User talk:Thehotelambush

Welcome!

Hello, Thehotelambush, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

TheRingess (talk) 21:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007[edit]

Omphalos (theology)[edit]

I noticed the improvement you made to the Omphalos (theology) article. That section reads much better now. Thank you! -- Bigwyrm 00:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to be of service. Thehotelambush 00:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisocion[edit]

Wikisocion, as one of the massive sprawl of informational wikis, is open source by definition and thus material can be used from it. (In fact, see Intuitive Logical Introvert and Template:Wikisocion; it was my intention to do more of them but its kind of pointless until the wikisocion descriptions are complete).

there are still a few issues with using material from wikisocion. we don't have a strict policy of sourcing material at wikisocion, nor should we; it would be impossible. that doesn't mean that totally unsourced material belongs at wikipedia, which has innumerable guidelines of what is and is not appropriate. given the size of wikipedia it is my experience that these rules are often practiced on a case by case basis. for anything relating to basic elements of socionics, i would suggest that these rules do not apply in this instance, out of concern for the practical reasons that rules cannot be made to conform to everything and that not every datum in an article can be cited.

I am not up on the advanced legalese that is practiced here, so the transfer of basic information might be more complicated, but we can deal with that if somebody complains.

btw, i need to steal that semicolon userbox. good find. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply[edit]

No I haven't but I'll definitely check it out. Thanks! :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Katieishme (talk • contribs) 16:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

International Academy Assesment[edit]

(B\High) Great additions with references, but they should all be put in the proper format. I have done a far bit of that as examples. Is the student handbook available online? If so, please reference it correctly, if not, please expand the reference. The news section needs expansion: one sentence is too little. Keep up the good work. — Calebrw (talk) 02:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Thehotelambush. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Thehotelambush. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]