User talk:Talleyrand6
Welcome![edit]
|
A belated welcome![edit]
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Talleyrand6! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! DHSchool2003Student (talk) 01:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Archived Sections[edit]
All of the sections I just archived can be found here at User talk:Talleyrand6/Archive 1 DHSchool2003Student (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
| Thank you for the superb and high quality maps you've created. From the US, to Italy , to Australia—your map making skills are highly appreciated and make this site much better. Here's to more fantastic work 🍻! Aficionado538 (talk) 23:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC) |
Aficionado538 (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Could you fix this image, as it has "2022" at the top. Also, could you remove the parliamentary diagram, as it's unnecessary. Cheers, Number 57 22:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- No, the chart stays.
- But I will renumber. Talleyrand6 (talk) 23:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- The chart is already in the article in the results table – there's no need to have it twice. There was recently a discussion about infobox maps becoming unnecessarily complex, and this is one of the things that contributes towards that. Please remove it. If it's not removed, then I will remove the maps and replace them with simpler ones like File:Elections federales suisses 2019 Conseil national.svg. Thanks, Number 57 01:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, sure, there might be some "discussion" promoting simpler maps (which I've seen absolutely none of, and in fact quite a lot of discussion supporting higher quality maps), but I must say that threatening to replace a pretty nice map all things considered (well, duh, I made it) with a pretty low quality map is certainly a thing one can do. It's quite a comical idea to me, to be honest. I'll concede that the chart is actually quite redundant in the grand scheme of the article, so I'll remove it. Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- The chart is already in the article in the results table – there's no need to have it twice. There was recently a discussion about infobox maps becoming unnecessarily complex, and this is one of the things that contributes towards that. Please remove it. If it's not removed, then I will remove the maps and replace them with simpler ones like File:Elections federales suisses 2019 Conseil national.svg. Thanks, Number 57 01:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
2020 PA[edit]
We gave it our best fight patriot but the feds caught us eventually o7 Ohaiyoan124 (talk) 00:19, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Literally 1984 Talleyrand6 (talk) 00:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Welcome back[edit]
Saw it on Twitter, congrats. 沁水湾 (talk) 15:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome back. Thanks for your recent edit at 2024 British Columbia general election. I am not sure if the party will release riding specific data concerning the 2024 Alberta New Democratic Party leadership election. If so, that might be an article that could use your expertise, should you have the time and interest in the topic. Of course, it is three months away before we will have any results. Anyway, happy editing.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 18:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Map Style[edit]
Oh my gosh, I absolutely loved the new U.S. Presidential Election map style you created. It's so good, and I hope others can see what I saw in the style. Thank you so much for sharing!! Lostfan333 (talk) 23:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
June 2024[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guerillero Parlez Moi 02:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)- Part of the block is due to off-site canvasing that was brought to my attention in my role as a CU. I am willing to share the information with any functionary who wishes to review the blocks per policy. -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 02:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- CUs may want to see ticket:2024061710001045 -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 03:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Block Appeal[edit]
Talleyrand6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'll make this brief. As I understand I was placed on thin ice. All of my actions over the last few days have kept that in mind. Nothing that I have done or am suspected of doing has been with the intent of further breaking Wikipedia rules. That said, I want to challenge the block on the grounds that these are unfair assertions. I have not and did not disruptively edit over the course of this conflict. I made one edit this entire time and it was to the 1988 French Legislative Election and I did so fully within my right and fully within Wikipedia guidelines. Secondly, I want to see evidence of me having canvased anyone for their support in any action for the events which took place today or yesterday. If you appeal to my Twitter page, I will report that there has been no canvassing on my part. All of my posts were made in good faith in order to document this dispute on Wikipedia to other users on that website. I ask for due process to know where I went wrong with my documentation and I kindly ask to know on what grounds you you believe that to be canvassing. Again, despite aspirations to my character and my previous ban, I wish to say that nothing was done knowingly in violation of any Wikipedia rules. If they were so, it was without my knowing. Wishing for a swift resolution, yours in editing, Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm referring this block back to ArbCom to investigate the off-wiki harassment and canvassing allegations. – bradv 17:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
hello?[edit]
Talleyrand6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Can one of you please review my block here. Like literally just anything. Just respond. I want due process. Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
One request at a time please. – bradv 17:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
June 2024[edit]
You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-en
wikimedia.org).
Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.