User talk:Squidward674

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Squidward674, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

Speedy deletion nomination of BB 90[edit]

Hello Squidward674,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged BB 90 for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. War wizard90 (talk) 22:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rahart Adams[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Rahart Adams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 01:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diffs: [1][2] I'm not sure what you mean by "Computer Programs" but in common parlance, a "computer program" is software, like Photoshop, Google Chrome, or Notepad. Please don't make this change again, and if you need help, post a note on the article's talk page. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:22, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your change here, it seems that you actually are referring to a computer program. 1) If you can't explain your edits so that other editors can understand you, you shouldn't be editing here. 2) The content is still misplaced as you are adding it to an article about TV shows (not software programs) "broadcast" (as in over-the-air or via cable/satellite). Please do not add this content, or similar content again, as it will be considered vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:23, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon. Diffs: [3] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:28, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please stop adding more junctions to U.S. Route 101 in California like the comment told you... --Rs chen 7754 01:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Even though you reverted yourself, please use the sandbox instead. –Fredddie ™ 23:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rahart Adams[edit]

Hello Squidward674,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rahart Adams for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Asdklf; (talk) 00:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elizabeth Elias[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Elizabeth Elias requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Everymorning talk 01:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BB 10[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on BB 10 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KJ^Discuss? 08:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BB 33[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on BB 33 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Everymorning talk 19:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

I have blocked you for 48 hours. As an editor, I had concerns about some of your edits to road articles. But with my admin hat on, I would have blocked any editor who creates nonsense articles like BB 10 and thinks that it's okay to keep doing it after they've been told not to on their talk page. So I've gone ahead and blocked you 48 hours, but you will be blocked for longer if you keep doing stuff like this. --Rs chen 7754 23:08, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Every Witch Way[edit]

Hi, Sqidward674: (And sorry for my English)

I want to notify you that in the starring list in Every Witch Way there are only main characters. What and who are main characters? Are who appear in the openning of the series, and in the credits their names are in the first page. In EWW are: Paola Andino (Emma), Nick Merico (Daniel), Paris Smith (Maddie), Rahart Adams (Jax), Elizabeth Elias (Mia), Daniela Nieves (Andi), Tyler Alvarez (Diego), Autumn Wendel (Sophie), Denisea Wilson (Katie) and Zoey Burger (Gigi). They are the main characters, so in the list only they can appear. The rest of the cast (recurring) are importants too, but no are part of the main cast. You can know that because they are not in the openning and in the credits are in the second line. I hope you understand it, Regards. 190.33.67.43 (talk) 18:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniela Nieves[edit]

Hello Squidward674,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daniela Nieves for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 00:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zoey Burger[edit]

Hello Squidward674,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Zoey Burger for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 01:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 01:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elizabeth Elias[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Elizabeth Elias requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VeryCrocker (talk) 04:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth Elias. This is your only warning to stop creating pointless articles at Wikipedia. Your latest article creation at Elizabeth Elias contains this content: {{Infobox person | name=Elizabeth Elias This is absolutely pointless. If you want to experiment with editing, use your sandbox, and if you want to work slowly on an article before it goes live, use the Articles for Creation process. If you submit more useless articles like this, I will nominate you for admin intervention. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 06:09, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Squidward674, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-War wizard90 (talk) 01:53, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]