User talk:Thatemooverthere

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
float
float
Friendly messages are much appreciated! Please add new conversations below. Thanks! — Thatemooverthere

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Thatemooverthere! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dougweller (talk) 07:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Andrew Biersack[edit]

I've responded to your post at Talk:Andrew Biersack. Tra (Talk) 17:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Never Give In (Black Veil Brides EP)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Never Give In (Black Veil Brides EP), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Isn't a official EP, their official web page do not include this release. The references aren't reliable. This article is a hoax!

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Renegade Mons†er 23:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Andy Biersack's broken nose.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andy Biersack's broken nose.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WheresTristan 20:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Knives and Pens single cover.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Knives and Pens single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 13:08, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Knives and Pens intro interview clip.ogg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Knives and Pens intro interview clip.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 13:08, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ecruz[edit]

You're welcome and if you could help me on that Get Scared EP page that would be nice.

Okay I finished both of the pages with cover arts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecruz10111 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"In The End" all done buddy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecruz10111 (talk • contribs) 03:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Legion Of The Black" is complete!

Honestly I like it but it doesn't seem like a BVB-style cover art, it looks too fan-made, unless it was made official somehow, I just use the one it has now since it fits well, as the cover art on my iTunes.

Acoustic cover art added! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecruz10111 (talk • contribs) 23:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wretched and Divine: Ultimate Edition cover added and thanks for making it easier with that extra info :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecruz10111 (talk • contribs) 02:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BVB[edit]

Hey! I know you're interested in a lot of Black Veil Brides articles, so here there's a lot of new images of the band. Sorry for my poor English (I know read English very good, but I can't write it as well). Goodbye. No Future For You (talk) 19:13, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reflections[edit]

Thank you for adding information in Reflections, I really appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EnterTheBetrayel (talk • contribs) 22:52, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, they're an awesome band. I bought Exi(s)t the day it came out and I went to see them live with Erra and several other bands on October 25 in Birmingham and they were both great! Later, I'm gonna merge what you did on The Fantasy Effect with what I have on my draft page (User:Thatemooverthere/The Fantasy Effect). And for future reference, when you write on a talk page, use 4 tildes (~) to make your signature. If you ever need any help here on Wikipedia, let me know by hitting me up on my talk page. — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 21:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BVB info[edit]

Hi I work for BVB. I can help you update the Wiki with the most accurate info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeAwareX1 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You work for BVB? In what way? And if you really do work for them, I would LOVE to help you guys out! I am probably the most dedicated editor of BVB's Wikipedia pages! — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 17:37, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
email me Dan@mercenarymanagement.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeAwareX1 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done—under the email Kevin Benoit kevinbenwadawadawada@gmail.com and subject "Wikipedia BVB" — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 04:22, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)BeAwareX1: Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Thatemooverthere: Please be careful when helping someone with a Conflict of Interest edit an article, especially if you are even slightly biased in their favor. As "probably the most dedicated editor of BVB's Wikipedia pages!" you are likely somewhat less objective than someone who doesn't care a bit about BVB. As such, you need to be extra-cautious about "helping" someone affiliated with BVB edit that article. If you can't bring yourself to withdraw your offer to BeAwareX1 to help him edit the BVB article(s), I encourage you to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and treat BVB-related articles as if you have a conflict of interest even if you do not. This means suggesting changes on the talk page and waiting for other editors to make the changes, or not make the changes. If you do decide to make direct edits to the article without first proposing them on the talk page, you may find that many of your edits are reverted. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)Davidwr There are important things that need to be addressed with this Wiki. Wrong logo (the real Mourning Star is tilted, the one available here is straight), missing awards, missing sources, and you even claimed they didn't have an official website (www.blackveilbrides.net) in your most recent edit. Nevermind the legal issues that resulted in Wiki members adding BOOTLEG and flat our FAKE releases to their discography back in 2011. I'm not asking for edit in favor of the artist, just edits that reflect real information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeAwareX1 (talk • contribs) 20:34, 20 January 2014‎

@BeAwareX1:Removal of unsourced or not-reliably-sourced incorrect and/or defamatory information about living people is highly encouraged by Wikipedia's WP:Biographies of living persons policy. This is one of the major exceptions to the Conflict of Interest guideline. Other than this and other exceptions listed in WP:COI, the rules in WP:COI apply to editors who edit with a conflict of interest.
Be wary of removing well-sourced incorrect or defamatory information if you have a conflict of interest. For example, if the New York Times said "Davidwr defrauded $10M from the Wikimedia Foundation" and I knew it was false, I could not remove that information unless either the NYT had retracted it or another reliable source had subsequently reported otherwise. Even if another reliable source DID say otherwise, if the NYT stood by their remarks, I could not remove a line that said "The New York Times said 'Davidwr defrauded $10M from the Wikimedia Foundation.'" because it's a fact that the NYTimes said it and it's a reliable source. However, I could recommend the removal of that text on the article's talk page and/or the addition of other information to bring the article back to being WP:Neutral and being less misleading. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion involving transgender issues[edit]

You may want to be aware of and possibly join in: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 121#MOS:IDENTITY clarification. Skyerise (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Thatemooverthere. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Davey Suicide[edit]

Hello Thatemooverthere,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Davey Suicide for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

DrStrauss talk 11:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature[edit]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

— '''[[User:Thatemooverthere|<font color="black">Tha†</font><font color="red">emo</font><font color="black">over</font><font color="red">†here</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Thatemooverthere|(talk)]]</small>''' : — Tha†emoover†here (talk)

to

— '''[[User:Thatemooverthere|<span style="color: black">Tha†</span><span style="color: red">emo</span><span style="color: black">over</span><span style="color: red">†here</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Thatemooverthere|(talk)]]</small>''' : — Tha†emoover†here (talk)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 09:36, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Anomalocaris: No problem ;) — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 02:04, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hawking[edit]

Good catch on that Pi Day removal. In case you didn't already realise, it had been added just 5 minutes earlier. I was just about to remove it, but you beat me by a minute. 👍 – numbermaniac 04:57, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was only right. Such an inappropriate thing to mention about a recently dead person... — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 05:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And it was coincidental. I just stumbled upon it. — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 05:08, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're a service to both your country and to mankind.[edit]

Sail Hatan!
Infant Annihilator really needs to have a page. I looked into creating one a year or two ago, and they didn't seem to meet the criteria, but at this point they're widespread and established to an extent that the absence is notably strange. Once you make the page, let me know so I can follow it, and I'll advocate for its permanence. TheLoneDeranger (talk) 05:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Infant Annihilator has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Infant Annihilator. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 07:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Infant Annihilator has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Infant Annihilator. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 14:28, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Infant Annihilator has been accepted[edit]

Infant Annihilator, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:59, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cannibal Corpse Dispute[edit]

First, I closed your dispute resolution noticeboard request for Cannibal Corpse because it is obviously a conduct issue, involving the improper removal of talk page requests, and DRN is a place to discuss content issues and reach compromises on content, not a place to deal with misconduct. I advised you to report the misconduct at WP:ANI. However, second, it seems that the other editor has been blocked as a compromised account. Go ahead and edit the article, discussing your edits with any other editors who participate in discussion. The disruptive editing may have been done by a vandal or hacker using the compromised account. In any case, edit and discuss; the dispute has been taken care of for now. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The nature of the block has been changed. The account has been blocked as a sockpuppet. In any case, you may edit normally. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:59, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: Thank you for messaging me. I'm kinda new to the deeper inner workings of WP, including policy and things like dispute resolution. I was unaware of WP:ANI and assumed everything was reported to WP:DRN, so thank you for telling me about it so I don't make that mistake again in the future! — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 13:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question about talk page guidelines[edit]

Hi Thatmooverthere. I saw you post at WT:TPG#Help me. Although I originally responded there, it was suggested that it would be better to have reponded here instead. So, I am moving my comment here.

We can't really make editors communicate with us or engage in discussion when they don't want to; moreover, for the most part, they are allowed to remove posts or blank their user talk page per WP:BLANKING. At the same time, it is assumed that if they remove a post or blank their user talk page that they have read and understand everything posted on it; in other words, choosing not to respond does not mean they can claim that innocence later on if their editing is problematic. All you can do is properly notify them of issues and attempt to discuss things with them to resolve these issues. If the issues persist and the editor is not listening, then you can bring the matter up for discussion at the appropriate noticeboard.

The other editor, however, should not be removing your posts from Talk:Cannibal Corpse without providing a very good reason policy or guideline based reason for doing so. If they remove your article talk page posts again, just bring the matter up for discussion at WP:ANI. One thing I noticed is that it appears the editor is using WP:TWINKLE. Since they are still a new editor, they might not be familiar with how Twinkle works and when it should be used. This does not mean they are not responsible for any mistakes they make using Twinkle, but it might also indicate that they misunderstand WP:NOTVANDAL and just made a good-faith error here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:36, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Thanks for replying. I saw your comment both here and there, and I thank you for explaining. Someone else also explained to me that the user was blocked in the discussion above this one. I'm kinda new to dispute resolution and more specific editing policies and I wasn't sure where to turn because I wasn't aware of WP:ANI. In the future, I won't be asking for help in random talk pages! (lol) Thanks again. — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources[edit]

Hi, i really appreciate your creation of the Infant Annihilator page, but I'd advise you to look over WP:RS to get a better feeling for reliable sources. I went through the page and helped removing and fixing sentences that were all backed by terrible stuff like Spirit of Metal (which is essentially cancer because their content is always wrong) and webzines (which don't quality under the reliable source criteria). Hope I didnt come off like a dick in any of my edit summaries. Wasn't so aware who the main contributor was before I went into a heavy editing binge on the page. Also as a side unrelated note, do you like Decimated Humans? Second Skin (talk) 21:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Second Skin: Hey, I saw last night in the page history that you had went through and edited a lot of the content (I just published The Elysian Grandeval Galèriarch yesterday and was seeing if anyone had noticed it yet), but I had to go to work so I couldn't review the actual content of the edits you made (third shifts are fun, woooo). I still have yet to check out what all you changed, but I thank you for taking the time to go through and review it. You're actually the first editor other than me to make actual significant edits to the pages since they went live. I kinda just cranked them both out really quickly this month (because I enjoy the music and saw that it met the criteria at WP:MUSIC), so there was bound to be some kind of typos and other issues. Also, I am actually still working on one more related page for Dan Watson here since he also became notable per WP:MUSIC after both Enterprise Earth and Infant Annihilator became notable. I'll review the WP:RS later when I have more time. And I'm amazed to see that there's a page called WP:DICK lol.
And I've never heard of Decimated Humans, as I'm really new to the whole slam/grind scene (I'm assuming that's what it is), but I will check them out, again, when I have the time. (I've been into deathcore for the past few years, but bands like Vulvodynia, Abominable Putridity, Dehumanizing Itatrain Worship, and Operation Cunt Destroyer have me interested in this "slam" thing now...)

And what did you mean by "Wasn't so aware who the main contributor was before I went into a heavy editing binge on the page."? Do we know each other from somewhere else on this site?

P.S.
Regarding your dickish (lol) edit summary criticizing my lack of knowledge on what is slam/grindgore, I wrote those genres into the page solely based on AnimalFarm's self-applied genres on their Bandcamp page and other pages (I'm assuming you were referring to the genre labels for AnimalFarm in that summary), so maybe it is the actual band that doesn't know what slam and grindgore is? (though admittedly I don't know their genre or the differences between all these genres either lol) If you wanna help me out with that, I'd actually love it if you gave me a crash course or helped me understand what exactly is slam, grindgore, brutal death metal, etc, because they all sound so similar to me... slam is like Vulvodynia, Analepsy, Dehumanizing Itatrain Worship, and Abominable Putridity? But then Abominable Putridity and Ingested is also brutal death metal? But Ingested is also deathcore? Cattle Decapitation is grind? Are they considered slam too? Help me understand what's the difference between all these bands that justifies the different genre labels haha... I've noticed a lot of slam bands have the really slow chugging parts on the first few frets of the low strings and pig squeals, but deathcore bands also do those things, so I'm confused... And Vulvodynia's songs from their first EP that they re-recorded on Psychosadistic Design (especially "Forced Fecal Ingestion") really sound similar to Abominable Putridity's album The Anomalies of Artificial Origin to me, so why is that slam and not bdm? Help meeeee haha...

Sorry for the essay... and it's okay, I've also been a dick in my edit summaries before... — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 14:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC

Well Vulvodynia and Operation Cunt Destroyer are a LOT more deathcore than much else, that's barely slam. If you want to check out actual purist slam, this is definitive slam, some other bands to check out are Epicardiectomy, Cerebral Incubation and Gorevent. So there ya go, there's four slam bands right there for you. Vulvodynia and trash like them (super shitty band I have to say) is widely considered just deathcore that gets passed off as "slam", they have some influences from the genre but they try so hard and market themselves as such. If you listen to the links I provided above, you'll get the better general idea of what it sounds like. Slam is actually a slow style of brutal death metal, which focuses mainly on the slow chugging parts which are referred to as slams or slam riffs. Also if you want a better in-depth explanation on how to tell slam death metal and deathcore apart, I recommend that you see this article if what I explained above isn't enough. I just had to remove the parts on the Infant Annihilator article where you were calling them "slam" away because that is just so, so wrong. Haha
...And as for Abominable Putridity, they can to some extent be called "slam", but it's VERY entry level slam, that's like saying you absolutely love deathcore but you only know Suicide Silence. AP's FIRST album (In the End of Human Existence) is a definitive slam album, but their second (The Anomalies of Artificial Origin) is more technical brutal death than it is slam death. In short, slam death metal is just really retarded-sounding slow pulverizing brutal death metal that focuses on slam riffs. There's your lesson for the day. And as for Decimated Humans, if you want to check them out here you go. In my personal opinion, theyre like Vulvodynia but a lot better (even their vocalist is featured on one of their songs). Anyway, hope this helped Second Skin (talk) 00:03, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and PS: Cattle Decapitation is not slam by any means, like not even close. That's just death metal.

Pending changes reviewer granted[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

~Swarm~ {talk} 07:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
I know this is a bit belated, with you having returned last year, but all the same, welcome back! Thanks for all your past and present contributions to the project. I hope you decide to stick around for a while! Best, ~Swarm~ {talk} 07:16, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Swarm: Thank you! (I say nearly two years later...) — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 18:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enterprise Earth[edit]

Hi, have this on my watchlist. If you want to remove the notability tag it would help if you could replace some or all of the facebook refs with refs from better sites for notability such as those listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources, regards 18:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Joe Biden[edit]

Hey there. There will be plenty of time to update the BLPs for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris once the votes are certified or a preponderance of reliable sources report them as having won the election. Appreciate your enthusiasm, but please sit tight for a bit. Also, please ensure that edits you mark as minor, really are minor. This particular issue is under heavy discussion of the talk page for Joe Biden and the consensus is to leave it as is until more news agencies call the race. It'll happen, just need to be patient. Best to you. QueenofBattle (talk) 15:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@QueenofBattle: Thank you for correcting that edit, I honestly have NO memory of this edit and feel kind of weirded out looking at it and wondering what happened. I don't remember the text nor do I remember the citation provided. Not sure why it is attributed to me... Thanks for the concern and for pointing it out to me! — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 18:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Information icon Hey, Thatemooverthere, I'm a little concerned about the edit summary here, which appears to be misleading. This isn't a typo fix, and it's not a minor change. —valereee (talk) 12:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@Valereee: Thank you for pointing this out, I honestly have NO memory of this edit and feel kind of weirded out looking at it and wondering what happened. I don't remember the text nor do I remember the citation provided. Not sure why it is attributed to me... Thanks for the concern and for letting me know! — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 18:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's been a while. :) Best to you. —valereee (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thatemooverthere&oldid=1124472167"