User talk:TheWesternWorld

Welcome![edit]

Hello, TheWesternWorld, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gfosankar (talk) 05:09, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Craig Brittain (Web designer)[edit]

The article Craig Brittain (Web designer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This person could be covered more efficiently in the Is Anybody Down? article versus having a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSK ● talk ● contribs 06:16, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chance Trahan[edit]

The article Chance Trahan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This person could be covered more efficiently in the Is Anybody Down? article versus having a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSK ● talk ● contribs 06:17, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Alan Levy[edit]

The article Paul Alan Levy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This person could be covered more efficiently in the Public Citizen article versus having a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSK ● talk ● contribs 06:17, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Mjs1991. I noticed that you removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Paul Alan Levy, and I wanted to let you know that I have replaced it. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Mjs1991 (talk) 06:38, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did not remove a Bio Prod from Paul Alan Levy. Thank you. -TheWesternWorld (talk) 06:40, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Alan Levy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Alan Levy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Alan Levy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:41, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Paul Alan Levy. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Mjs1991 (talk) 06:42, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chance Trahan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chance Trahan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chance Trahan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:42, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Craig Brittain (Web designer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Craig Brittain (Web designer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Brittain (Web designer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:44, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do NOT remove warnings from your talk page. You will be reported to administrators Mjs1991 (talk) 06:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User is engaged in vandalism and edit war against me. I've reported him for his vandalism. -TheWesternWorld (talk) 07:00, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because you were disrupting Wikipedia--Mjs1991 (talk) 07:05, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, because I was reverting vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that the actual vandal has blanked his talk page already and he beat me to reporting him by less than 30 seconds. He is the one who should be banned for vandalism. -TheWesternWorld (talk) 07:08, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:04, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You should be blocking this user. Seb_az86556 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – continued vandalism of a single page, frivolous edits, violating the three revert rule, baseless accusations of harassment, blanking his talk page when asked to stop vandalizing the article in question -TheWesternWorld (talk) 07:09, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe think about not removing deletion templates from articles and removing repeated warnings given to you by users. Yes, it's YOUR talk page, but warnings and notices are to remain--User:Mjs1991 (talk) 07:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The user you are defending did all the things you accuse me of doing. I posted the warnings on his page and he removed them. Why don't you block him as well? -TheWesternWorld (talk) 07:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe User:Seb az86556 knows what he is doing right. He has been on Wikipedia since 2007, whereas you've been around since today - only a newbie. --Mjs1991 (talk) 07:21, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, he's your real life friend. Makes sense now - you're defending him because he's your RL friend. -TheWesternWorld (talk) 07:43, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That would possibly be a conflict of interest, Mjs1991. --GSK ● talk ● contribs 16:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mjs1991 didn't write that --Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:29, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Despite WP:RTP, I've removed the invalid comment edited in by TheWesternWorld. --GSK ● talk ● contribs 20:51, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Craig Brittain(Web Designer)"[edit]

A page you created, Craig Brittain(Web Designer), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Subject is notable and his notability is evidenced by multiple notable sources including NPR and Huffington Post. -TheWesternWorld (talk) 07:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheWesternWorld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm being vandalized and I've been blocked in error due the actions of several frivolous edit trolls who are really just out to block people they disagree with. Please note that my talk page has been extensively vandalized. Pointing out their acts of vandalism is NOT a personal attack. I should be immediately unblocked and they should be blocked from vandalizing my talk page.

Decline reason:

Due to your personal attacks, your block has ben extended to 1 week. To prevent further attacks and to give you some time to reflect on your behaviour, your right to edit this page has been revoked for 1 day, after that you can file another unblock request. Be warned though that continued personal attacks will quickly escalate your block to an indefinite one. Max Semenik (talk) 08:18, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm currently being flamed by a vandal gang. Good work, vandals, you have won. User:Seb az86556 is the primary culprit who insists on vandalizing this talk page. User:Mjs1991 is now engaged in the vandalism as well.

Congratulations![edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely for pretty major abuses of Wikipedia's e-mail system. I'm certain that the personal attacks and death wishes were sent with the best intentions, unfortunately, there's no possible way that such behaviour can exist in the community that is Wikipedia. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:01, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note that while evaluating an unblock request via UTRS it became clear that TheWesternWorld is Likely User:CollectorOfSouls. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 19:34, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]