Jump to content

User talk:Tonrene

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Tonrene, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Tbennert (talk) 17:55, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Time pressure (May 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
FireflySixtySeven (talk) 18:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Time pressure regions (June 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
hewhoamareismyself 06:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:The theory of fuel and trigger (June 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
hewhoamareismyself 06:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Time pressure (June 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Fiddle Faddle 18:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:The theory of fuel and trigger (August 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

Cerebellum (talk) 17:59, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The theory of fuel and trigger (October 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. --Mdann52talk to me! 07:27, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fuel and Trigger Model (January 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

(t) Josve05a (c) 09:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The Fuel and Trigger model suggests that there is an existing attribute of a human being (which is the fuel) and there is an external agent (that is the trigger) which when combined is responsible for the actions to create an event and if the fuel can be separated from the trigger, then the event can be mitigated. The model was first demonstrated by Amartya Deb at the National Conference on Mind and Management (2013) held at University School of Management Studies, New Delhi to argue that human actions are merely expressions of human emotions. A systematic breakdown of the chain of events that occurred prior to the Chicago race riot of 1919 was used to establish the utility of the idea.

Background[edit]

Several studies and ideas have been carried out across the world to study human emotions, focused on bringing out a hierarchical dimension of the emotions and subsequently to segregate and categorize the existing emotions into types like positive and negative. With that as base, the concept of ‘Fuel and Trigger’ provides a framework to predict the reactions that might stem from them. The principle thought behind the idea is that any reaction or an event is linked to the human emotions or attributes which are root causes behind occurrence of events.

The concept of “Fuel and Trigger” was essentially intended to be used as an analytical tool to understand the past events with respect to the human feeling that had caused them. The scope of the concept lies in the right interpretation of the fuel and trigger in a given event or a series of events. It has been argued to hold potential to help determine the course of action that must be taken to increase the tolerance of the society to the occurrence of negative events (like riots, murders, wars etc.) and reduce the magnitude of adverse effects caused by them.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Fuel and Trigger Model[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Fuel and Trigger Model requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.academia.edu/6615678/Fuel_and_Trigger_Mitigating_Negative_Measurable_Impacts_of_Social_Behavior. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted both this draft and the previous version as copyright violations of this article. Please do not copy-paste or closely paraphrase copyrighted, non-free content on Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 22:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Time pressure concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Time pressure, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Time pressure regions concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Time pressure regions, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Time pressure concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Time pressure, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Time pressure regions concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Time pressure regions, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Time pressure[edit]

Hello, Tonrene. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Time pressure".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. samtar {t} 11:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Time pressure regions[edit]

Hello, Tonrene. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Time pressure regions".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. samtar {t} 11:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bear and Idiot Romance[edit]

Notice

The article Bear and Idiot Romance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book lacking in-depth, non-trivial support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bear and Idiot Romance for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bear and Idiot Romance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bear and Idiot Romance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 17:07, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bear and Idiot Romance for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bear and Idiot Romance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bear and Idiot Romance (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GMGtalk 17:07, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to figure out what the talk pages meant. At least I learnt that. Please feel free to delete the page Bear and Idiot Romance. I could not manage to do it. Thanks. (Tonrene (talk) 06:02, 9 August 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Tonrene, unless you or your book receive a major, notable literary prize, it will never meet Wikipedia criteria for inclusion. There is little sense in moving it to draft space, it will get deleted there too. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. Cool. I'll create the page in Wiki after an award. Thanks again for your time, all others too. (Tonrene (talk) 06:00, 9 August 2018 (UTC))[reply]
Hey Tonrene. In order for the subject to qualify for a Wikipedia article it needs to meet our standards for notability, which requries sustained in-depth coverage in reliable independent sources (see also Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources). For books, this normally means things like in-depth book reviews in major publications, and mainstream industry awards. This excludes things like self-published blogs and content created by the book's publisher. In order to qualify for a page on Wikiquote, a subject generally should already have an article on Wikipedia, or clearly qualify for one in the case one has not yet been written.
If the book receives this type of coverage in the future, the it may be appropriate to recreate the article, but until then, we will have to wait until such coverage exists. GMGtalk 12:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hey GMGtalk thanks for the links. I will keep the notability standards in mind and will look forward to that time. (Tonrene (talk) 12:34, 19 August 2018 (UTC))[reply]

File permission problem with File:AmartyaDebCatherineGardens.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:AmartyaDebCatherineGardens.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:10, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Fuel and Trigger - worksheet.jpg[edit]

Notice

The file File:Fuel and Trigger - worksheet.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Spatio-economic Development Record (1994 - 2018)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Spatio-economic Development Record (1994 - 2018), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 10:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spatio-economic Development Record (1994 - 2018) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Spatio-economic Development Record (1994 - 2018), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Spatio-economic Development Record (1994 - 2018) 2[edit]

Information icon Hello, Tonrene. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Spatio-economic Development Record (1994 - 2018) 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spatio-economic Development Record (1994 - 2018) 2 (January 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wgullyn was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
None of the sources have in-depth coverage on the journal.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Wgullyn (talk) 22:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Tonrene! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wgullyn (talk) 22:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tonrene&oldid=1147994993"