User talk:SpokeFree

Welcome!

Hello, SpokeFree, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 03:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to AirAsia may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

In June 2015, [[CNBC]]<ref>{{cite web|title= Report alleges AirAsia needs to raise $1.9B|url=http://www.cnbc.com/2015/06/23/
airasia-report-revealed.html|publisher =CNBC|accessdate=12 August 2015</ref> and [[Reuters]]<ref>{{cite web|title= GMT Research report questions AirAsia accounting practices|url=http://www.reuters.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpokeFree (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a sock puppet

Decline reason:

Clearly either sockpuppetry or WP:MEATPUPPETRY. Both are detrimental to the project and blockable offenses. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:29, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This account (SpokeFree) appeared while another account (Jermzc) was blocked, largely for edit warring. SpokeFree's only editing was on the same article where Jermzc had been edit warring, plus one talk page post about that editing. The edits from SpokeFree were very similar in character to the editing of Jermzc, both of them working to add negative content about the subject of the article. I have searched extensively through the editing history of the article over the last few months, and I have not found even one instance of any similar editing except by SpokeFree, Jermzc, and one other account (Akeela16) already known to be a sockpuppet of Jermzc. SpokeFree started the first steps of an edit war on the article. A CheckUser has decided that the technical evidence makes a connection between the accounts somewhere between "possible" and "likely". There are rather a lot of coincidences there. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:10, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, everybody has been releasing negative info on this company. Half the market is short on this stock. Dropped more than 10% past 3 days. My info's all true though.