User talk:Timmeh/Archive 6

This is an archive of past discussions with Timmeh. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

< Archive 5

Archive 6

All Pages:

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - ... (up to 100)

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

rise against savior

i got the #29 peak from a guy of a message board called ATRL.76.110.128.158 (talk) 23:53, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your coming to my talk page and explaining instead of edit warring. However, "a guy" from a message board is not a reliable source, and Wikipedia's core content policy is verifiability. Tim meh 00:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ATRL.net is the source. idk if I can post the message board site as the source.76.110.128.158 (talk) 00:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Message boards are not reliable sources. See here for more info on what constitutes a reliable source. Tim meh 00:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Gontier

Someone seriously screwed his article up. I gave up trying to fix it right now. Might want to check it out. Daniel Musto (talk) 03:25, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Fall Out Boy

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Fall Out Boy/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Best of Slipknot

The Article Greatest Hits, Vol. 1 (Korn album), is very similar to the page I have created. However, the Korn article cites NO recourses. The Slipknot article cites some. Why Exactly is the Slipknot article being deleted? CrowzRSA 18:11, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That Korn article may not be notable either. I haven't looked into it. However, there are no reliable sources proving the Slipknot album has notability or even exists. You can take a look at the deletion discussion for my deletion rationale. Tim meh 18:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per CrowzRSA's request to delete, and your subsequent tagging of the article under WP:CSD#G7, I have deleted the article and closed the AFD. Sincerely, Willking1979 (talk) 18:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Will :) Tim meh 20:17, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Brobecks

Hey Tim, My name is Scott, I am a huge Brobecks fan as well as a Panic! at the Disco fan (Dallon Weekes of the Brobecks tours with them) i actually began my own page for the brobecks, but it suffers from a lot of vandalism. i try to keep up, but i was wondering if you could find it in your heart to help me maintain that page. you do such a kil;ler job with Panics page. Anyway, i understand if not, but i could really use the help.

Thanks For Reading, Scott —Preceding unsigned comment added by Factoidmactoid (talk • contribs) 04:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scott. I'm not sure I'll have time to help you in any substantial manner with The Brobecks anytime soon, but I'll put it on my watchlist and revert any vandalism that I see. When you're adding information to Wikipedia, just remember that all information in an article must be verifiable and must cite reliable sources. You could also take a look here for more info on how to develop a good article if you want to continue improving the one you created. If you have any specific questions, don't hesitate to ask me. Tim meh 05:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Very helpful! thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Factoidmactoid (talk • contribs) 20:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sum 41

Tim, I'd quote a source, but The Bugle is an audio-only podcast with no transcripts. What do you suggest? (And if I may be so bold, you were a wee bit snippy in pointing me to the Wikipedia guidelines.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougom (talk • contribs) 04:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive me for linking to those policies. I saw your edit count and assumed you were a new editor who did not know much about our policies. I think you might still be able to cite the podcast using {{Cite podcast}} if absolutely necessary, although third-party, independent sources are preferred. Tim meh 04:40, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Panic! at the Disco

Re: This – it wasn't my intention to shuffle the order around; the intent of my edit was to revert the POV-pushing IP's addition of "folk punk", which is totally unsourced anywhere in the article. I didn't realize you're rearranged the genres to reflect the number of sources. Sorry. --IllaZilla (talk) 04:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed folk punk and rearranged the genres. I probably should have been more specific in my edit summary. No harm done, though. :) Tim meh 04:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wp:rpp

I've requested page protection of your user page due to vandalism. A8 UDI 22:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So fulfilled. –xeno^talk 22:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks guys. Much appreciated. Tim meh 03:07, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yo ho ho

Ϣere SpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec09}} to your friends' talk pages.

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which failed with 21 support, 39 oppose, and 11 neutral.
This is highly belated, but I wanted to thank you for your comments in the RfA discussion. I do apologize for taking so long to reply to you, after the failure I laid back for a while for several reasons and WP took a backseat. I just dove into another article and am working more diligently on WP. I have taken your concerns about the master franchise and have been working to improve my reactions to comments by others. I can get testy and have been trying to be more respectful in my interactions with those I am in disagreemnt with.

Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 07:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Wikipedia Dramaout

Hi! As you have expressed an interest in the initial The Great Wikipedia Dramaout, you're being notified because we are currently planning another one in January! We hope to have an even greater level of participation this time around, and we need your help. If you're still interested please sign up now at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! JCbot (talk) 04:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Your editor review

My editor review page has been fixed. Would you like to be the first to review me? --ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV13 00:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll review you, but I won't have time to do so until next week. Tim meh 01:04, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Click there to open your card! → → →

Dear Timmeh,
Wishing you, your family, and friends a very merry Christmas (or whatever you celebrate at this time of year), and I hope that the new year will be a good one, in real life, and on the wiki. There is always a reason to spread the holiday spirit; it's a special time of year of almost everyone. ;)
Love and best wishes, Meaghan - ^Merry _Christmas! - 00:39, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Debate over whether or not Bobby Jindal and Mark Sanford should be removed the 2012 Rep Primary Page

There seems to be yet another debate over Mark Sanford and now whether not Bobby Jindal should remain on this page. Since you are an editor on this page, I was hoping you would be interested in joining the discussion at the link below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012#This_article_is_not_about_who_will_be_running.3F

Please provide your feedback! Thanks so much!

--Diamond Dave (talk) 20:07, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The usual well-wishing

Hello. Long time no reviews. Hope you're having a good, lazy week off. Although I'd love to get some input from you on Is This It over at FAC when you've got some time. Also, what's the plan with 21cB? Found any nice comprehensive sources? RB88 (T) 07:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rafablu. I hope you're having a great holiday season. I'll take a look at your article and hopefully will be able to give some input sometime this week. About 21st Century Breakdown, I admit I haven't done much with it in a while. I've been using my time off mainly to get caught up on other things. I'll see if I can find some sources this week, and I'll drop a note at the talk page to see if any of the other contributors know of any comprehensive sources we haven't used yet. Thanks for the reminder. Tim meh 22:57, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Green Day

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Green Day/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]