User talk:Steve bloomer

Welcome

Hello, Steve bloomer, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Ioannes Pragensis 20:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1954 World Cup final

I suggest you can leave messages at Talk:1954 FIFA World Cup Final for discussions. Chanheigeorge 17:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolf Kreitlein

"You go slow, you die." Nah, I'm only kidding, I just type pretty quick, and I am a "new page patroller" V. Joe 19:25, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A. Stair

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article A. Stair, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:A. Stair. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Diez2 18:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Rudi Glöckner

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Rudi Glöckner, by Davmid055 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Rudi Glöckner seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Rudi Glöckner, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Rudi Glöckner itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina and England football rivalry

Hi, seen your posts and I was wondering if you can tell me the original spanish translation of what Onega said with They're kicking the shit out of us. Thks Jor70 20:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank Steve for your post. Could you kindly post yours thoughts Here ? so we can discuss it with the others too. Thanks a lot (ps. Please next time write in a talk page not in the user front page :-) Jor70 11:33, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further to your comments on Jor70s page, I did not remove your edits, they are still there, just "hidden", because they were added unsourced. The article needs more content added, but it needs to be sourced especially as it is an article that can have two very different points of view. Also, your recent edits adding about Alf Ramsey, using another wikipedia article as a source is unfortunately not acceptable on wikipedia as a reliable source. However, your edit added something attributed to being said by Alf Ramsey ("a team who come to play football, and not act as animals") which when clicking on the source you provided - his wikipedia article - it actually states that he was misquoted. Reliable sources are external sites and not wikipedia. Thanks and have fun. ♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk 16:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! ♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk 00:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IFAB

There have been some edits corrupting the info about the formation of the IFAB. I notice you asked for a citation some time ago. It originally said 1882 Manchester, and then someone changed it to 1886 and this was called into question and then a meeting in Holborn for 1886 replaced the Manchester meeting. However from [1] we have In 1882, the Football Association, firm in its resolve there should be uniformity in the laws, invited the associations of Scotland, Wales and Ireland to a meeting to discuss the formation of a board to settle their differences and to organize an international championship. Scotland at first declined the invitation, relenting only after the Football Association threatened to end the yearly international matches. At the meeting, held in Manchester on December 6, 1882, the four associations adopted a uniform code and established the International Football Association Board to approve changes in the laws. Each association was given equal voting rights on the board. Jooler 12:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

However the minutes of the first meeting in 1886 can be found here -http://ssbra.org/html/laws/IFABarc/pdf/1886/18861ST.pdf Jooler 12:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1920 Olympic football final

Not quite sure where you got the information from regarding Charles Wreford-Brown being the linesman in the 1920 Olympic final. Can you please state your source?

Most interested to find out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve bloomer (talk • contribs) 17:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steve, I'm afraid I've no real interest in football, Olympic or otherwise, and I didn't add that information anywhere. What article do you have in mind? My bot probably did some spelling corrections on it. Cheers, CmdrObot (talk) 18:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Steve bloomer! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 377 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Karol Galba - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Arnaldo Cézar Coelho - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Italy v England (1948) for deletion

The article Italy v England (1948) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italy v England (1948) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandman888 (talk) 14:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jack Clough

The article Jack Clough has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nonnotable person

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 02:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jack Clough for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Clough is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Clough until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 18:59, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Do you want to help to improve Romanian football ? more teams and football players. Thanks!--Alexiulian25 (talk) 11:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Willy Meisl moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Willy Meisl, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 17:59, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henri Christophe (referee)

The article Henri Christophe (referee) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sahaib3005 (talk) 21:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]