not be added to pages about international companies. Instead, it belongs in an article specifically about the local area (e.g. Transportation in Tel Aviv). If we added specific regulations for every city that Lime serves, the page would be very long and cumbersome to read. Sounder Bruce 18:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for National Archives at Seattle

On 25 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article National Archives at Seattle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that records from the National Archives at Seattle are planned to be moved to California and to Kansas City, Missouri? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/National Archives at Seattle. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, National Archives at Seattle), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notability for Peoples National Bank robbery

I see you just added Template:Notability to the article. Please see Talk:Peoples National Bank robbery for discussion. I’d like to know what criteria this case would have to meet to establish notability. --Michael-stanton (talk) 22:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of MLS Cup 2019

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article MLS Cup 2019 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of MLS Cup 2019

The article MLS Cup 2019 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:MLS Cup 2019 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of MLS Cup 2019

The article MLS Cup 2019 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:MLS Cup 2019 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please Clarify

I'm having some trouble with the issues you cited on the page I'm working on, can you please clarify the issues you perceive? In the article The Green Rush trying to write an article to help people understand what specifically makes up Cannabis Industry right now. Any notes at all would be helpful. Jzesbaugh (talk) 02:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jzesbaugh: I recommend getting someone knowledgeable about the subject and Wikipedia guidelines to help with rewriting the entry, as it reads too much like a promotional piece for the cannabis industry. You will need to bring in more than just the U.S./Canada unless you intend to make this only about those two countries. The article itself should also be moved to an appropriate title (Green rush or Growth of the cannabis industry in North America) or merged into an appropriate existing article. You also need to improve the citations, preferably using the Citation Style 1 series of templates instead of bare links. Sounder Bruce 04:06, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to Green rush as suggested and did some style cleanup. I agree with SounderBruce that there are still tone issues. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1994 FIFA World Cup

Hello I have just seen your message on my talk page so came here to discuss the matter of the 1994 World Cup page. I feel that my version gives a more accurate representation of the host cities and what they were known as at the time during the tournament. I also feel as though the images I used are a lot better and more consistent. I just wondered if there is any evidence to support the host cities being called what they are on the current version? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hans23019 (talk • contribs) 09:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hans23019, You should post your proposal at Talk:1994 FIFA World Cup first and take feedback before changing the table, which is a major element of the page. Your other table edits to 1999 FIFA Women's World Cup should not have been done, as it is a reviewed FA and needs to maintain its quality. Sounder Bruce 20:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Seattle City Council election, 2019

Hello, SounderBruce. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seattle City Council election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everett, Washington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saloon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]