User talk:Ttifacts

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ttifacts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 12 October[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Elevations Residential Treatment Center page, your edit caused an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is Island View Incorporated in Delaware?[edit]

Friend, I have created a talk page entry on this topic at the Island View Residential Treatment Center article. I'd welcome your input and would hope we can avoid an edit/revert war. Best regards, GetSomeUtah (talk) 10:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HEAL as a source for Elevations[edit]

Friend, please see my response on HEAL on the Elevations page. GetSomeUtah (talk) 08:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Abundant Life Academy[edit]

Draft:Abundant Life Academy, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Abundant Life Academy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Abundant Life Academy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Island View Residential Treatment Center[edit]

Hello, thanks for your work to improve Island View Residential Treatment Center. We can't move the page yet, as it's in the middle of a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Island View Residential Treatment Center. If the Island View article is kept, then it will need to be merged somehow to the existing correct title, Elevations Residential Treatment Center. I'd be glad of some help to improve the Island View article, if you've got time - I think it's notable and should be kept. Thanks, TMG^talk 10:53, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Island View Residential Treatment Center, you may be blocked from editing. Hey! I saw you reverted my removal of part of your edit and the better source needed tag- I removed and tagged those parts because Ranker is not a reliable source, and HuffPost is not the best. Please check out WP:RS Shadowrvn728 (talk) 22:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I undid your removal of the sports section - not sure why it was removed

Shadowrvn728 (talk) 22:32, 30 September 2020 (UTC) ‘ I[reply]

Hello, I'm Shadowrvn728. I noticed that you recently removed content from Logan River Academy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. previously mentioned in talk Shadowrvn728 (talk) 22:34, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you have cites to the sports section? Make sure to use citations. Ttifacts (talk) 07:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elevations RTC (January 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Island View Residential Treatment Center instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It appears that one article should cover the center under both names. It is not important whether that article be entitled Elevations RTC or Island Residential View Treatment Center. If there is a reason why it is important to have two separate articles, please explain that need in AFC comments or article space. Otherwise, edit the existing article, and you may discuss moving/renaming the article if desired.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elevations RTC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elevations RTC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ttifacts! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Ttifacts! Your additions to Elevations RTC have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa, thank you for the input. Do you know how to fix the redirect from the page? It should be Elevations RTC, but the Island View search page should also redirect to Elevations. Is the redirect set up correct? Ttifacts (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's redirects at Island View Residential Treatment Center and Elevations Residential Treatment Center. Island View redirects to Island View High School.— Diannaa (talk) 01:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Troubled Teen Industry (January 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Articles need to be fleshed out more and not depend on just a single reference to an organization. Verbiage also needs to be rewritten.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Troubled Teen Industry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Troubled Teen Industry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI notice[edit]

Hello, Ttifacts. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Elevations RTC. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Please provide more info whenever accusing someone of vandalism. If you see me vandalizing, please leave a message on my talk page. Shadowrvn728 ❯❯❯ Talk 23:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Elevations RTC while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Shadowrvn728 ❯❯❯ Talk 23:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Elevations RTC § Physical vs manual restraint[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Elevations RTC § Physical vs manual restraint. Shadowrvn728 ❯❯❯ Talk 02:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ttifacts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is my only account. I am not sure what you are talking about.--Ttifacts (talk) 02:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ttifacts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, can you please unblock me. I inadvertently was logged out of my account and edited in that manner. As for the other account, that is not me. I did not understand that there was a 3 edit revert rule within 24 hours, or I would not have done that. Now that I know, I will not revert edits in that fashion. There was a disagreement on edits between Shadowrvn728 and me, and neither of us could come to an agreement though we tried to discuss them on the talk page as you can see. Each day Shadowrvn728 would come in and delete my edits, and it would go back and forth. It is not fair, however, to only block me indefinitely. I am not trying to use my IP address to get around that, rather I was just trying to stop Shadowrvn728 from deleting my edits as I did not agree that the article was not well-sourced. Rather, it has over 75 sources. Anyhow, the disagreement has been resolved as we agreed to phrase a certain one sentence in a certain manner, and information that was considered promotional (though not intentionally) has been removed and that is fine. Please unblock me so that I can continue editing on Wikipedia. Again, it would be unfair to block me permanently when the disruption has ceased. Thank you for your consideration. Ttifacts (talk) 02:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to explain why Three-weeks-earlier is restoring edits that you made. You should also read through Wikipedia:Edit warring and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. You don't seem to understand them. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment: I oppose the granting of this appeal. In the appeal, the user refers to me as "the Shadow person". This provides more evidence as to why this account is a sockmaster, as the sockpuppet also called me "the shadow person" on a response to a warning on their talk page here User talk:2601:645:8700:D350:640E:E57A:B198:E671 Shadowrvn728 ❯❯❯ Talk 03:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is my IP address, I did not realize I was not logged in. However, someone is saying that I am using another account, which is NOT true. I am calling you the shadow person because I do not know how to refer to your name in the coding. That is all. There is no sockpuppetry here. There is one person who was making edits and in a war with you, that person is me. The dispute has since been resolved. You could equally be accused of being in an edit war as you were also warring with the edits. Ttifacts (talk) 03:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ttifacts: I did not violate the WP:3RR, and I placed a message on your talk page regarding editing while logged out.

@Shadowrvn728: Ok, well I was not aware of the three revert rule. I just now read that about the 24 hour rule. I will not revert within 24 hours. You are reverting every 24 hours to get around this rule. Anyways if those are the only rules being violated, then my appear should be granted as the problem has been fixed and there is no need for further block.Ttifacts (talk) 03:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ttifacts: I put a message on both your talk page, and of the IP you were using, notifying you that you are editing while logged out. You continued to edit logged out after you responded to it right below my message, so you would have seen it. Even if the logout was inadvertent, you refused to discuss on the talk page about any edits after a certain point, but continued to revert anyway and you ignored the warnings placed on both talk pages about being logged out. Even if you didn't know about the rules, warnings were places and messages were posted, and you continued editing without responding to some of them

@GeneralNotability: Please see the discussion above. I do not have another account, and I am not sure how anyone came to that conclusion. I have had this account for a long time, and as I discussed above, was making edits when I inadvertently and unknowingly was logged out of this account. Shadowrvn728 has been making reverts every day and deleting material from the article to get around the 24 hour rule. I had attempted to resolve the issue and it took until today to reach a compromise. Accordingly, the issue has been resolved. I will not make more than 3 reverts within 24 hours going forward. Please remove the block.

Concern regarding Draft:Elevations RTC[edit]

Hello, Ttifacts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elevations RTC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Troubled Teen Industry[edit]

Hello, Ttifacts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Troubled Teen Industry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Troubled Teen Industry[edit]

Hello, Ttifacts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Troubled Teen Industry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:47, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]