User talk:Tama Fan

Welcome!

Hello, Tama Fan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Some of your edits had to be reverted because we cannot include lyrics of songs that are under copyright, except where as fair use guidelines allow limited excerpts. mwalimu59 (talk) 17:12, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hakuna Matata (song) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~~Ebe123~~ ^talk_Contribs 19:41, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Be Prepared (song) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~~Ebe123~~ ^talk_Contribs 19:46, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, we cannot include include full song lyrics in articles about songs due to concerns about copyright. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (music) and Wikipedia:Lyrics and poetry for more discussion. Also note that where others are making changes you disagree with, including reverting your own edits, the appropriate method of dealing with it is to discuss the changes with other editors in the article's talk page in an effort to reach a consensus. Simply reapplying or reverting the edits repeatedly without discussion may be considered unacceptable behavior that could result in your access to the site being blocked. mwalimu59 (talk) 14:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of My Little Pony characters‎, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- MelbourneStar☆ ^{(talk to me)} 12:47, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of My Little Pony characters. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 13:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- MelbourneStar☆ ^{(talk to me)} 10:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Denied

Only the ponies that got major roles in any animation will be added. No Minors.Blackgaia02 (Talk if you're Worthy) (talk) 16:02, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No

I didn't mean that you SHOULD delete all the minor characters. You are just too blunt to understand ANYTHING don't you? I am sorry to say but stop badly editing/remove everything, UNDERSTOOD??Blackgaia02 (Talk if you're Worthy) (talk) 23:35, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please Understand these

First of all: SPEAK.PROPER.ENGLISH. What country are you from??
Second: Not all ponies and sources were needed, I'll just add up to the page cache and to the confusion. Have you WENT to the talk page yet?
Third: PHOTOBUCKET IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE. And your summary for My Little Pony: Twinkle Wish Adventure should not be a FULL telling of the whole story!

I don't like to break the validity of each pony's toy release ok. You gotta understand for once that I'm trying to make things valid.Blackgaia02 (Talk if you're Worthy) (talk) 15:58, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for sockpuppetry. You have clearly been editing from this account and several IP addresses in an attempt to give the misleading impression that your opinions are supported by several independent editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why I'm blocked. I don't reverted this. Tama Fan (talk) 10:28, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked you because the sockpuppetry was some time ago. However, please don't try to pretend to be more than one person again. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. Tama Fan (talk) 13:37, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tama Fan. You have new messages at Blackgaia02's talk page.
Message added 13:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

v/r - T P 13:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "List of My Little Pony characters". Thank you. --v/r - T P 21:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Enough editing MLP Tales

I must ask to stop editing on the MLP Tales, since the outcome doesn't improve the page in any way.

Point One: Addition of too much detail is a form of page bloating and taking up a lot of space within an article. Point Two: Addition of information out of your own idea is pure speculation. There is no island mentioned regarding the Glow n' Show Ponies, they mentioned of the sort. It's your own guesswork. The same applies to Rosy dyeing her hair which is not so and other little details you added yourself. Point Three: There is absolutely no need to describe every individual pony which star as group in specifics since not much about them is identified and they only appear in one episode. Point Four: The hairstyle doesn't make a difference in character description. After all they change the hairstyle in various episodes for certain occasions.

Before you even think of editing again. I suggest you discuss and even learn the policies of notability, otherwise don't bother changing the page again. Deltasim (talk) 16:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Island mentioned regarding the Glow n' Show Ponies and Rosy dyeing her hair are not my ideas. Tama Fan (talk) 18:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

The List of Cars characters is long enough as it is. Please don't add minutiae. --Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:14, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tama Fan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Test

Yes, in real life, identical twins cannot have different eye colors. However, in real life Identical twins also can't be of different sexes and that commonly happens in fiction (see Phil and Lil from Rugrats as an example). Fiction, by definition, does not have to follow real life rules. Everything else about their appearance (and their intelligence) makes it clear they're supposed to be identical twins. Furthermore, a lot of the eye colors in this show are either impossible or improbable for the characters. I'm changing it again, please do not revert it.FamAD123 (talk) 20:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phil and Lil also looked identical in All Grown Up. They're supposed to be identical twins. Yes, fraternal twins can look almost exactly alike, but it really just seems like you're being obstinate here. Do you really think the writers went "let's make fraternal twins, only change their eye color". I really don't see why you're making this a big deal, again, fiction does not have to conform to real life laws. If it didn, most of the things that happened in Johnny Test wouldn't happen, because they'd be impossible.FamAD123 (talk) 20:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

references

Hi, you added info on Twinless twin without a reference. It was easy enough to find, and I've added it now, but really information shouldn't be added without a source, please ensure any info you add, especially about living people, is sourced. thanks Rayman60 (talk) 02:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tama Fan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tama Fan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]