User talk:The Master of Mayhem/Archive 5
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
What Gives?
Hey, my edit to Angel Hernandez was 100% truthful. Why the deletion? 98.217.235.103 (talk) 13:24, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors
Hi Master of Mayhem,
Welcome to the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog elimination drives! I believe it's your first time there? I've just had a bit of a look at the articles you've listed as having copy-edited for May, and think they may need a bit more work.
Please make sure you've carefully read Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives, and that you're familiar with Wikipedia:Basic copyediting and the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/How to contains some useful advice. I'll drop the 'Reviewer chair' User:Diannaa a note, and she may be able to provide some more specific advice. Cheers, --jjron (talk) 13:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Master of Mayhem. I am going to look at each of the articles that you have posted on the Drive page so far and give you some feedback. Sorry, I know this is a lot of information all at once, but getting this feedback is a great way to quickly improve your skills and learn about the particular needs and style guidelines of this wiki.
- Professor Zoom
- You only did copy edits to one section so you should therefore only take credit for that section. That means the word count should only be 79 words. But the section still does not make any sense: I am unable to understand it. If you are not able to understand it either, perhaps you should have left this article for someone else to do.
- Tupolev Tu-144
- You really did very little work to this article. When I started reading it I could see why: The article was tagged for copy edit and did not actually need any work. When this occurs, please do not take credit for the article. Just remove the copy edit tag and select another article.
- Transport in Greater Tokyo
- This one is fine.
- 10th Aviation Regiment (United States)
- I think you should have converted the Lineage section to prose, or added asterisks to turn it into a bulleted list. I have gone ahead and converted to prose Diff Diff. The word "or" should have been left capitalised because in this instance it means "gold". This section is the stylised language used in heraldry to describe shields and crests. So "Or" should be capitalised the same as "Sable" (black) and "Azure" (blue).
Since the unit is American, I converted to American-style dates.For articles on the modern US military, dd-mm-yy is the format that is used. WP:STRONGNAT. --Diannaa (Talk) 18:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Ayako Tsuru
- has some grammar and punctuation problems. In the lead, the last sentence is incomplete and should either be made grammatical or combined with the previous sentence by changing the punctuation. In the second section we have the opposite problem: two sentences are joined together with a comma. These need to be split into two grammatically correct complete sentences. Mexico City should have each word capitalised, in each occurrence throughout the article. This sentence needs the word "and" in place of the comma: "She exhibited Japanese inks, mural painting in 1989." In the list section, an equals sign is used as punctuation. It is not a punctuation sign. This should be converted to the use of commas and periods. Example:
- National School of Arts (UNAM): oil painting and enamels, Mexico City, Mexico. 1967
- Do them all the same way. The newspaper names in the "references" section should be in italics.
- Ben 10 (toy line)
- This one was well done.
I will look at the History of Sri Lanka tomorrow. It looks OK and I think it only needs some punctuation fixes. If you could please adjust your totals on the drive page for the first two articles that would be great. Thanks. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:10, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- I have updated your totals on the drive page to reflect the above information. These articles have been removed from the totals, as they were not adequately copy edited:
- Ayako Tsuru (249)
- History of Sri Lanka (6466)
- This one required no copy edits, and should not have been included in your totals:
- Tupolev TU-144 (8043)
- The word count for Professor Zoom was reduced, as only one section was copy edited. I have made corrections to your drive totals and the leader board. Sorry about that. I hope you are not too downhearted to continue editing with our group! Please let one of us know if you need any help. Regards, --Diannaa (Talk) 21:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Thx!
Hi m8
Thanks very much for the bstar :¬)
Long time no speak, glad you joined GOCE though. If you need any help feel free to ask.
Did you attempt the various practice pages ? Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/How_to They do take a little time but may help if you haven't already done them. If you want to steal anything from my user pages feel free lol. I find the GOCE sections particularly useful here and here as well as this:
Nice to see you got your tabs up and running! Anyway, good luck for the May drive and, as I said before, any help just ask :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 18:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Storm 2
I dunno what happened there, I thought I had left you a note after I Roboassessed it yesterday! Sorry m8, something must have gone wrong with the save - maybe I closed the tab too quickly. I thought it was strange it was already gone when I came to say thx, I guessed that you had the autoarchive set at 24 hours, guess I was wrong lol. Anyway I basically said:
Nice work! Especially the completed tables, I have assessed it as a start class.
Everything ok with you? I haven't bumped in to any edits you have made recently, but have been off for a fortnight with conjunctivitis :¬( and only just caught up with all the goings on in time for the start of the GOCE copyedit drive...
Keep up the good work! Chaosdruid (talk) 19:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
A gift chicken for you!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/86/Friedchicken.jpg/100px-Friedchicken.jpg)
Chaosdruid has given you a fresh piece of fried chicken! Pieces of fried chicken promote WikiLove and hopefully this piece has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a piping hot piece, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!
Spread the tastiness of fried chicken by adding {{subst:GiveChicken}} to their talk page with a friendly message, or gobble up this chicken the giver's talk page with {{subst:MunchChicken}}!!
Sheesh, I thought it was going to be a real live pre-being-cooked chicken, I was going to say "This one you can eat if you can catch it!" Chaosdruid (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Plus they really need to sort out the headers on these little wikilove banners lol - "A Give chicken for you"? what the hell did that mean? Chaosdruid (talk) 11:54, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Copyedits
I don't want to sound like a bad school teacher, or a nagging parent, but probably will lol - you shouldn't really count articles in the "completed" section if you haven't finished them, such as the Tupolev one...
You also seem to have missed quite a bit in the History of Sri Lanka one and you might want to go over it again. Alternatively I could copyedit it as well, and then you could see the changes I make - either choice is fine by me :¬)
I just want to make sure that you don't get into any deep water with out a flotation aid, or a creek without a paddle, as someone will be along to check your work sooner or later, well sooner as I was going to check one of them tonight lol, anyway have another look and let me know which you decide.
Chaosdruid (talk) 03:07, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
I have copydited the lead and you can have a look to see what I did here [1]. Obviously I would not expect you to make all those sort of changes yet as you are a fledgling copyeditor, I am just showing you so that you can look at it for reference :¬) I will have a look into the article itself now and provide a critique of it for you.
- Balagoda Man is a group, adding "The" made it appear as an individual (similar to The Neanderthal Man)
- Commas and () do the same job, so only one is required - ", (about 4 centimetres in length)," same as where a complete sentence was in brackets.
- "leaders were born of a mythical union between a lion and a human princess" - I changed it by adding "supposedly".
- Words which are then translated in brackets are generally italicised and quoted on their first use - The Oeufs des Anglais ("English eggs") are often used...
- "The blah blah, and blah blah." - Both the comma as well as the "and" are used to join phrases. Only one is needed, try to remove one to leave the more appropriate one. Short sentences often do not need splitting so that the comma can be removed, or replaced with another joining word. A comma is normally used to split associated phrases that are not talking about the same thing (as in my previous sentence where the first part talks about comma removal and the second part about replacing with another word - both are talking about the same thing though, splitting associated phrases).
Generally the copyediting you did was fine, mainly some punctuation necessary - for which I recommend a read of Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Punctuation and the exercises on learning to copyedit pages on the GOCEhow to and some which are on my GOCE page User:Chaosdruid/usefullinks/GOCE under the section "Tony's editing guides").
It took a considerable time for me to copyedit the article, as you can see (4 hours), and rather than me list the main areas you missed it is probably better if you look at my edits from the diffs, which might also help you understand more.
Try and just do one section at a time. Doing one big copyedit has a couple of disadvantages: other editors cannot easily use diffs to see what was changed and if anyone did try and edit while you were doing the copyedit you would have got an edit-conflict which would have been difficult to fix. You can also then stop for a break! continuing when you have recovered, or the next day if it goes into the early hours.
I hope this hasn't put you off copyediting! THe article was a pretty difficult one and I do admire you for trying it. There is a lot to learn from MoS' to grammatical problems (see this one User:Giraffedata/comprised_of out of interest) and if you are not sure of things, or want someone else to go over your work, you can always ask. I am more than happy to help, as would many others, the learning curve is fairly steep at first - you should see some of the mistakes I made in the first few months lol! Chaosdruid (talk) 17:00, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:43, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Waves hello
Just to confirm I am Me on Wikipedia and to be civil and say hello! User:MikeBeckett Please do say 'Hi!' 16:23, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
GOCE drive update
Guild of Copy Editors May 2011 backlog elimination drive update
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors May 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Here is your mid-drive newsletter.
![]() So far, 54 people have signed up for the drive, and 33 are actively participating. If you signed up for the drive but have not participated yet, it's not too late! Try to copy edit at least a few articles. Remember, if you have rollover words from the last drive, you will lose them if you do not participate in this drive. If you have not signed up for the drive yet, you can sign up now. If you have questions about getting started, feel free to talk to us. Many thanks to those editors who have been helping out at the Requests page. We currently have 17 articles awaiting edit.
We are making slow progress on achieving our target of reducing the overall backlog by 15%; in order to accomplish this goal we will need to complete about 400 more articles. However, we are making good progress on the 2009 backlog, as we have eliminated over half of the articles from 2009 that were present at the start of the drive. Let's concentrate our fire power on the remaining months from 2009; leaderboard awards will be handed out for 2009 articles this drive. Thank you for participating in the May 2011 drive. We hope it will be another success! Your drive coordinators – S Masters (talk), Diannaa (Talk), Tea with toast, Chaosdruid, and Torchiest |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 May 2011
- WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute
- Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
Osamabinladen20019
I've already reported him at AIV. Based on his just his first edit, he smells like a combination of troll and sock. HalfShadow 19:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:31, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Your change to my talk
I admire your attention to detail ;-) - David Gerard (talk) 20:59, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
June 2011 Wikification Drive
![]() | Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's June Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by about 900 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts June 1, but you can still sign up! |
Sumsum2010·T·C 23:54, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:51, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 May 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom referendum goes live; US National Archives residency; financial planning; brief news
- In the news: Collaboration with academia; world heritage; xkcd; eG8 summit; ISP subpoena; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Royal Railway
- Featured content: Whipping fantasies, American–British naval rivalry, and a medieval mix of purity and eroticism
- Arbitration report: Update – injunction from last week has expired
- Technology report: Wikimedia down for an hour; What is: Wikipedia Offline?