User talk:ThreeSisters

ThreeSisters, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ThreeSisters! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Any other accounts?

Hello, I'm Zhangj1079. I noticed that you seemed to be editing with source editor, and in a knowledgeable way of how source editor works. Normally this would mean you have edited under other account(s). Please declare them immediately. Thank you. Zhangj1079 (T|C) 13:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, ThreeSisters, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Zhangj1079 (T|C) 13:02, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Speedy deletion nomination of Vince Thompson (author)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vince Thompson (author) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Blueclaw (talk) 16:57, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yobtar1, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 15:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Yobtar1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ThreeSisters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19002 was submitted on Aug 15, 2017 19:27:45. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThreeSisters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've learned that the authentic use of Wikipedia requires one narrative and this has been my priority number one. I opened account Mastertake at first but didn't provide an email address and was locked out. The only account I've used since then was ThreeSisters, the page I opened on June 18th, 2017. I maintained editing continuity, which improved Wikipedia context and increased information and trust. I believe it helps to build long-term communal support and references to Wikipedia audiences. Also, I believe the block would be affecting individual communities, Ukrainian speaking audiences and creative minds that need to have translations and access to a worldwide encyclopedia where people share their knowledge with millions of individuals. There is a Columbia University Ukrainian club that requested to translate certain pages, and I will only be able to edit after my block is removed. The reasons for maintaining one account is reasonable and fair and my biggest priority to follow the rules and policy of the trusted source of Wikipedia administration and authorities. Thank you.

Decline reason:

This doesn't mention the account, Yobtar1 (talk · contribs), at all. Yamla (talk) 11:16, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThreeSisters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have used one account as I am simply a volunteer and edit some articles upon request from the Columbia University Alumni Club or other communities like Y Combinator or non-profit organization Fractured Atlas. Is Yobtar1 a Wikipedia administrator? Can you provide information on us being one person? I'd like to investigate this with your supervisor to make sure my account is unblocked in good faith. I have an MFA in Creative Producing and I have writing skills and help society and charitable organizations. I have never met Yobtar1 and I have never used Yobtar1 account's editing system. If you'd like my personal information, I'll be glad to provide to you for evidence, authority and visibility to the public

Decline reason:

The technical connection to Yobtar1's sockfarm is only moderately evident, but looking though the list of pages you created - and the content you created them with - it's very clear that you were either recreating articles with a new account or acting in consort with Yobtar1 and friends. To claim otherwise, as you do so above, is disingenuous: even without the technical similarities it is obvious that you and Yobtar1 are either the same person or are working together. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:37, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.