User talk:Tarsame Mittal

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Tarsame Mittal. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Tarsame Mittal, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarsame Mittal (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tarsame Mittal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tarsame Mittal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 06:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarsame Mittal (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tol were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft only relies on primary sources as references. Wikipedia articles should primarily be based on secondary sources. Please add some secondary sources supporting this draft's claims.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tarsame Mittal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 07:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tarsame Mittal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tarsame Mittal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 08:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarsame Mittal (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tarsame Mittal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:33, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tarsame Mittal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tarsame Mittal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A00:23EE:2150:2D23:CC07:12FF:FEF2:EAD9 (talk) 08:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarsame Mittal (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tol were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tarsame Mittal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 08:38, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We have been trying to make a Wikipedia for Tarsame Mittal, can you please unblock the account and guide us properly and where are we going wrong Tarsame Mittal (talk) 13:17, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A person is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because they exist. All topics must be notable by Wikipedia's definition to merit inclusion. In the specific case of a person, they must meet the notability criteria for people. And in the case of a person who is still alive, an article must meet the strict requirements of Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons.

If you are the person that you have been writing about, then you should not do so, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. We have no interest in what a person wishes to say about themselves, as this is an inherent conflict of interest.

If you are not the person that you are writing about, then your account name should not match this person's name. Should this person ever become notable, then your account name would be considered impersonation.

Your use of the word "we" also implies that more than one person has access to this account. Access to Wikipedia accounts can never be shared. The person who creates the account must be the only one with access to it. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:32, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On this page you have twice written "My Name is Tarsame Mittal and I am a Businessman, Talent Manager", whereas in UTRS appeal number 76980 you wrote "This page is created for a living person and is not made by Tarsame Mittal himself", confirming that more than one person has used this account. JBW (talk) 08:23, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge my error in understanding the Wikipedia guidelines. I will make sure only my account, the one used initially, is the only account used to make and edit this page. Please help me create this page successfully at the earliest! Tarsame Mittal (talk) 08:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Instructions on how to post an unblock request are given above. If you choose to do so then I very strongly recommend reading the guide to appealing blocks first. However, you are not likely to be unblocked in order to create a page written to promote, publicise, or extol Tarsame Mittal, be he yourself, your client, your friend, or whatever. That is not what Wikipedia is for. JBW (talk) 09:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a humble request to unblock the draft otherwise I will loose my job Tarsame Mittal (talk) 11:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for your circumstances, but any real-life consequences that result from your block are not our concern. If you are being directed by a superior to make these edits, please read Wikipedia:When your boss tells you to edit Wikipedia. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:33, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS

UTRS appeal #76980 has been closed. JBW (talk) 08:14, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]