User talk:TeamJG

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Joachim Garraud because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joachim Garraud. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Joachim Garraud was changed by TeamJG (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908126 on 2016-02-11T11:55:42+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joachim Garraud, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Joachim Garraud was changed by TeamJG (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887959 on 2016-02-12T13:03:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]