User talk:Tezzy149

William Sledd[edit]

Deletion review is here: WP:DRV, but it is polite to bring the problem up with the deleting admin first, so, although you might have done it as a last resort, it was the right thing to do anyway. I've had a look back at the AfD and I don't really see any reason to revise the decision. WP:BIO demands multiple independent sources where he is the subject, not just where he is mentioned in passing, and these weren't provided during the AfD. I recommend looking for those sources and then rewriting the article, but you are, of course, free to take it to deletion review if you prefer. Cheers, Yomangani ^talk 21:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Lisa P. Jackson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Click here for details of your recent vandalism. Alansohn 19:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Lisa Windsor, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anna512 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to have been mistaken. My sincerest apologies. See my talk page for details. --Anna512 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lisa Windsor, to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to April 16. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to March 2, you will be blocked from editing. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Bridgemixture.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bridgemixture.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:11, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]