User talk:TheLoneDeranger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


@TheLoneDeranger: The binding energy one works but I think we're in agreement that the other needs some attention from a sexologist. You have another? Etherfire (talk) 19:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, TheLoneDeranger, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies[edit]

I didn't see that you already started a discussion on the article's talk page. Please accept my apologies for this, and feel free to message me if you have any questions or concerns. Happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:51, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infant Annihilator[edit]

Hey, thanks for the kind words! I also believe Infant Annihilator is notable enough, per Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Criteria for musicians and ensembles numbers 1. and 2. They are widely known and discussed in the metal and deathcore communities and according to Billboard.com, they have indeed charted in several charts for The E.G.G. album. I've finished the article enough to where I feel okay with publishing it, but the page Infant Annihilator is currently locked down so only admins can create it, due to multiple versions of the page being created in the past before the band was notable. I will try and submit it for creation, but no guarantee that they will accept it. I've known many editors/admins to be sticklers... You can vouch for its importance/notability in the talk pages at User talk:Thatemooverthere/Infant Annihilator and Talk:Infant Annihilator. — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 04:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My draft, since submission for review earlier today, has been moved to the public space Draft:Infant Annihilator. You can vouch for the article's importance in the talk pages at Draft talk:Infant Annihilator :) — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 05:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Thatemooverthere: Thanks for the heads-up and hyperlinks. I put some affirmation in the draft's talk page. Great looking page btw; will follow and contrib if it gets approved. TheLoneDeranger (talk) 20:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TheLoneDeranger: hey, it's me again! I didn’t know this at the time, but you can leave a comment of affirmation directly at the top of the Draft:Infant Annihilator page (where it is more likely to be seen) by using this template:

{{afc comment|1=your comment here}}

This template is used for giving opinions on draft submissions. just leave it above the "----". I posted a comment of my own there and you can too :) — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 10:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page was accepted! You can now view the page Infant Annihilator :D — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 18:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More Infant Annihilator[edit]

Because I expect Infant Annihilator to be accepted into the Wiki, I am also working on an article for their second album. If you would like to help me edit it, ask questions or post references/anything in the talk page, or keep track of its progress, you can view it here. — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 20:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gap in "Neo-Marxism" edit[edit]

Greetings and felicitations. I was just reading the "Neo-Marxism" article and noticed a gap in the sentence beginning with

Economically, neo-Marxist thought leaders such as moved beyond the era

Since you made the edit, I thought you might want to fill in who the thought leaders are/were, especially since I have no knowledge of the topic. —DocWatson42 (talk) 01:29, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]