User talk:Ssabdulhaq
Welcome![edit]
|
April 2011[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Qawwali has been reverted.
Your edit here to Qawwali was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://spicmacay-iimb.blogspot.com/2010/09/qawwali-ensemble-bandanawazi-and-troupe.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:54, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Ateeq Hussain Khan Bandanawazi[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Ateeq Hussain Khan Bandanawazi. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Warsi Brothers. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Warsi Brothers - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 
which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. NortyNort (Holla) 07:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ateeq Hussain Khan Bandanawazi[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ateeq Hussain Khan Bandanawazi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NortyNort (Holla) 08:08, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
The article Ateeq Hussain Khan Bandanawazi has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Lampman (talk) 07:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Ateeq Hussain Khan Bandanawazi[edit]
Speedy deletion nomination of Ateeq Hussain Khan Bandanawazi[edit]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
A tag has been placed on Ateeq Hussain Khan Bandanawazi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. IanOfNorwich (talk) 19:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- As you noticed due to repeated postings including copyrighted text and version that didn't say much about the artist, the title has been protected. What you need to do know is first of all relax as there is no deadline, then get familiar with Wikipedia, maybe by doing some small edits elsewhere and thirdly prepare a draft - from scratch and based on sources without lifting them, say at User:Ssabdulhaq/Draft and then ask the protecting admin, User:Amatulic, whether it is fit for being published.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:26, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case[edit]
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ssabdulhaq for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Logan Talk Contributions 23:27, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
I deny any close connection with Ateeq hussain khan bandanawazi except for being a great fan of his qawwali's[edit]
--Ssabdulhaq (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)sir/madam, I have not met him anytime but know much about him and i am his greatest fan. to create and promote his name in wiki page qawwali current qawwal list was my efforts bcoz bandanawzi qawwal truly deserve to be in the list of qawwals and as a clear proof i have inserted many citations of news media. The media is neutral in Ateeq hussain khan bandanawazi praise and to be fair enough news is not created by fans but by various news papers. it is my request that ateeq hussain's creditibility & Notabilty is established by media (various news papers of India) and he rightly deserve to be in the list of current qawwal's. I will welcome the judgement of wikipedia on this issue.
Here I am just presenting his case as a Notable Qawwal and nothing more to say. --Ssabdulhaq (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)