User talk:Torah28

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Torah28, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Saoirse Ronan has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid puffery[edit]

Torah28, please read WP:PEACOCK and avoid using flowery language, keeping to a neutral point of view towards article subjects. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 12:40, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Brooklyn (film) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! – JuneGloom07 Talk 01:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you keeping adding non-notable critics groups/organisations to the Brooklyn accolades table, including Boston Online Film Critics Association and the Abitibi-Témiscamingue International Film Festival. These were removed because their articles were either deleted at WP:AFD for being non-notable or do not satisfy the criteria at WP:ORGDEPTH to have one in the first place. Please don't add them back. - JuneGloom07 Talk 16:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The St. Louis film critics site does not list any runner-ups with their winners, so could you provide a reliable source before changing the results. Thank you. - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brooklyn (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brooklyn (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of accolades received by Brooklyn (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Saoirse Ronan. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Please use edit summaries. Why are you removing sourced material and including unsourced material? Please stop! Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 01:07, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

more Saoirse Ronan issues[edit]

Hello Torah28,

Your edits of 24 January 2016 seen here had several formatting issues. Please be careful when adding citations as you

broke the template for citation #8
made a wikilink to the term Vice rather than to Vice (magazine), check your wikilinks to ensure that they are going to the correct article
named a citation after your user name rather than giving a name that would be useful to other editors such as the name of the cited author or the title of the cited source
cited a blog. Per WP:SELFPUBLISH "Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book, and also claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published media...are largely not acceptable as sources". In addition, you put something which you said occurred in 2010 in the section titled "2003–09" rather than in the "2010–present" section.

I appreciate your enthusiasm for working on this article and I hope that I don't sound unduly harsh.

Best regards,

Mtminchi08 (talk) 23:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also - please use edit summaries! It'd be a help to other editors. And to you, when you have go amend an edit you already made. (There's a 'Preview' button, too!) Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of accolades received by Brooklyn (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sources and edit summaries are wonderful things... – JuneGloom07 Talk 03:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Crowley (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Goldfinch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

I noticed your recent multiple edits to Saoirse Ronan does not have any edit summaries. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Failure to do so increases the likelihood your additions will be mass-reverted even if some of them are good additions. Thanks! Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing it again. Seriously - would it be so hard to put in edit summaries like "Added reference", "Added info about next project", "Copyedit, spelling?" Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 13:42, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Saoirse Ronan does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Hi, you really do need to start using edit summaries, especially for non obvious edits. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 20:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saoirse Ronan[edit]

Is there any reason you insist on changing "Irish and American" to "Irish-American"? Users have had a discussion about this; as I've said, please see Talk:Saoirse_Ronan#Lead: Irish... American... and discuss your opinions there. Thanks. Wolfdog (talk) 15:23, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Torah, I went on Saorise's talk page and voiced my view that it should be irish-american. for whatever reason, it's bad to think of her as irish-american, despite that being exactly what she is. I got yelled at in capital letters over it. If you support it, please say so on her talk page. Take care. Lisabedwell89 (talk) 15:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that Torah28 is unwilling to discuss. Instead, Torah, you've insisted on reverting FOUR TIMES regardless of what has already been discussed and without a single attempt to communicate with me, while I've consistently requested you to discuss. Your reverts are going against a consensus reached by a discussion you choose to ignore. I've reported your behavior to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Wolfdog (talk) 22:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Torah28_reported_by_User:Wolfdog_.28Result:_.29 or participate in the discussion on the article's talk page? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've been editing but haven't responded. I'm going to close the edit warring report with a warning to you indicating further undiscussed changes to the lead will probably result in a block. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Musdan77. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Saoirse Ronan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Musdan77 (talk) 17:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the content is false. Saoirse Ronan does not star in the The Breadwinner. That's why it was removed. Thanks. Torah28 (talk) 12:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You know what'd help, Torah? Edit summaries. Like you've been asked to do many times before. The consensus is to use "Irish and American". The MOS doesn't require the inclusion of city/state/country. Please engage on talk pages rather than edit warring. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Irish and American is incorrect. Ronan is Irish-American. Torah28 (talk) 13:51, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, she isn't. And consensus also diagrees with you. Again - check the talk page. Last section. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually no. Perhaps you should research! Like myself, Ronan has dual citizenship:'Irish-American'. Torah28 (talk) 14:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, yes - read and engage on the article's talk page. Irish-American refers to ethnicity, not nationality. Nobody is disputing the fact of her dual citizenship. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:16, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm fully aware that it stands for ethnicity, but it's incorrect to refer to Ronan as Irish and American. Anyone who has dual citizenship should be referred to as e.g. 'American-British' or 'Irish-American', etc. It's about being correct! Torah28 (talk) 20:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Saoirse Ronan. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You were previously warned by NeilN regarding this. -- Dane2007 ^talk 21:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Torah28 reported by User:Dane2007 (Result: ). Thank you. -- Dane2007 ^talk 21:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Torah28. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:13, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Saoirse Ronan, you may be blocked from editing. As mentioned to you lots of times, you are editing out of consensus and out of policy. For the city/state, the US and NY is already linked and mentioned so no need to do it again. Also please follow consensus with Irish/American. You need to participate on the talk page and not just blindly edit. 🔯 Sir Joseph ^🍸(talk) 19:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Torah28. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Torah28 reported by User:TropicAces (Result: ). Thank you. TropicAces (talk) 16:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. User keeps trolling page by adding information that's already featured on page, deleting information that is relevant like international distribution, producer and release date, and other relevant information. Torah28 (talk) 16:51, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Collins will send the Yakuza to kill yew![edit]

This user keeps deleting relevant links to Phil Collins on other pages, such as his soundtrack work. He is also probably responsible for the chronic vandalism of Phil's page. Please cease and desist before the Fist of Ibaraki lays the smacketh down on yew! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.190.14 (talk) 05:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Torah28. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Saoirse Ronan does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Sir Joseph ^(talk) 16:08, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have used edit summary. Torah28 21;53 December 5, 2017 (UTC)

December 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. –Davey2010^Talk 21:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revert one more time and I'll take you to WP:AN3, Go to the talkpage and seek consensus for your changes. –Davey2010^Talk 22:05, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Torah28 reported by User:Davey2010 (Result: ). Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 22:12, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Kuru (talk) 22:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There parts of the SNL article that are false 1. Only the Aer Lingus sketch caused some criticism, not other aspects of the show 2. Aer Lingus used that Donald Trump tweet as a joke and were referring to Aer Lingus sketch-only, not the whole show. Torah28 22:59 December 5, 2017 (UTC)

Personal life section- Ronan purchased a home in 2013, article states She has lived in New York since January 2016[12] but also bought a house in Howth in Ireland.[66] This is incorrect-Ronan no longer lives in Howth. Torah28 23:06 December 5, 2017 (UTC)

Right let me explain .... this website is a collaborative project which means we need to discuss things (like changes), you and editors in general cannot just hit undo and start reverting .... if you're reverted then you need to discuss it,

If you're unwilling to discuss or don't want to then you get blocked and if you carry on WP:EDIT WARRING without discussing it then you will be reblocked but for a lot longer and it will keep getting longer the more you edit war,

Once your block expires you need to go to Talk:Saoirse Ronan and you need to discuss your changes over there,

Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 23:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saoirse Ronan article[edit]

Hello. I don't know who you are, individual or collective - or OTT fan, or PR agency. But you called a simple corrective edit "vandalism" and that's not on. I'm just a fan of the lady, from near Howth, as it happens, was reading the article in my hotel yesterday, and literally saw it change between refreshes. Removing content known to half the US and Ireland, at least, and current. So I reverted this hack. Now same again today. I don't know what your problem is, but if you thing this is "her" wiki page, as in belongs to Ms Ronan, you're just plain wrong. It is a neutral page with facts. Not a promotional thing, not an attack thing. Now, the SNL thing, was it Saoirse's greatest moment, no, but her getting to host that show is relevant, a career milestone, and so is the criticism. I see above this page that there is some long-standing issue, so I won't spend more time on this. But please learn what "vandalism" really is. 109.252.28.12 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:29, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Saoirse Ronan at 2017 Governors Awards (cropped).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Saoirse Ronan at 2017 Governors Awards (cropped).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Margot Robbie, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. – JuneGloom07 Talk 16:24, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Saoirse 2017 (AFP-Getty Images) (cropped).jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Saoirse 2017 (AFP-Getty Images) (cropped).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Saoirse Ronan attends 2017 Governors Awards (cropped).jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Saoirse Ronan attends 2017 Governors Awards (cropped).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Saoirse Ronan at 2017 Governors Awards (cropped).jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Saoirse Ronan at 2017 Governors Awards (cropped).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saoirse Ronan[edit]

Hi, Please discuss you edits on the talkpage, Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 17:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for this before, so please stop your disruptive edits on Ronan's page. --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're disrupting the whole article- There's no need for such long winded headings! Example: 2015-present is suffice. Ronan joining the Academy isn't personal and should be under the heading 2010-present. Also, I've had to correct your grammar throughout article. You can't change the article of your own accord .Torah28 (talk) 13:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously do not understand your warring mentality and ownership issues on Ronan's page. You refuse to participate in the talk page discussion, and go about unilaterally removing decent contributions in favour of poorly written fluff. If you have concerns, talk about it first on the talk page. Thank you. --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 15:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Torah28, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Little Women (2019 film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Little Women (2019 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Women (2019 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 20:12, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Saoirse Ronan. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:28, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring while logged out. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Torah28, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:46, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring while logged out at Saoirse Ronan[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 days for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This account began making similar edits at Saoirse Ronan to those recently made by 46.7.77.74 (talk · contribs) as soon as semiprotection was applied to the article per a request at WP:RFPP. EdJohnston (talk) 14:03, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Little women 2019 film[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Little women 2019 film, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 09:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An article about the same subject was deleted through this discussion. A draft exists at Draft:Little Women (2019 film). You are welcome to contribute to the draft, and publish it when the principle photography begins. Also, kindly see WP:NFILM. If there further questions/doubts, please feel free to ask. Regards, —usernamekiran(talk) 09:12, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Little women 2019 moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Little women 2019, has been moved draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) as principal photography has not begun (see WP:NFF). Also note that there is already a similar draft on the same film Draft:Little Women (2019 film) and I suggest you coordinate with the editors of that draft instead of having duplicates. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:32, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Torah28. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]