User talk:The Stoat Wobbler

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to John Craven. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. snigbrook (talk) 17:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page John Craven. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Craven, you will be blocked from editing. snigbrook (talk) 19:47, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to John Craven. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. BEVE (talk) 19:52, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

The vandalism carried out by you on John Craven's article is part of a persistent theme, stretching back over many months. I would find it very hard to accept that you were acting innocently, particularly having been warned about your actions. Bencherlite ^Talk 21:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]