User talk:Trulio Drulio

Welcome![edit]

Hi Trulio Drulio! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 05:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit filter[edit]

Sorry about the trouble there. I've made an adjustment, and you shouldn't have any more problems. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 18:17, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awww... it's so generous of you Suffusion of Yellow. Here, have cookie 🍪. Trulio Drulio (talk) 18:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Music in Minnesota has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Music in Minnesota. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anemoia (March 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anemoia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anemoia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 00:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trulio Drulio! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 00:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey BuySomeApples, thanks for the review on Anemoia. I substantially agree with your suggestions and will abide by them, thanks for letting me know. I was wondering, can you also review the Music in Minnesota (magazine) draft. It's been pending since two days. I have high hopes that this article will be kept as the subject has independent and non-biased press coverage. Please let me know :)

Trulio Drulio (talk) 02:36, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trulio Drulio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello administrators! First of all, I'll admit the truth. Yes, Enormous Efrit, was my old account. But after getting blocked for the second time at Enormous Efreet, I realised that being against the policies is not a good thing to do. I created this account solely for the purpose of making constructive edits. I realised how Wikipedia works behind the scenes, and was fascinated by the process and the determination of its editors. I wanted to become a valuable Wiki editor myself. If you go through my account logs or contributions, you will see that I've tried to be constructive and have not spread vandalism, nor will ever again. I am requesting a thorough review of this account, as Wikipedia Block policies state: "that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead". Even in the future, you can keep track of my habits and block me if I do spread vandalism. I promise you, that I once used to spread Vandalism, but now I fight it myself. I am a WikiBogeyman afterall. Trulio Drulio (talk) 03:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You'll need to request unblock from your original account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 03:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Emir Shane (talk) 14:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note (and in case this account user is monitoring this talk page): A non AfC reviewer have moved the article to mainspace, and left the banner above. I have moved back the article to draftspace, and left a review on the draft. – robertsky (talk)

Music in Minnesota (magazine) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Music in Minnesota (magazine), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – robertsky (talk) 15:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Music in Minnesota (magazine) (March 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

need more secondary sources to back the notability of the subject. Voyageminnesota - interview; primary source. americantowns - company profile listing; should not be used to prove notability of article. metallica - 'in the press' jump page. kare11.com - local news coverage. fox9 - tangential.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Music in Minnesota (magazine) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Music in Minnesota (magazine), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 15:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anemoia[edit]

Hello, Trulio Drulio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anemoia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Music in Minnesota (magazine)[edit]

Hello, Trulio Drulio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Music in Minnesota (magazine), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Music in Minnesota (magazine)[edit]

Hello, Trulio Drulio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Music in Minnesota".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:13, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]