User talk:TacticalPepsodent1184

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Tacticaltatical123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 32' Transportable Port Security Boat, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉ 04:09, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 32' Transportable Port Security Boat[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 32' Transportable Port Security Boat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://digital-sf.com/worksamples/Boat%20Operator's%20Handbook_33TPSB-Jul-2012c.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉ 04:09, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Response boat - Small II[edit]

Hello, Tacticaltatical123. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Response boat - Small II, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:56, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, TacticalPepsodent1184. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ships at Pearl harbor[edit]

I reverted your change at Attack on Pearl Harbor. There was one Coast Guard cutter, the Taney. The other ten vessels cited were not cutters. It's a good reference, and probably worth including somewhere, but not in the infobox (and in particular, if you do cite 11 coast guard ships, you should decrease the "other" ships from 49 to 39). Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 19:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you are correct about the other vessels, my mistake, but the Tiger and Reliance were both 125 ft Active class cutters and were classified as cutters along with the Taney. So it should be at least 3 cutters. Most of the historical documents about these cutters are now unavailable because the Coast Guard recently changed it's website. TacticalPepsodent1184 (talk) 20:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Tiger and Reliance were listed as Patrol Boats (even in your second reference, to the Active class), rather than Cutters. Maybe today's definition is that anything longer than 20 meters is a cutter (I don't know, do you have a cite for that?), was it the case at the time? Tarl N. (discuss) 01:54, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the official classification was "Patrol Cutter" but like I said, most of the documents are unavailable now. This is the page that states that a cutter is at least 65 feet: *Assistant Commandant for Capability (CG-7) Office of Cutter Forces (CG-751) Even the Island class patrol boats or the Marine Protector class patrol boats are considered cutters, those are a few modern examples. I don't know if it this applied in the 1940's. TacticalPepsodent1184 (talk) 02:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That reference says what's under the Office of Cutter Forces, almost certainly a modern organizational definition. But applying that to 1941 is WP:OR. Unless you can show that definition applied back then, or find something which references those particular ships as cutters, it's a problem - the references you've cited so far don't use that term. Tarl N. (discuss) 07:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. here. Another of the Active class, termed a cutter. Tarl N. (discuss) 07:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it does. These 3 links refer to a ship of the Active class or the Active class itself as cutters, Coast Guard Cutters & Craft,Vigilant IV, ACTIVE cutters (125-ft) (1927).

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, TacticalPepsodent1184. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]