User talk:Spshu Stinks

March 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cartoon Network (UK & Ireland) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cartoon Network (UK & Ireland) was changed by Spshu Stinks (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.94776 on 2014-03-23T09:58:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:58, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:02, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hoax (TV channel)[edit]

Hello Spshu Stinks,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hoax (TV channel) for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. C1776M ^Talk 10:05, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014 (continued)[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. None of your editing has reliable sources, and some of it is clearly false. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:13, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Under Wikipedia policy, if unsourced content is challenged or removed, an editor may not restore it without providing a reliable source. That is a requirement, not an option. You can see the relevant policy section at Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden of evidence. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:17, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Channels Worldwide. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is trolling or other disruptive behavior ever tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} on your user talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Euryalus (talk) 10:18, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]