User talk:Steamroller Assault/2008

Willamette

Sorry I didn't notice I reverted your addition of hops there! Hops are very important. Thanks for not taking it personally. Katr67 (talk) 04:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Beer category decision

A discussion has been opened on changes that have been made to the existing Beer category system. The changes reverse the decision made by the Project in April 2006. The changes were based on agreement by only two people, and by a discussion that took place outside the Beer Project. There may be some merit in the changes, and to prevent future conflict it is important that there is some discussion of the matter. If you're interested, please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Beer#Brewery_cats. SilkTork *^YES! 17:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: vandalism

For some odd reason, users are allowed to remove pretty much anything from their talk pages, even block notices. Practically the only thing people cannot remove is an unblock request while they are blocked. As to the user in question, he has not vandalized any more after I gave him the warning using Huggle. (Which is an tool that automates many of the processes involved in vandal-fighting) So, I don't think it's a major problem now. If he starts in again within a couple of days, feel free to leave a level four warning for the first offense. Cheers! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 01:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

You want to use the level 4im message. Techman224^Talk 00:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Please be more careful -- re: Alex Taylor

When you reverted on Alex Taylor you didn't notice that what you were reverting to was some, rather obvious, vandalism, which had been added a few days before. I've now fixed it. Please be more careful. Thanks! 207.233.32.17 (talk) 01:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks for picking up the pieces after me. Alas, one mistake for every few hundred successful vandalism-reverts does seem to indicate some pretty sloppy work. I will endeavor to be more careful in the future. Steamroller Assault (talk) 23:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Achd page, conflict of interest etc.-- re: Achd

Did you change the Achd page? You removed content that I actually wrote for another publication, but it is my work. I wanted to discuss the conflict of interest, we are a government agency, trying to get factual information out there. No one else has made a page here, I doubt they will. We could tell people who is putting the content online. Thanks for any help you can give me.ACHDWebmaster (talk) 22:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

I did not read that essay. I just try to warn people. Unfortunately, there are so many to warn, I must do my "job" in a rush. I'm pretty new myself, so I'm not very wiki-savvy. I rollbacked my edit, and I couldn't be more sorry. Jonathan321 (talk) 23:28, 18 December 2008 (UTC)