User talk:Telxon04

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not undo my edit of the Days of our Lives page. The "O" in "our" in the title IS NOT intended to be capitalized and has never been at anytime in the show's history. This is because the show's creator, Ted Corday intended the title to represent the days of the tv viewers lives not just the characters featured on the show. So using the lower case "o" in "our" is totally correct. This has been debated numerous times on Wikipedia in the past, but has always been reverted to the lower case "o". Although it appears to be a grammatical error (one that has gone unnoticed for nearly 50 years, as the unaware editors of it must assume) it in fact is correct when used in the title of this show. Again, you will not find the "o" in "our" capitalized by any legitimate reference to the show. Due to this fact, it is incorrect to capitalize it on Wikipedia as that would change the meaning of the title.

The article Brendan Coughlin has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. VQuakr (talk) 04:11, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Michael W. Smith, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Karl 334 TALK to ME 14:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All My Children[edit]

Thank you for your interest on the All My Children article. Unfortunately, I had to revert you edit because it wasn't backed with any sources. You're welcome to add it back with a reliable reference. In the mean time, I have corrected the previous version of the article to specify that the decline of ratings is specifically in regard to the Nielsen ratings and not necessarily for All My Children altogether.

Regards Farine (talk) 16:17, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Days of Our Lives, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Farine (talk) 04:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

Do not use an anonymous IP address disrupt Wikipedia's policy as you did with this edit. Just because you don't like something on an article, that's no excuse to remove it, especially when it is backed with sources. If you are going to an delete a sourced paragraph from an article, you must always provide an edit summary.

You've been editing long enough on Wikipedia to know what the policies are. And your constant disregard unresponsiveness to the notices you are receiving demonstrates your unwillingness to collaborate. So consider this as your final warning before this account as well as your anonymous IP address both get blocked from editing Wikipedia. Farine (talk) 18:32, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Parson's has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sourcing found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:43, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Parson's for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parson's is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parson's until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Telxon04. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Stephen Anthony Salyers II, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Stephen Anthony Salyers II to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, TKK bark ! 11:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Telxon04. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added Dismas. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sublimity City Edits[edit]

Could you PLEASE provide a source for the edits your are providing on Sublimity City. The edits tyhat are there are being removed as they are unsourced close paraphrasing...,Coal town guy (talk) 01:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add my voice: please provide sources. If you're having trouble, we can help you format references. The New Deal "experimental community" angle is interesting and encyclopedia-worthy, but it should be well-sourced. You might consider a sandbox draft first. In the meantime, I'll see what I can turn up. Acroterion (talk) 02:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vicki Lawrence may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |The Family]]'' sketches she originated the character of [[Thelma Harper|Thelma Harper/Mama]], (the elderly [[supporting character]] who was series star ''[[Carol Burnett's]]'' character ''[[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Vicki Lawrence
added links pointing to The Family, Eunice and Joe Hamilton
Thelma Harper
added links pointing to Southern and Eunice

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julie Reeves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WTCR. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited B-boying, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Hughes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Telxon04. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Huntington, West Virginia
added links pointing to Huntington, Army Corps of Engineers and MSA
Thomas Carroll House
added a link pointing to Guyandotte

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kilgore, Kentucky, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Telxon04. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kilgore, Kentucky, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kilgore, Kentucky[edit]

Hello, Telxon04. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kilgore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Telxon04. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kentucky Route 1134 (April 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Telxon04! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Telxon04. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Kentucky Route 1134.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:19, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peterman Hill for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peterman Hill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peterman Hill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hog Farm Talk 05:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Neal, Kentucky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, cannot find any evidence this town existed with a basic search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 18:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]