User talk:SwanPR

Please refer to WP:CONFLICT: "Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question."

If you persist in putting PR puffery into articles it will be necessary to take it to WP:COIN. Pinkbeast (talk) 12:20, 25 January 2013 (UTC) (ahem, signed late)

We have reported the incident to the HelpDesk — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwanPR (talk • contribs) 12:10, 25 January 2013‎

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.

May I share the whole event has been raised with the Foundation

Thank you for awaiting there decision — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwanPR (talk • contribs) 12:54, 25 January 2013‎

User name

Your user name implies that it belongs to an organisation, not to an individual, so you need to read WP:CORPNAME. - David Biddulph (talk) 12:48, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Psychonaut (talk) 12:54, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. - It appears that you didn't read the previous notification before deleting it. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry David, I'm after the truth, that's all Regards Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwanPR (talk • contribs) 13:07, 25 January 2013

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of the username policy, edit warring and promotional editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Yunshui 雲‍水 13:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Dear All

SwanPR

It is a shame you have decided to block this account for sharing the truth. Even if you do allow editing of the Train2Game page by us in the future we will no longer attempt to do so. We will leave it to the students as to that which should be written and/or changed. We will advise them of the Wiki attitude.

Eric Swan — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwanPR (talk • contribs) 14:24, 25 January 2013

The threshold for inclusion is verifiability, not truth. Please consider this point if and when you return. --Drm310 (talk) 06:06, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SwanPR for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ukexpat (talk) 15:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC)