User talk:Sphilbrick/Archive 125
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Sphilbrick. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 120 | ← | Archive 123 | Archive 124 | Archive 125 | Archive 126 | Archive 127 | → | Archive 130 |
November 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – November 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.
Technical news
- Toolhub is a catalogue of tools which can be used on Wikimedia wikis. It is at https://toolhub.wikimedia.org/.
Arbitration
- GeneralNotability, Mz7 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections. Ivanvector and John M Wolfson are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves to stand in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections from 07 November 2021 until 16 November 2021.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of five new CheckUsers and two new Oversighters.
Nomination for deletion of Template:Ohio NNLs map
Template:Ohio NNLs map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:21, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Nathan Edmondson
Hi. My attempts to get others to help regarding an editor blanking content from the Nathan Edmondson article, and refusing to discuss the matter, have only been slightly successful. I've contacted three other admins, and put messages on the WikiComics Project talk page, and only two other editors have so far responded. Since you've participated in disputes regarding comics articles before, can you offer your views in the discussions? My analysis of the blanking, which I did at the request of another editor who alerted me to the problem, is here. The subsequent RfC began here. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
|
Hope you are doing well and real life isn't too stressful. DanCherek (talk) 15:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC) |
Books & Bytes – Issue 47
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021
- On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
- Search tool deployed
- New My Library design improvements
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination for deletion of Template:UNDtest
Template:UNDtest has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
- The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).
- The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
- Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.
Arbitration
- Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.
Miscellaneous
- The functionaries email list (functionaries-en
lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Royal Indian Air Force
Can you please review the article on Royal Indian Air Force for any errors. Cookersweet (talk) 15:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Kbach
Hey there, as you allow for it, I am questioning your revert edit on my work in process on Kbach. It's a work in process, maybe it was too earlty to publicize as I am still working on the later parts and I have not yet finalized some quotes which, though they have footnotes, need to be adapted better to the article. I hope you are okay if I go on with my work to avoid a useless edit war. Blessings from Cambodia.Willuconquer (talk) 15:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- I don't engage in a edit wars. That said, while many edits might be open to discussion with regard to wording, structure, style and many other editorial issues, compliance with copyright rules is not one of those areas. I believe your edit was a violation of our copyright rules, if you disagree I'm happy to discuss.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- As a follow-up point, you said you were questioning my revert, but you didn't provide any hint as to why you disagree.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'm happy we are both peaceful about this. I agree in the current state, the page may have needed a edit revert. However, I did indicate that it was a work in progress. The references were provided to show I was not going on a "copycat" work. Many quotes were being considered for rewording and empty sections were going to be filled in. What I suggest is to under to reversion and let me one week to finish my work on this article and assess from there. Thanks for your help in making this article better. Willuconquer (talk) 12:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- In the very early days of Wikipedia (15 or so years ago), it was reasonably common for editors to create an article in place, and to add "under construction" graphics to let readers know that wasn't quite ready for prime time. That practice is largely discouraged today. While it is still true the many new articles start out small and grow organically over time, it is no longer considered acceptable to have an article in main space that isn't ready for readers. While this general change in practice occur quite a few years ago, the existence of draft space made it much easier to distinguish between articles that are ready for general viewing, and articles that are still in the early stages of development. However, even when it was acceptable practice to have an unfinished article in main space, it has never been acceptable to have copyright problems in any version, even in draft space. I have observed hundreds of editors who seem to think that it's okay to drop copyrighted or closely paraphrased text into an article as long as they clean it up in short order, but this is not the case. Some of them are unaware that all prior versions of articles are accessible, and we cannot have copyright problems in any version of any article. My revert had nothing to do with the fact that this article wasn't in polished shape, It was because your edit included material that was too close to a source.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'm happy we are both peaceful about this. I agree in the current state, the page may have needed a edit revert. However, I did indicate that it was a work in progress. The references were provided to show I was not going on a "copycat" work. Many quotes were being considered for rewording and empty sections were going to be filled in. What I suggest is to under to reversion and let me one week to finish my work on this article and assess from there. Thanks for your help in making this article better. Willuconquer (talk) 12:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 48
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021
- 1Lib1Ref 2022
- Wikipedia Library notifications deployed
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.
Technical news
- The user group
oversightwill be renamedsuppressin around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections. - The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.
- The user group
Arbitration
- Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
- The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
- A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging