User talk:TheLachrymistFilm

This is TheLachrymistFilm's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lachrymist (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the references are to IMDB, which is not reliable, and other unreliable sources. Please add reliable independent sources such as reviews of the movie.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Lachrymist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! TheLachrymistFilm, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Draft:The Lachrymist, and I noticed that your username, "TheLachrymistFilm", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Jack Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:17, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just giving you a head's up about this - it looks like you're trying to edit within policy but you probably weren't aware of the username policies when it comes this sort of thing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lachrymist (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm going to post a more in-depth explanation on the talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Lachrymist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Lachrymist

Hello, TheLachrymistFilm. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Lachrymist".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 09:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Lachrymist concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Lachrymist, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Username & Promotion

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 11:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Lachrymist

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Lachrymist, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 11:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:TheLachrymistFilm/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:TheLachrymistFilm/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 11:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TheLachrymistFilm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23637 was submitted on Dec 22, 2018 11:34:33. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 11:34, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock requests

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheLachrymistFilm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No reasons were given as to why my account was blocked. I've only used it to create one article and I don't do any editing of other articles. My account poses no threats to Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

The explanation is given clearly, above. Please read WP:GAB to understand how to craft an unblock request. Note that you will not be unblocked to continue writinga bout the Lachrymist film. Yamla (talk) 12:26, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheLachrymistFilm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not use this page for self-promotion. I only created an article I am personally connected to because it's an article that is mentioned on 4 other wikipedia articles and hasn't been created by anyone else yet. I used 5 different sources for the article. I own the rights to the image I tried to upload to Wikimedia. I have followed the rules exactly as written. I deserve to have my account unblocked and the one article I created restored.TheLachrymistFilm (talk) 13:14, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to request a new username, as explained in the block message. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheLachrymistFilm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm still new to all this and struggling, but I'm at least trying follow the rules as best I can. I didn't see where it says I should change my user name. I'm happy to do it, but can't figure out how. Will this solve the issue and my account will be restored? TheLachrymistFilm (talk) 1:17 pm, Today (UTC−8)

Decline reason:

Please look at the tag with the header "Username & Promotion". Basically, a username can not reflect a business, company or organization, only individuals can be editors, not groups. Your username reflects a commercial enterprise that you consistently write about. These are both problems, first with a commercial username and secondly, the fact that you write about yourself and your films. You, and all companies in your place, have a conflict of interest when you are writing about yourself. Another reason for your block is that it is doubtful you will choose to edit articles that are not related to your company. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:23, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

so if I agree to change the user name, agree not create an article about something I'm affiliated with and also agree to contribute to other articles, can I be unblocked? TheLachrymistFilm (talk) 01:38, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited your above comment to remove the unblock request formatting, as it is not an unblock request. Simple statements that are not unblock requests should not be formatted as unblock requests. To answer you, probably, especially if you state what it is you will edit about if you agree to not edit in the area of your conflict of interest. Please review WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 08:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheLachrymistFilm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it was an unblock request. I'm asking what do I have to do to be unblocked. If I agree to change the user name, agree not create an article about something I'm affiliated with and also agree to contribute to other articles, can I be unblocked? I would like to be unblocked, so I'm willing to do these things. This is not an auto block. This block does not have an expiration date. I have read the guide to appealing blocks and I have already followed the instructions. I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead. If this is still not good enough to be unblocked, then someone needs to explain why and what I can do differently.

Decline reason:

You seem to be having difficulty understanding the instructions given to you, both in the original block notice and in the messages you have received in answer to your unblock requests. Please go back to the block notice and re-read the section beginning "If you intend to make useful contributions..." Then make an unblock request which follows the instructions there, including offering a new user name that you are willing to change to, in the way that you are told to do it there. Also, the problem with unblock requests which merely say general things such as "I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again" is that experience over the years shows that very often the editor in question does not, in fact, understand the reasons for the block, and will do it again. Therefore, please show that you understand what the reason for the block is, by explaining in your own words what it is that you won't do again, rather than just saying that you understand it. Finally, most administrators are unwilling to unblock in this kind of situation unless the blocked editor gives a clear indication of some specific type of editing he or she expects to do, rather than just saying that they will "make productive contributions". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You will need to suggest a new username that complies with the username policy per the instructions in your block notice; you will need to agree to not edit in the area of your conflict of interest, and state what articles or topic areas you are interested in editing since you won't be editing about subjects related to your COI. 331dot (talk) 09:57, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]